|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:45 PM Original message |
If you're in favor of ending the "Gun Show Loophole" . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. What loophole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I believe a background check should be perforned regardless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. It is a loophole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. There's nothing 'gun show' specific about it, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Agreed, it is individual to individual purchases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. There's another thread right here in the gungeon talking about how to open NICS to individuals.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travis Coates
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. And you think criminals (who buy their guns illegally now) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unrepentant Fenian
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 03:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
62. It would stop them from buying guns at gun shows if the sellers got busted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 12:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. That is simply not true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. No, it does not allow what you say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 08:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Define "too many," then provide evidence for your assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. With a Texas CHL no NCIS call is needed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
68. And newspaper classified ads, and family members, and flea markets, and garage sales and estate sale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 01:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
72. Actually the FBI says only 1% of felons buy guns from a gun show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:03 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Directly, yes. But there may be more links in the supply chain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rgbecker
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I think the gun shows provide a "store" of "marketplace" for the sale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. 1.9% of guns used in crome came from such sources. (see link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 06:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. It's not "don't have to do"; it's "can't do" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. So how many "gun-convicts" get their guns from gun shows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
69. A 'store' full of off and on duty, and retired law enforcement officials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. As it turns out, even if every gun show sale required a NICS check, Robyn Anderson was 18 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. Your OP is vague unless you state all gun sales at gun shows must pass a NICS check & a loophole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think a better solution is to open up NICS to calls from private sellers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Would an ID card complete with DNA sample, fingerprint, retina scan etc. help? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'm not following you, Jody? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. I see Bloomie's at it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's actually a private sales loophole ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 02:46 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Excellent point here. In the mailer I received from the Brady Bunch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Almost everything the Brady Campaign publishes is misleading ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. The "Brady" group was organized and is led by republicans who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 02:12 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Cool! You're recommending a thread where the pro-control agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
29. I agree. Another controller/prohibition argument splintered. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travis_0004
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. Whatever hapened to the commerce clause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 07:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. If they try, that will be one of the challenges. A better way would be to allow instant check for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. If two private citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 06:01 AM Response to Original message |
23. Can only be done state by state, at the state level, can't be done federally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
30. OH, wait, "mayor against guns..." Isn't that a Bloomie? A Republican? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_B_Jackson
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. Not really..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
32. This is just bullshit - residents of many states have the right to sell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
34. RRequiring background checks in the building but not the parking lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Great idea! Kick up a thread where the OP is destroyed and which features |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. "Destroyed" . . . ? It's from an ad on the HOME page . . . !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. So the fact that it's on the home page somehow validates it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. DU'ers have an opportunity to vote -- does that bother you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Hard to know where to start in response, but I'll give it a shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Good -- because what I was doing was pointing out that they had an opportunity to vote.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. "So -- pick your heroes and pick sides -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Does the GOP/NRA use members' money to target Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 12:17 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Only when those Democrats oppose Second Amendment Rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #60 |
74. So GOP/NRA attacks Democrats who support 2nd with members' money . . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. And where you could have started was with hitting the link . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. The problem with that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Not the poll . . . the supporting info which has been suggested wasn't there ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. No, the mayors are lying again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Again, the post was intended to reply to those who suggested there was no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Simply saying that it has to be closed has been going on since 1993 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Petition: "Background checks for ALL SALES at Gun Shows "-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. And as I have already said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Sign the Petition and let's have Congress tell us what you're saying .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-25-10 11:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. They already have told us, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Why not post that response so we can all read it -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Exactly what is it you don't understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. You're presenting merely an "argument" . . . what does Congress say . . .??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Disagree with opponents of the Act . . . does Congress . . . ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. You assume a great deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-24-10 10:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. So . . . did you find supporting information at the link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
41. This old fail comes trotting out again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
61. Would we still be able to buy the alien technology you brought to our attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. You're talking about the Stephen Hawking thread . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. I am referring to your habit of posting your beliefs as established fact... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. ...and everything you post is backed up by "evidence" . . . ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat
![]() |
Wed Apr-28-10 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
76. ..it proves you don't have a clue.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC