Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain says it's OK to use a knife or poker to defend your home.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:37 AM
Original message
Britain says it's OK to use a knife or poker to defend your home.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 08:41 AM by Atypical Liberal
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13957587

"Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has said a householder who knifes a burglar will not have committed a criminal offence under plans to clarify the law on self-defence in England.

He told the BBC people were entitled to use "whatever force necessary" to protect themselves and their homes.

...

Under the terms of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, homeowners who use "reasonable force" to protect themselves against intruders should not be prosecuted, providing they use no more force than is absolutely necessary.

...

But the government is set to place people's right to defend their property, long present in common law, in statute law.

"It's quite obvious that people are entitled to use whatever force is necessary to protect themselves and their homes," Mr Clarke said. We will make it quite clear you can hit the burglar with the poker if he's in the house and you have a perfect defence when you do so”

Asked about what this would mean in practice, he said: "If an old lady finds she's got an 18 year old burgling her house and she picks up a kitchen knife and sticks it in him she has not committed a criminal offence and we will make that clear."

He added: "We will make it quite clear you can hit the burglar with the poker if he's in the house and you have a perfect defence when you do so."


Well it's nice to see that Britain is at least somewhat coming to its senses and not penalizing people for defending themselves and their homes.

It's just a shame that the preferred method of defense is to engage in a physical contest of strength with your attacker. I guess for now UK subjects will have to settle for knives or fireplace pokers and hope they are stronger than whoever is assaulting them. At least old ladies can now go up against 18-year-olds with a kitchen knife and not worry about legal consequences.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jolly good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. .... and if there are two or three burglars you are sol
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. this is about the case where a gang of 4 men intruded.. and repelled by knife attack
1 of them died.

perhaps you meant when theres 5 or 6 =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. This guy beat the odds in a big way to say the least. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. And for every time that works, there's probably several times where the homeowner gets stabbed.
A knife is not a good defensive weapon at ALL. Even a baseball bat is far superior.

Sad that Britain is just now finally acknowledging that people have a right to protect themselves, rather than arresting and charging people who've done so, like they did in the past. Hopefully this will lead to even greater reforms including some actual privacy rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I get their point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. The point is that Britain is codifying what had been implicit in common law
...and pretty far from your weaponized fantasy editorializing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Implicit in "common law?"
Seems that the Crown has also taken to prosecuting homeowners who used force against burglars.

You must agree with the dead burglar's familiy: "On the night he was killed, the teenager had just been released on bail after being accused of stealing garden furniture. Barras' grandmother, Mary Dolan, stated: "It's not fair that the farmer has got all the money and he is the one that took Fred away."

A British man and his 27-year-old son could be charged with murder after an altercation with four burglars lead to the stabbing death of one of the intruders.

"A British burglar called police when the victim in the home he broke into shot him with an air rifle. Police arrested the homeowner."

"Two residents of England were recently sentenced to prison for beating a burglar senseless with a cricket bat that broke in two as they defended their home from a thug who broke into their home and put the family living there at risk. The burglar got probation."

"A British celebrity, Myleene Klass, who is a popular broadcaster and model, brandished an "illegal" kitchen knife, and ran off a band of young intruders who entered her property last year. Police have told her that they believed she acted illegally in showing the knife to defend the home."

"And now, the estate of a slain armed robber is suing for damages stemming from the criminal’s being shot and killed during the commission of a potential high dollar armed robbery. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's an answer, fat man, but it has no bearing on my post
You need a hobby, a real hobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Beats whining about boycotts.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=417619&mesg_id=417619

"If you don't want guns in your restaurant, just post a sign--THEN WE WILL BOYCOTT YOU

Watching you wheedle, whine and snivel is entertaining!

You need a new shirt...



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. What shitholes do you dine in? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. What a hoot!!!
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 08:10 PM by one-eyed fat man
Talk about cognitive dissonance!

You seem to claim gun owners are all crude, ill-mannered and impecunious rednecks without a sufficiently developed palate eat where you buss tables.

If your premise is correct, than a boycott of your fine dining space does not have unseemly consumers with guns as regular custom. In other words, they never spent money in your place anyway, so what are you pissing and moaning about customers you insist you never had anyway?

You just scream like a gut shot chipmunk when your paper thin skin and pissant ego are punctured. It sure don't take much, so much for truth in advertising with your tag line!

"People who are easily offended, or who are not accustomed to having their opinions (including deeply personal convictions) challenged may not feel entirely comfortable here. A thick skin is necessary to participate on this or any other discussion forum."

I guess if my livelihood depended on being openly obsequious to a wealthy elite who regard me as part of the "servant" class, I might be a mite testy when off shift too.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. You get fired?
I did not say you owned a restaurant, I said you worked at one.

Perhaps I was in error in relying on your earlier statements intimating your employment at a high-end dining establishment as bearing some semblance to reality. (like there is a Michelin 3 star restaurant in Cleveland)

So concerning your claims, which of the following did you not say?

"My employer does not permit firearms. Why should employers of cooks and waiters have to put up with the threat of menacing or a shooting if they don't want to?"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=417619&mesg_id=417619

"Bring a gun into here and you get fired or a trip to the police station. My employer is proactive about preventing workplace violence."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=printer_friendly&forum=118&topic_id=417619&mesg_id=417672

I'll admit to paraphrasing you a little. Instead of "crude, ill-mannered and impecunious rednecks" you really called gun owners "Mean, vengeful psychopaths with a dangerous attitude...eom" for having the temerity to not patronize restaurants whose policies they found disagreeable.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=417619&mesg_id=417634

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. RW gun-industry activists are "Mean, vengeful psychopaths with a dangerous attitude"
get it right
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Well, I don't think there are many RW anything around this forum.
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 09:50 AM by eqfan592
So I guess we don't have anything to worry about.

And for the record, your post that was linked didn't actually make any such distinction. But hey, nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starboard Tack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #26
47. How can you boycott a place that doesn't want you anyway?
Sounds like a win-win situation
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Beats me.
Ask the guy who was whining that his workplace was going to be boycotted by gunowners if they put up a "No guns" sign.

The guy makes quite plain his aversion to guns and his disgust with those who own them.



I suppose he wants those "Mean, vengeful psychopaths with a dangerous attitude...eom" to stay home but mail in his tips.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. On account of hygiene? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. BUSTED- Turns out, your ire about boycotts is rather selective, as you promoted one here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. When it was pointed out to him
that others had organized boycotts:

"You mean these guys?"

http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/1219/

His response indicates that of course THAT is entirely different and NOT the same thing at all!

"Trying to be cute, I see."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=417619&mesg_id=417661
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveW Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. There were few gun laws in Britain before the 20th Century...
Then the laws came down, but not because of a crime wave. More like the government's fear of rising labor unrest and radical activism. We'll not have that rabble armed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-02-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Don't forget the Irish
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Meanwhile, a group of UK doctors is trying to limit kitchen knives to two inches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What is the point of lying in your subject line?
The article says no such thing.
Read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Google is your friend.
http://www.onmedica.com/newsArticle.aspx?id=ff721cc5-e4d9-4c7a-8f4d-581400379f98

"Dr. Hern and her colleagues at West Middlesex University Hospital in London personally spoke with British chefs and people in the catering business. They responded that "there is no need for people to have such long pointed knifes in their kitchen," Dr. Hern said. "All that is needed is a 2-inch long knife with a pointed blade. Otherwise everything can be done with a blunt-ended knife."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. "No reason.... to be publicly available at all"
Wow, their Prohibitionists sound just like OUR Prohibitionists.

And they have political physicians over there just like here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. From the article:
The researchers said there was no reason for long pointed knives to be publicly available at all.

They consulted 10 top chefs from around the UK, and found such knives have little practical value in the kitchen.

None of the chefs felt such knives were essential, since the point of a<[b> short blade was just as useful when a sharp end was needed.

The researchers said a short pointed knife may cause a substantial superficial wound if used in an assault - but is unlikely to penetrate to inner organs.


They are wanting a short knife that won't reach inside the body. I will grant that I was remembering the "two inches" from a different article. However, this article is clear that they want a short knife that can't reach far inside to vital organs. The intent is the same - to disarm the resident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Straw Man Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. How do you read it?
That the intent is to cut down on the appalling rise in kitchen-knife accidents? What a ludicrous misapprehension.

Do you live in Britain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. There was a DU thread on the issue of kitchen knives in the UK:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5868542

The thread describes a safety knife that can't be used for stabbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. Remember, empirical evidence that conflicts with faith will be denied or ignored:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
54. The UK is a fascist authoritarian heaven
Ban everything! Ban paper, you can cut someone with paper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveW Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
56. Well, make the shank .010 inch wider, but place the guard well back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Poker & knife combination.
Called a bayonet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. If I move to Great Britain, I will get me an assault knife for home defense ...
Maybe something like this Bark River STS-8

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I would prefer a Cold Steel brand Natchez Bowie.
I also like having a crossguard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Looks like a good choice. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Blown330 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I prefer more tactical orientated knives.
Ka-Bar's Becker Combat Bowie



Fullsize D2 model



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. The answer is still 42
V42


You can stuff all of these and more "down the front of your pants" now if you are a citizen of Hew Hampshire .
They have finally come to the conclusion that a weapon is a weapon , and I would have to agree .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Florida issues a concealed weapons permit ...
so if you have one, you can carry a large knife concealed if you want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. If you're fighting in the trenches, get a trench knife



That looks extremely effective. *winces*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Actually I think a cutlass would work great ...
And I already have one.



Cold Steel 1917 Cutlass

In 1917, the U.S. Navy decided to replace its Model 1860 cutlass which had been in continuous service for 57 years, with a new model. Cold Steel’s® modern recreation of this classic fighting sword is as authentic as possible, it is virtually an exact copy of an original in the personal collection of Cold Steel President, Lynn C. Thompson. Our 1917 Cutlass features the signature 25" curved blade and a half basket guard that’s stamped out of heavy 18-guage high carbon steel, and both the blade and guard are blued to resist rusting. The handle is made from carefully shaped hardwood, painted brown and secured to the tang by three heavy brass cutler’s rivets.

The scabbard is an accurate reproduction of the original and is made of high quality leather and features brass and copper fixtures. It can be worn comfortably at the side on a pistol belt without chafing its owner.
http://www.coldsteel.com/1917cutlass2.html



Model 1917 Naval Cutlass
Regulation




The regulation cutlass (above) - a short saber with a cut and thrust blade and a large hand guard - "was issued to enlisted men as a sidearm and maintained in ships armories until the beginning of WWII. The weapons was officially declared obsolete in 1949. The Cutlass was considered an organizational issue item, but was never considered to be a part of the enlisted uniform."
On the regulation patterns, all metal furniture is "blued" similar to firearms; blade is slightly curved and single-edged with a 'clipped' point. The grips are of cross-hatch patterned wood, held in place by three copper rivets, all painted black.

***snip***

Cold Steel is now producing a high quality functional replica of the US M1917 Navy Cutlass. It is extremely well made - and very functional - perhaps better than the original; however, the hilt cup is more similar to the Dutch variant.
http://arms2armor.com/Swords/1917var1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
35.  I would prefer a Ghurka Khukri. Slice and dice with a point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Have you watched the Cold Steel video on their Gurkha Kukri ...
when they compare the damage a .357 magnum and a Gurkha Kukri can do to a block of meat?

It's at http://www.coldsteel.com/gurkhakukri.html

It's definitely one very nasty blade.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
39.  I have been looking at a Cold Steel Kukri for a while.
But mine is only 80yrs old and still holda a wicked sharp edge. From Nepal, hand forged with water buffalo horn grip.

Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
48. Now you have made me want one. Only about $160 on Amazon. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. It is a very impressive weapon ...
I have a small collection of knives and swords and I the Cold Steel 1917 Cutlass would be a good addition.

I was impressed when it arrived. It's very well made and sharp and I got it from Amazon.com. It is merely a wall hanger but while I could display much cheaper weapons, I prefer functional swords.

It definitely would be a deadly weapon at close quarters as shown by this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-QpzW35f1I

If I buy another sword I'll probably look for a replica of the Roman Gladius.


http://www.sword-buyers-guide.com/roman-gladius.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good enough for the Brits good enough for US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It's not good enough for either.
It is unacceptable that their idea of self-defense is to force victims to engage in a physical contest of strength with their assailant.

They actually suggested that an "old lady" should take on an 18-year-old assailant with a knife.

Yeah, that's going to turn out real well for the victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You wouldn't want the innocent to have an unfair advantage or be equal. That's mean
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillerich & Bradsby marketing opportunity?
Maybe the Louisville Slugger folks have an opening here? Cricket bats are made out of fairly soft willow for the most part IIRC. A good ash or hickory turned and fire hardened bat could be created with a Prince Harry autograph model for home defence.

Probably better than a poker or steak knife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. There might be a racket there....
Hillerich and Bradsby has a great museum.



Everyone receives a miniature souvenir bat at the end of the tour!

The amnesty box at Standiford Field, the Louisville airport, is a huge Plexiglas case and it is filled with hundreds upon hundreds of those very same souvenir bats. I wonder if it part of a TSA recycling program?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Could have the whole royal family autograph series - collect them all
The Prince Charles model is basically useless, the Camilla is just an old fugly bat etc.

I've driven past a few times and always wanted to go on the tour. It really is one of those unique American icons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. How generous of them
I suppose, of course, that if my knife is longer than X it's considered an "assault knife".

Does my knife have to reside in a childproof container, inspected randomly by the police? Does it have to be painted blaze-orange with reflective white stripe? How about a serial number? Registration?

Can my knife have a point and a sharp edge, too? That would be really generous of them to allow one or both of those. But my knife might not be allowed to have those things... only "reasonable" force, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DWC Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
37. You can thank a bunch of well armed Colonials
about 237 years ago for the fact that we don't have to put up with that BS here in the USA. Armed defense has kept this country and its individual citizens safe ever since. "From my cold dead hands" is the anthem of a free people.

Semper Fi,
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Coincidentally, India is coming around to our way of thinking:
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 09:53 PM by friendly_iconoclast
INDIA: High Court (Madras) Rules Individual Citizens Cannot Be Denied Guns.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x432795


At the moment, I'm rocking one of these. A steel handle, so it will not break:




A melee weapon for the 21st Century- and yes, I *do* practice carefully in a friend's backyard.

Also handy for splitting kindling and trimming branches, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC