|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:37 PM Original message |
Whoops she did it again Rachel states the AWB didn't prohibit sale of "extended clips" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. It always amazes me how people can be so obtuse and dishonest one this one single issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I know it's almost lke they had an agenda or something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Nah, couldn't POSSIBLY be that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It's easy to stick to liberal principles when the topic is GLBT rights, abortion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. AWB banned importing and manufacturing new ammunition feeding devices that held more than 10 rounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Her own words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. To be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. It's Right there in the OP. she's saying both that the shooter would and would not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. begin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Uh-huh...whatever you say, there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Please see post 9 NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
15. Anybody can make a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. It prohibited the sale of new magazines, but existing ones... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You are close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. New magazines manufactured before the date of the ban... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. She never said he couldn't buy a magazine retail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. The 10 round mag rule brought back the 45....that's the only good thing the AWB did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. Rachel is wrong but were you as upset at the NRA when they lied about Obama? n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. That's not the topic.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Have you seem me defend Rachel at all? n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. You were defending her this past weekend.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Not defending her gun stance, defending her as a real progressive. It amazes me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. "This place is not really what I would call a haven for the progressive movement" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-10-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #33 |
52. this is the gun forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-10-11 12:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
54. Nobody was attacking her simply for being progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. He asked you a very specific question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Not on the gun issue. But you seem to think that is all that matters with her. disgusting. n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. So do you give her a pass to lie on other issues? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. LOL....except the NRA lies. They are "different". n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Please don't hijack my thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. The NRA was able to cite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. How can they be correct in predicting the future????? They said Obama would use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. The NRA stated that Obama had a long record of voting anti gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. So you defend the NRA lying about Obama in 2008 and in 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rl6214 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-10-11 12:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
53. You need to read what he said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. So you are saying this is a factual statement...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. How about we get back on topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. You started defending the NRA. Not me. Answer the question. n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. As soon as you start a thread about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. That is the answer I expected. Carry on. n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. I never gave the NRA the same credence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. You should at least be as outraged as you are with Rachel. n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. i know exacty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Exactly. There is a fundamental difference between NEWS and the NRA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-10-11 07:44 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. NRA is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-10-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. That's exactly what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. Please do not allow her to derail this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
49. Since you made the comparison: do you feel we should consider the two to be equally objective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
45. Wow, the lack of interest in truth in certain quarters is disturbing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
46. Why honesty in the media is so important ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Wish I could rec a post. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oneka (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Very well written post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-09-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. One thing that really chaps my ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC