Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PENNSYLVANIA: Governor Signs Castle Docrine Bill Into Law.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:14 PM
Original message
PENNSYLVANIA: Governor Signs Castle Docrine Bill Into Law.
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 10:20 PM by GreenStormCloud
http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=15275

Governor Tom Corbett has signed Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine legislation into law. This common-sense measure permits law-abiding citizens to use force, including deadly force, against an attacker in their home and any place where they have a legal right to be. It also protects individuals from civil lawsuits by an attacker or attacker’s family when force is used.

“Gov. Corbett and Pennsylvania lawmakers know that law-abiding citizens must have the right to protect themselves when criminals attack without fear of being second-guessed by an overzealous prosecutor,” said Chris W. Cox, executive director, National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action. “Crime victims don’t have the luxury of time when confronted by a criminal and must be able to count on the law being on their side. This new law accomplishes that by removing any mandate of forcible retreat.”

The NRA has led the nationwide movement to pass Castle Doctrine legislation, beginning with Florida in 2005. Pennsylvania is the 27th state to adopt this important measure with overwhelming bipartisan support. House Bill 40, sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-92), passed by a 164 to 37 margin. Richard Alloway, II (R-33), sponsored the companion bill to HB 40, Senate Bill 273, which passed 43-4.

“I am very gratified that Governor Corbett has signed this legislation into law, correcting the grievous error made by the previous administration in denying these long-sought protections to our citizens,” said Rep. Perry. “There are many people who have worked hard to get this legislation to this point, and I am grateful to my House and Senate colleagues and to the National Rifle Association for their support. The time has finally come to return common sense and good judgment to state government, and this legislation is a step in that direction. A criminal should never have an advantage over a citizen who abides by the rules of decent society, and today, we finally achieved the goal of returning the right of self-defense to the law-abiding.”

SNIP -More at link


With those margins of victory, that means that many Democrats voted for it too.

The is is another advance for RKBA rights. It is the fourth state have the governor sign an NRA backed law in the past couple of weeks. We are on a roll.
Refresh | +16 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if that includes warrantless entry by the Police?
I am hardly NRA and believe in sensible weapons laws. This seems ok to me. We need that in CA. (When you are in your home, where can you retreat to?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it specifically says
you cannot resist a cop who is carrying out a criminal action against you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I would expect that if you don't know it's a cop and can prove it...
...in court, you might get away with it. If you know it's a cop, though... fix it in court afterwards. Get the cop fired, sue the force, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the only important part:
"1) The use of force is not justifiable under this
section:
(i) to resist an arrest which the actor knows is
being made by a peace officer, although the arrest is
unlawful"

ie. You cannot resist a police officer carrying out a criminal act against you.

This is a bad law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes it is bad. It kind of reminded me of this case
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. While I understand, I think the point is to cut off any potential loopholes.
Specifically, to make sure that nobody tries to claim shooting a cop as legal because they thought they were being arrested unlawfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. If you don't KNOW the aggressor is a peace officer...
then you're still covered by castle doctrine.
The grand jury has to prove the person knew it was a peace officer acting against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. No it's not.
The place to straighten out a bad arrest is in front of the Judge. If I have paper to arrest John Doe and somehow Mr. Doe has it in his head that his arrest is in error, I do not want it turning into a firefight. People get hurt that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I understand what you are saying, but I can't help but wonder....
if it might make police/judges/etc. a bit more contemplative/cautious if they knew armed resistance to illegal/improper procedures was legal and encouraged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. I don't know how much more cautious we can get.
It's the way of the world. People who obey the law obey the law and those who don't, well, they just don't. That goes for cops, lawyers, drug dealers, and whackos. Opening a hunting season on police who are playing by the rules isn't going to change that. I've had people tell me all sorts of wild legal theories about why my search or their arrest is unlawful. Do I want to give these people the option of using deadly force as a legal means of conflict resolution? We have courts for such matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh the noes, the backlash, what to do about the backlash
Good job PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Guns and Ammo in a persons home are impolite things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Not to mention tacky and uncivilized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. and just downright mean and hateful...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. R-Moran Tom Corbett signs stupid GOP Moran Gun Law sponsored by idiot GOP Morans
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:29 AM by jpak
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks jpak. We can always count on you...
...to come forward with the sputtering, spittle-filled enraged reply from the willfully ignorant of our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The GOP are assholes
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. lol, generally I would agree.
But even they are able to get it right once and a while. Dismissing policy out of hand simply because it was proposed by somebody from a different political party without considering the merits of the bill itself is not the actions of a rational minded person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. gun owners and our expanded rights are not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. What do you think of the Democrats who voted to pass this law?

This was, after all, a bipartisan effort.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. DINO's duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Who here is saying they aren't?
Doesn't mean gun control doesn't suck

BTW are these GOP members assholes?

Paul Helmke?

Michael Bloomberg?

Josh Sugerman?

Sarah Brady?

James Brady?

In your opinion of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I guess that post is allowed because of the R and the GOP qualifiers
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 04:48 PM by Tuesday Afternoon
you have outdone yourself jpak. kudos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
S_B_Jackson Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. The current makeup of the PA Senate includes 20 Democratic members
of these 20, only 5 share the type of knee-jerk, hoplophobia that you display daily. This isn't a left vs. right issue, nor even a Democrat vs. Republican issue - it is a matter of civil liberties and the recognition that the average law-abiding citizen should not be required by the state to surrender one inch before having the ability to defend themselves from a criminal assault/attack.

You apparently have greater compassion for the plight of the criminal who's job is made more difficult by citizen who believe they have a right not to be assaulted, robbed, or raped and are willing to act in their own defense. Better in your mind, it seems, that they simply cower in fear and surrender that which they've worked so hard to have, to those who would take it by force because they want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Straw Man Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
30. One wonders why you had to edit "yup."
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 01:26 AM by Straw Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. good news. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. Conservatives are AWESOME!
Stoopid Obama.

President Bachmann will put a chicken in every pot and a gun in every baby's diaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Lots of Democrats voted for that bill too. It was basically bipartisan.
But don't let facts stop you from a rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. And Democrats who understand *all* of the Constitution are even better!
You lot have given up on the "Rivers of blood will flow at the (insert venue of choice)!" meme, I take it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Great verbal judo move. You turned his own words against him. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Straw Man Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Catchphrases are LAME!
And so are faux progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Conservatives are AWESOME!
Conservatives such as these?

Paul Helmke?

Michael Bloomberg?

Josh Sugerman?

Sarah Brady?

James Brady?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
32. When does it go into effect?
I can't wait to use it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC