Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AshKKKroft's Gun Rights Idioocy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:42 AM
Original message
AshKKKroft's Gun Rights Idioocy
"It turns out that the attorney general -- best friend to gun fanatics -- refuses to allow the FBI to use a law enforcement database to investigate whether alleged terrorists have purchased or tried to purchase firearms. In other words, Ashcroft would rather stay loyal to the gun lobby than find out whether terrorists have Tec-9's.
Ashcroft has a history of Second Amendment absolutism. A member of the National Rifle Association, he was the subject of a flattering profile in its magazine earlier this year. And, as head of the Justice Department, he has been the NRA's lackey.
In May, he wrote the NRA leadership a letter in which he abandoned long-standing Justice Department policy to declare that the "Second Amendment clearly protects the right of individuals to keep and bear firearms."
Previously, the Justice Department had supported reasonable restrictions on individual gun ownership.
In a stunning exception to his treatment of noncitizens since Sept. 11, he has decided that gun-purchase records may not be used to check whether foreigners have tried to buy firearms; they have a right to privacy that must be protected.
They have no other rights, mind you. "

http://www.callandpost.com/callandpost/law/default_article.asp?id=302
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another crock of shit brought to you by the VPC/Brady Center
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 02:03 PM by slackmaster
The law (Section 922 in Title 18 of the United States Code as amended by the Brady Act) requires the National Instant Check System to:

"...(A) assign a unique identification number to the transfer;

(B) provide the licensee with the number; and

(C) destroy all records of the system with respect to the call (other than the identifying number and the date the number was assigned) and all records of the system relating to the person or the transfer...."


There is no provision for retention of personal identifying information once the check is completed.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/htm_hl?DB=uscode18&STEMMER=en&WORDS=922+&COLOUR=Red&STYLE=s&URL=/uscode/18/922.html#muscat_highlighter_first_match

In other words, Ashcroft would rather stay loyal to the gun lobby than find out whether terrorists have Tec-9's.

That is an absurd statement. At no time does any data about the type of gun being sold ever enter the NICS database. NICS data is simply a list of individuals known to be prohibited from owning firearms.

If the FBI thinks a person is enough of a risk to be worth monitoring, they have plenty of legal means to do that available to them. This so-called issue is a distraction, a sideshow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pimp for AshKKKroft over at highroadrage.com, slack
Nice playmate you got there....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tell me something, Bench
How does it feel to be wrong all the time? I don't know how you do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not being an RKBA loony, I wouldn't know, fly....
Why don't you tell us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Another Guilt by Association/Personal Attack
Benchley, do you have anything of substance to contribute to the discussion today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Gee, slack, you lie down with AshKKKroft
and see what you get....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Guilt by Association
Seems to be your second favorite fallacious argument.

Do you have anything constructive or instructive to add to the discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Just pointing out birds of a feather
Now go cry about it to somebody who gives a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yup, that's guilt by association and a personal attack.
Claiming that John Ashcroft and I have anything in common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Gee, slack, who's that pimping AshKKKroft's views
why...it's you and the rest of the RKBA crowd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. More guilt by association
Got substance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. When you don't have a leg to stand on the the debate
A basic argumentum ad hominem will get you through the day.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/personal-attack.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, we could tell from your "crock of shit" comment
that you didn't have anything but hot air, slack....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Earlier today you said us RKBA types
cound not handle reality, what is your excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Dems, I'M not the one pimping for AshKKKroft
that would be the RKBA crowd....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. More Guilt by Association
Classic example of the time-tested bogus argument.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/guilt-by-association.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Gee, slack...you pimp for AshKKKroft
and I'll associate with decent people....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I've never met Mr. Ashcroft
So cut the crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And yet you pimp for his idiotic views
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Another personal attack
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, Benchley. If Ashcroft wants to go with a strict interpretation of a very simple, clearly written law in this case that's fine with me. That position is protective of peoples' privacy. If someone is suspected of terrorism the FBI can get all kinds of information without going on a fishing expidition through data that is required by law to be discarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Nope, just an acccurate description
"If Ashcroft wants to go with a strict interpretation of a very simple, clearly written law in this case that's fine with me."
So tell us, how do you feel about his revisionist assertion that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to own guns?

"That position is protective of peoples' privacy."
Yeah, to hell with public safety when guns are involved. Some swell position, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Finally your fallacious responses are getting more interesting
So tell us, how do you feel about his revisionist assertion that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to own guns?

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a Red Herring!

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html

I've always liked canned fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Gee, slack, dodging the question?
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 10:45 AM by MrBenchley
Never mind...we already knew all along you WERE pimping AshKKroft's nutcase views here.....as is the rest of the RKBA crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. No, avoiding your obvious smoke screen
You've been caught with your pants down advocating a position that is inconsistent with obeying the law, and are unable to admit that you were ignorant of that law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Yeah, surrrrrrrre....now go pimp for AshKKKroft and
his nutcase views elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And still you don't even try to address my point
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 03:49 PM by slackmaster
I quoted the actual text of the law that prohibits NICS data from being used for the proposed purpose. That safeguard was intentionally put into the Brady Act to prevent NICS from being used (i.e. abused) to create a gun registry.

If you don't like it your time might be better spent lobbying to get the law changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Gee, slack, I'm not even going to bother
with that pantload...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Another Appeal to Ridicule
You think the LAW is a pantload?

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. No, slack
I think your post is a pantload.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I quote applicable law and you call it a pantload
What's the problem MrB? Do you disagree with the law? Think the cited source does not accurately quote the law? Think it's not really applicable (and if so why don't you explain why)??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yup, I do...
Now go tell someone else what a good job AshKKKroft is doing...and I'll keep telling the truth....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Your replies have no substance at all
You have made no attempt to address the legal issues I have pointed out. All you have is personal attacks, guilt by association, and straw men. If I taught a debating class I'd use your contributions here as examples of how not to conduct a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yeah, surrrrrrrrre.....
Now go snivel to someone who cares about what a good job AshKKKroft is doing...

"If I taught a debating class"
Your students would be at a severe disadvantage in any debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. And another empty personal attack
You are the Ninja Master indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Interesting link...
...looks like it was aimed at high school students. Benchley will have to work at it awhile to get up to that level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Looks like it's run by high school students too
"No web site is configured at this address."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC