Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Clinton COPS program phased out by Bush, firing) 118,000 new officers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 12:56 PM
Original message
(Clinton COPS program phased out by Bush, firing) 118,000 new officers
Federal, local cuts pull cops off streets A federal program paid for 118,000 new officers, but it's being phased out just as cities are in need

By Kevin Johnson USA TODAY

MINNEAPOLIS -- The federal program that added more than 100,000 cops to local police forces and helped to cut crime to historically low rates during the past decade is being rolled back because local governments can't afford to keep many of the officers on the street.

The Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program was a hallmark of the Clinton administration, providing more than $8 billion in grants to saturate crime-plagued areas with officers and forging unprecedented ties between cops and neighborhood patrols. From New York to Los Angeles, ''community policing'' became a symbol of America's frustration with the high crime rates of the early 1990s -- and of governments' big spending in a soaring economy.
But now budgets are leaner, and law enforcement analysts say that the largest federally funded buildup of local police in U.S. history is being washed away by cutbacks and retirements.

The COPS program, which is being phased out by the federal government, has provided grants to pay for all or part of entry-level officers' salaries during their first three years of work. Agencies that received COPS grants were required to keep the officers for a fourth year. Now, many cash-strapped police departments that have met their obligation to the grants program are trimming their ranks to meet increasingly tight local budgets. <snip>

http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20031202/5722772s.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remember
it was a constant refrain during the Clinton years from Limbaugh, Faux Nutcase Noise, the Washington Times, and all the other right wing slimebags that this program didn't really add 100,000 cops......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And the $8 billion in grants sure doesn't sound like
an "unfunded mandate" that they were screaming about also.

I remember some screams about "how will the communities pay for it???" going on about that also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was supposed to end in 2001
From the article:
"The COPS program was scheduled to end in 2001, when its initial allotment of money had been distributed. But it has survived the change in administration on much more modest budgets, mostly because of its popularity with the powerful law enforcement lobby."
another tid bit:
"* In Minneapolis, $6 million in COPS grants allowed the police department to hire 81 cops and boost the city's number of officers to 938 by 1997. But officials have had to cut 140 positions since then -- including 38 this year. Officers are being shifted from neighborhoods to handle emergency calls; robberies are up by 20% this year, and burglaries are up 3%. "




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. well Ill agree with Bush on this one
i dont like to agree with Bush, and I virtually never have. But we don't need more pigs on the streets, in fact, the less the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Amen to that
I got pulled over yesterday on my way home from work. No reason given he only asked what i was doing in his state (i have out of state plates still) and a bunch of questions about what i had been doing that day.(where my job was, who owned the house, how did i get the job) Then of course came the car search. It wasnt too bad though, i didnt have to stand out in the cold. When he asked if he could search the trunk i popped it open, he knew then that i didnt have anything to hide and hurried the process up. Didnt even search the front of the car. Lovely to be in Kansas again. If my drivers license wasnt suspended i wouldnt have been so cooperative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC