|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
RandySF
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:13 PM Original message |
The shooter fired 31 shots from an extended clip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. it is legal only in AZ I was told |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Original message |
What isn't legal in AZ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
7. Mexicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agent William
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
51. Ka-blammo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Not true. I own a 31-round Glock magazine legally, in California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. goody for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Back at you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. i won't question the legality of your ownership of a 31 round magazine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Please take a look at my profile before you start impugning my "wisdom" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. my statement stands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. What's unwise about me owning it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. a weapon capable of that much destruction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. The collection value is the ONLY reason I own that, or most of what is in my collection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. And who's the Secretary of Need? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. you're wasting your time if you think it's fruitful to discuss ownership of his weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Perhaps you missed my point, let me reverse it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
66. Tell us about your mysterious "rationalization of such ownership." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. well how easy was it for thugs to get assault weapons in a society where they are so available? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. "Assault Weapons" Do you know anything about which you speak? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:59 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. don't make this about terminology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. That is any gun other than a derringer, single shot shotgun, or bolt action rifle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. well by saying that, you support banning of some types of guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. No, I was merely adding reality to your broad-brush statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Not willing to ban a single, solitary gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:14 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. That's your definition of 'reasonable'? Thanks for confirming it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. i never used the word "reasonable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:24 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. By the logic you expressed in post 85, that makes you 'unreasonable' then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. are you willing to ban even one type/kind/even model of gun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Did I stutter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:43 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. okay this is a waste of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:26 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. In other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 01:53 AM Response to Reply #101 |
109. don't misrepresent me, i've been debating here in this forum continuously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. What would banning 'even just one' accomplish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:16 PM Response to Reply #93 |
107. There are some that ARE already banned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_B_Jackson
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #93 |
108. Ok, you've convinced me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #87 |
97. I am not willing to ban ANY item. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. OK, how about a howitzer. Legal to own, slow rate of fire, massive damage capability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. i don't know what specific weapons should be banned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #88 |
99. Ugh, seriously? Howitzers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #83 |
100. So all of them, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
64. I think you are searching for enemies. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:20 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. I'm searching for people willing to make responsible choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. I'm not armed, CreekDog. I own a 31-round Glock magazine. It's kept locked up in a big safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. I on the other hand am armed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Nope, vast majority of the US states allow them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. Well, you were told wrong NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Probably a 30 round clip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Its legal in AZ and in most states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Thanks a pantload, NRA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
39. So I guess you don't approve of my 75 round AK47 magazine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:02 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Or the 250rd belts for my semi-auto 1919a2? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
50. I carry a total of 46 rounds at all times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
67. Solution to extended magazine ban: more magazines. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. And he had another clip with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. Only 11 or so states have any restriction on magazine size. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. This long: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Not at all easy to conceal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #10 |
40. now that the gun control authoritarians are zeroing in on the large cap magazines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. Ban fast cars! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
12. Glock makes 33 round clip that will fit that handgun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. isn't it great? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. The shooter in yesterday's incident violated numerous Arizona state laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. not until it was too late |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Criminal laws are always and will always be "too late" to prevent crimes from happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
49. well then why bother with these ineffective laws at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
69. Like the movies, "this is where we came in," Warren. Give us some answers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #49 |
102. Because laws set up the legal conditions to punish those who cause harm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
68. What would you have done to prevent it's being "too late?" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. a fucking nut job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. I can't ban nut jobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:33 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Explain to me please!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Nothing is perfect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #48 |
70. You said it best: "I can't ban nut jobs." (that's because bans don't work) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #48 |
76. What is easier than arson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
103. Ah, yes. Having a law makes breaking that law difficult. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:05 PM Response to Reply #48 |
105. a total ban, yes that works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity556
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:34 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. re:I can't ban nut jobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. so you are in favor of nuts with concealed glocks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. I'm in favor of you not stripping my ability to do something about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. so no license, anyone can carry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. In my state, a license is required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. does a car bomber really care if he's double-parked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. By all means, point one out, that was caught for such. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #60 |
75. smoking and illegally parked. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. It was smoking because it didn't properly detonate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #81 |
96. The sytem worked ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
82. You really must need some caffeine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
71. Well, in Vermont, any sane, non-felon can carry. HUGE CRIME RATE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
104. Works for Vermont. For over 200 years, please note. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. Apparently, the day the were doing NICS checks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. "Here is what I can do" Sorry, #2 and #3, you can't do, ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. I just want you to be coherent while you rant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Automatic weapons are not banned, and only 2 states ban concealed carry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Full auto banned for most people since 1934 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #56 |
80. Are you fine with a test to proove that you "need" to vote? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 02:20 AM Response to Reply #56 |
110. Need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kudzu22
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
62. If by "many" you mean "two". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:14 PM Response to Reply #62 |
106. and wisconsin allows open carry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. You missed a point: repealing the Fourth Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #44 |
65. We like to call this ......... "The Freedom Pat " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kudzu22
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
61. One out of three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. Personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. Gee I guess that my semi auto 1919a2 ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. I have one in the glovebox of my car. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
35. btw... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
42. and in 2 seconds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoyt
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
45. We need to make carrying in public like smoking a big, stinking cigar or drinking/driving. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #45 |
72. If it's concealed, how would you adjudge the size and stink? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
52. And for those focused on the mag capacity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Francis Marion
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
111. It's a magazine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC