Can someone please explain the bolded part of the following quotation to me? Pretty please with a cherry on top? (I won't be able to come back for a few hours, but I will come back.)
Gang Activity
State Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago, has been a vocal opponent of the concealed-carry law, arguing that the legislation could result in more innocent bystanders being hurt during a shooting incident. She contends that concealed carry makes sense in more rural parts of the state where children grow up around guns and know how to safely use them for hunting and recreational activities.
In Chicago, however, gang activity is pervasive and a concealed-carry law would only add to the number of guns that are being carried on the street, Davis said. She added that an educational program needs to be developed for urban children to learn more about responsible gun use.
“This is going to increase the number of guns available,” Davis said, adding that she does not believe the concealed-carry law will be approved during this fall’s veto session.
“If we could do something to stop these gang members from shooting and killing each other, I would support (the bill).”--
http://www.journalstandard.com/highlight/x724665317/Concealed-carry-NRA-officials-hope-law-will-be-approved-in-the-fallWhat?!!! Gang members don't have carry permits. If there is an exception, he won't after his first felony conviction. What do gang bangers have to do with CCW? Why should an honest black man who has managed to keep a perfect felony record while living in the 'hood (or in Illinois for that matter) be penalized for the crimes of others? For that matter, why should an old asian woman be punished because of gang bangers?
In what way does it make sense to make stopping criminals from harming each other a prerequisite for allowing the innocent to have the tools to defend themselves from crime?
I think critical thinking / logic should be a required subject to graduate high school. I really hope this woman was misquoted or misrepresented.