|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:21 PM Original message |
Military style assault weapons can still be sold to loonies like Loughner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. The AWB banned nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. We should also ban airplanes and cars, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
38. I pointed out before that availability of guns has an inverse relationship to violence and murder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sorry but the handgun Loughner used is not an assault weapon. Please don't embarrass yourself by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Don't embarrass yourself by not using your reading skills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. You stated "semi-automatic assault weapons" and informed people know that's an oxymoron. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. What you're doing is no different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
46. Since the Bradys are GOP, it's a win-win for 'em. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
44. Actually the Assault Weapons Ban governed high capacity ammo clips |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pullo
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Wrong. Those magazines were readily available during the AWB, legally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. What makes them "highly lethal" compared to non-assault weapons? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. The number of bullets that can be shot in the space of seconds. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Semi automatic weapons (of all types) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The age of the technology is irrelevant. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. No it's really not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. No, it's clearly not that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Rate of fire is the same. Range of magazine capacities is the same. Ammunition is the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Your job OP, if you choose to accept it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Show me where I lied. You can't. Try reading my actual post, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. You may not have, but Helmke did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The poster accused me of lying. S/he obviously did not read my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HALO141
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. O RLY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. No, the poster did NOT accuse you of lieing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Whatever you are discussing, the OP is discussing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. It sure is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. You have not shown how "military style assault weapons" would have been worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. semi-automatic military-style weapons not "military assault weapons" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. We're talking about the most popular target rifles in the United States, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 12:11 AM Response to Reply #14 |
40. The "assault weapons" you want to ban are not used by ANY military. Never have been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 01:57 AM Response to Reply #14 |
41. Accuracy, reliability, and good ergonomics are not for civilians? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. By quoting a group w/Republican origins, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. Usual crap from the Brady Bunch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bossy22
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. this is a silly what-if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. And he would have been a Hell of a lot harder to stop NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:21 AM Response to Reply #16 |
43. Small correction there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pancho Sanza
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
21. You're obviously passionate about guns, which is your right. What exactly do you propose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. "I might mention here that if eliminating guns is something you think would be desirable (or even" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Deleted message |
Tejas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. They'll show up at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
28. Gasoline can still be sold to loonies like Loughner, too, and he could have made fire bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
29. Bottom line... most legal firearms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
33. Per the FBI, rifles (including "assault weapons") are the LEAST misused class of weapon in the USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
34. Check the FBI's firearm data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
Euromutt
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
42. And if my sister had a pair of nuts, she'd be my brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. Source citing from a GOP-founded, GOP-led group? Jeez... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC