|
Grew up in the country, hunters in the family etc, own several weapons that remain at my parents' home.
Spent eight years in the military, found that the 16 is a great weapon for a small framed female and enjoyed the hell out of going to the range.
My major concerns were related to personal experiences. My mother and father got in an argument when I was about five years old. One of them was holding a loaded .22 and in the struggle, the rifle discharged and nearly killed me. In addition, I am a pediatric ICU nurse and I cannot tell you how many kids I have cared for, or wrapped for the morgue, because of STUPID PEOPLE. My argument was not with weapons per se, but with the need to keep them out of the hands of morons. Unfortunately, there is no way to do so under the Constitution. You can only deal with these a$$holes after the damage is done.
What finally convinced me was the bloodless coup. Please note that I am not now advocating armed rebellion. Part of me thinks that that is sort of silly, because it would be pretty damned hard for the average citizen to hold off someone with tanks, etc. Still, I now have respect for that argument.
The other thing that I have trouble accepting is the "must be armed for self defense". Not denying anyone's right....just never understood the fear factor. In 50+ years, over 20 spent in high crime, inner city areas, I have never felt threatened enough to consider arming myself...I know, knock on wood.
Guess that doesn't answer your question but I think that taking people to the range and allowing them to overcome their fears is WAY MORE effective than any of the NRA rhetoric.
|