|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
veganlush
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 10:41 PM Original message |
The Second Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. I have posted that thought about information systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 10:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree with you about the transparency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. It isn't pro-civil rights people redefining things as they see fit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
26. Please define "gun lobby," providing examples of "things"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
59. If what was in use by private citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. But the the 1907 Hague Treaty which REQUIRES DIRECT MILITARY COMMAND. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. I think it would be pretty awesome to have one of those "active denial systems." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 10:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm sorry, I couldn't help it!..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. so what's the answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. You are repeating common canards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. so if I just keep on reading in this forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 12:56 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Yep, you could search nuke in the guns forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 01:16 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. you can't call it silly until and unless you can provide an answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 05:56 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I can call it anything I wish... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 08:22 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Would it help if I pointed out suitcase nukes don't actually exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 09:17 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. The U.S. did make them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. 5 minutes would have been enough, if you had a vehicle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
61. it's beside the point. The technology will come for smaller and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. I think you've presented a false choice of extremes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. We could draw the line at stuff covered by international arms limitation treaties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Well, treaties can't go against the constitution.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. Ahh, this thread found its way home to the proper forum..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. as for the RKBA it DOES NOT MATTER who is the "well regulated militia" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
9. Sarah said 'arms' meant 'votes'... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
10. It is as moot, obsolete and silly as three-fifths of a person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 05:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. No, national defense is covered in the clause that allows the raising of a regular army and navy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. If no words are redundant, then "...being necessary to the security of a free State.." aren't either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. I'm thinking you would fall in line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. The Second Amendment is outmoded & has been superceded by newer laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Again, how comfy you must be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Better to have faith in We The People as a real American then fear them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 10:28 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Well, most of the people on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 10:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Unfortunately for you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
63. The "darkies," as you put it, were the very objects of gun-prohibition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 08:33 AM Response to Reply #36 |
54. Correct, but not in the way you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 06:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Then begin lobbying for repeal for krist steak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:14 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Repeal is not the answer. An enlightened judiciary is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. So you are a fan of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 08:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Once again, shares comes in to bait. So cometh my standard reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Do you support subterfuge, the darling of Jim Crow? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 08:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
24. It is in the constitution, therefore it is relevant, by definition. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Spoken like a good G. W. Bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Sooooo, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
15. They meant individual arms of whatever technology was available |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
18. Well, state of the art at the time was magazine fed repeating arms, powered by expanding gas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. Key phrase: "the right of the people" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
23. It is an individual right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. so do you think the authors of the second amendment would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Nope. It was racist and designed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Probably not, but it is a compromise that I am willing to make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
25. The never-ending story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Flamethrowers are agricultural tools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. You're always hot to find an exception! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Sure am! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Used to be an old Sherman in a park in Palatka, FL. Gone now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
28. I look forward to continued engagement on this subject. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. I have posted mostly on political issues, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shedevil69taz
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. Mostly we here in this guns forum try to discourage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowman
![]() |
Sun Apr-04-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. I know what you mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #43 |
64. Thanks again for your posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Apr-03-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
37. No need for you to worry about such things, read DC v. Heller & discover what SCOTUS said, that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorfle
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
60. Some corrections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
62. The average personal arms for the average foot soldier to fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC