Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas close behind N.J. for dangerous schools

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 01:45 PM
Original message
Texas close behind N.J. for dangerous schools
Aug. 5, 2003, 10:31AM
Texas close behind N.J. for dangerous schools
Associated Press
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/2028317


FORT WORTH - Six of Texas' 7,734 public schools have been identified as "persistently dangerous," and students there may be transferred to safer schools if they wish, state education officials said.

*SNIP*

Of the states that have released names of their dangerous schools, only New Jersey, with seven, has reported more than Texas.

The low number of schools, both statewide and nationally, reported as being dangerous has some school security experts concerned that the new federal law is causing education officials to hide problems rather than fix them.

"Principals are going to be thinking twice about reporting crime knowing that this label of `persistently dangerous' is hanging over their heads. That's the kiss of death to their career," said Kenneth Trump, executive director of the Ohio-based National School Safety and Security Services.

*SNIP*


TEA created this year's list to comply with the federal No Child Left Behind law, which was passed in 2002. It requires each state to define and to provide a list of persistently dangerous schools by the start of the 2003-04 school year.

Each state also was to develop a policy giving students who attend such schools -- or who have been victims of crime on campus -- the right to transfer to another school within the same district. TEA has asked the U.S. Department of Education if siblings of crime victims also can transfer to a safer school.

*SNIP*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. New Jersey Has More People, Texas Has More Guns
Are any of you reaching the same conclusion that I did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gun crimes or possession of a gun on school property is...
...fairly rare here. My cynical take on it is that the gang members drop out early. We do have a lot of problems with other weapons though. Just recently one young girl was stabbed to death in a crowded hallway by her ex-boyfriend...who was such bad news he should have never been in a regular school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. here's how they got that number:
To receive the label, each reported at least three mandatory expulsions per 1,000 students for the school years beginning in 1999, 2000 and 2001, state officials said.

That's it. I went to elementary, middle, and high school in Texas. Sure there were bad kids, but it was easy to get suspended, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreadNot Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. more people in Jersey?
Population of New Jersey = 8,414,350
Population of Texas = 20,851,820

Source: US Census
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. My Mistake
NJ has a higher population DENSITY than Texas. And I'm sure Texas has a higher GUN density than New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schnellfeuer Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Texas has twice the population,
and in your words "gun density", and the PRNJ is #1. Why do you think that is?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What is "PRNJ"???
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schnellfeuer Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Peolples Republic of New Jersey
but of course! :)

We in PA consider the border to be the Delaware river. There was even a sign on one of the interstates on the PA side welcoming you to the USA. :) Signs on the Appalachian Trail on the PRNJ side as you cross the Water Gap at the river pretty much say it all. They read..
No Camping, No Fires, No Picnicking, No Pets, etc. At the base of every sign, someone wrote in marker....NO FUN. That pretty much sums it up. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's a National Rec Area
Don't blame the Garden State - blame the Dept of the Interior, especially head honcho Gale Norton, the second-worst thing to come out of Colorado after Focus On The Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schnellfeuer Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I was refering to the Jersey part
of the trail, not the Federal reserve, which is actually on both sides. These were PRNJ signs. Speaking of the Feds and their parks, the Water Gap made the top ten 10 unsafe parks list. Its #8.

http://www.rangerfop.com/danger03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Wow...
Gun nut rhetoric in all its silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schnellfeuer Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Please do enlighten us
what "Gun nut rhetoric in all its silliness." might that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreadNot Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. gun density
It is well known that guns are far more common in rural Anerica than in urban America, and yet the murder rate in urban America is far higher than in rural America.

Why is that?

A lot of people focus on guns, but it really seems to miss the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC