Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Newark Officer Is Killed in a Drive-By Shooting", How?? New Jersey limits gun sales!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:13 AM
Original message
"Newark Officer Is Killed in a Drive-By Shooting", How?? New Jersey limits gun sales!!!
Here we go again. New Jersey limits gun sales and also has no practical concealed carry laws but criminals still obtain guns and shoot innocent citizens. And the antis still think preventing honest, law abiding citizens from carry guns is ok. No way carry concealed will prevent every death, like the one in this story, but the point is that restrictive gun laws only prevent honest citizens from having guns, not criminals.



NEWARK — The night before he was to give his younger daughter a birthday party, Police Officer William C. Johnson went out for pizza and never came home. He died early Friday, apparently a random victim of a drive-by shooting.

Someone fired five or six shots into Texas Fried Chicken and Pizza on Thursday night, blowing out the front window, gouging bullet holes into walls, injuring two people and mortally wounding Officer Johnson, a single father of two who was off duty.

The police said that none of the three victims was the intended target, making this the sort of sudden, unexplained violence that has long been a scourge of this city.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/nyregion/off-duty-newark-police-officer-shot-dead.html

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've never heard anyone say,
"rape still occurs, even though there are laws against it. Legalize rape!"

That would be an incredibly stupid argument.

Wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Consider the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I've never heard anyone say,
Becuase rape occurs let's ban legal penis owners from owning penises either
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Perfect, the problem is the antis do not use logic. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. again the penis/gun confusion
For some reason I need to keep explaining that there are significant differences between penises and guns. Why is it that pro-gun people can't seem to understand this?

For one thing, I was born with my penis, it is part of my body. Penis removal would be a fairly uncomfortable medical procedure. Even for convicted rapists I'm not in favor of castration, because that falls in the "cruel and unusual" category.

Penises have multiple functions, unlike guns. Penises are used for excreting bodily waste, reproduction, and hours of entertainment. Guns put holes in things. That's all they do.

So if "logical" believes that "logic" dictates that penises and guns should be treated the same way by the legal system...perhaps he should change his name to "batshit crazy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. unusual analogy granted,
hours of entertainment? Never mind. As far as tangents go, rape is about power not sex, so castration would not cure the problem, but may change the weapon (although I some accounts of eunuchs, never mind.) Pedophiles, I think castration is a good idea because it can not be cured, or at least at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. But your gun logic to prevent rape would be to outlaw sex. Get it now?? n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. A better comparison would be anti erect penis groups.
Ban erections in public but I suspect that a rapist will still get an erection despite being in a no erection zone. So penis control laws are rather useless apart from punishing misuse of the penis which we already do. Having a gun is perfectly fine, but if it is misused that's when legal action should be taken just like having a penis is fine but once it is misused then legal action should be taken. Having a rope is fine but once someone strangles a victim with it then legal action is taken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. You're confusing a crime with something used to commit the crime.
Edited on Sat May-28-11 10:54 AM by aikoaiko
"rape still occurs, even though there are laws against it. Legalize rape!" would be very stupid argument and the analogous argument was not made for legal gun ownership.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. When rape occurs we blame the person doing it
when a murder occurs we blame the instrument (if it's a gun, the person if it's anything else).

How does that make any sense to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't matter how many people have a CCL
criminals will still get guns and they will kill people with those guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Number of guns matter
The more guns out there the more guns there are to be stolen. Where do people who carry guns leave them when they have to enter a No Gun Zone? In their car and cars are very easy to steal from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. There are quite a few safes designed especially for securing a gun in a car
and many gun owners use them.

What do you think criminals do when they have to enter a No Gun Zone ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Too late to fix that issue. 90 million handguns in circilation and please propose a way....
to prevent all gun sales that passes the senate, house does not get vetoed and passes the SCOUS. No politicans want to ban gun sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You forgot
passes the senate, house does not get vetoed and passes the SCOUS and doesn't start a war
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. True. How anyone can propose banning guns a this point is beyond me. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. True, so no need to oppose CCW laws for everyone. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe he picked it up
in Virginia. Anyone with a pulse can get a gun in Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. And oddly, Virginia has a lower crime rate than it's close neighbors...
with much stricter gun laws.

So what, exactly, was your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. and on top of that
he would be committing a federal crime because current federal gun control laws make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Do you really think he gives a shit?
"Oh no, it's illegal for me to buy this gun in order to commit a crime in another State... Perhaps I should rethink my current life choices?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It is illegal to sell it to him too
but you proved our point for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Obviously we need to protect ourselves and our loved ones
from criminals who will possess guns no matter what the laws say. The odd thing about the antis, and something I just can't understand, is they're apparently just fine with unarming law abiding citizen, while allowing armed crooks to run free to do their damage..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. True. They seem more worried about CCW holders than criminals. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. "The city laid off about 13 percent of its officers last fall" They have made tragedy inevitable
There is no one to blame except politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Cut police force by 14% and murders go up by 71%
Sounds like criminals have been empowered and law abiding citizens are intimidated from owning guns and self defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MyrnaLoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. more importantly
it goes to show even a police officer carrying a weapon openly can't defend himself so why do we think a concealed one is any better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yes all people are helpless against the mighty criminal. No one can respond in time...
Edited on Thu Jun-02-11 04:55 PM by ileus
Not even cops...ever. never.....no not ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Because they seem to have a better success rate than harsh language and tactical pleading?
We know that wearing a seat belt is not a guarantee that you will survive any and all car crashes.

Would you seriously argue that we should therefore not bother to wear them at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Sometimes even people who go to doctors die, clearly doctors are useless
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Check this cat out
The death of a Bexar County sheriff's sergeant who died in a hail of gunfire as he sat in his patrol car is being investigated for a possible connection to Mexico's drug cartels, county officials said on Tuesday.

Sergeant Kenneth Vann was "targeted because he represented the government," Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz told Reuters.

Vann, 48, was in uniform, sitting in his marked patrol car at a corner on San Antonio's southeast side early Saturday when a small white car pulled up beside him, and somebody in the car fired an estimated 28 shots from an automatic weapon, possibly an AK-47 rifle, Ortiz said. No suspects are in custody.

"I think that they picked on a police officer because he was a symbol of authority," Ortiz said on Tuesday.

He said there is no evidence Vann's movements had been tracked that morning, indicating the 24-year law enforcement veteran was not likely targeted personally. Ortiz called it an attack "on a random law enforcement officer."

"The general public, I don't think, should have that much to fear," Ortiz said.

/////

Enjoy "it" while it lasts .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. All NJ gangbangers have to do is go to Virginia, pay a straw buyer and get what they want
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. my guess is that there is a middle man between the straw buyer and the gang bangers
but if you want to take away their guns, I still say take away their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC