Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plaxico Burress talks to kids about perils of guns .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:52 PM
Original message
Plaxico Burress talks to kids about perils of guns .
As Plaxico Burress grabbed a microphone and started telling his story Thursday afternoon to about 100 children, some of the kids were murmuring and chattering among themselves.

And then he said "gun."

The kids got quiet in a hurry.

-----

"I carried a loaded gun into a nightclub and the gun accidentally discharged and I ended up shooting myself, my own self, in the leg," Burress told the kids, part of the Urban League of Broward County. "I was playing professional football at the time. I had just won a Super Bowl. I had just received a brand-new contract. I had just signed a shoe deal with Nike. The choice that I made, basically it took everything away that I worked so hard for."

http://online.wsj.com/article/APf259737ce3b840b1947f52b43336a879.html

Good for him. Keep it up.
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as it's just him, it's a worthy effort
If Brady Campaign operatives try to sneak into the classroom behind Burress, we may have a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1 agree
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 06:02 PM by RamboLiberal
If Brady comes in then they need to invite NRA Eddie Eagle as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's fine as long as he stays honest about it
And gives due emphasis to the phrases "I ended up shooting myself in the leg" and "the choice that I made."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, that's one fucking idiotic lunatic's point of view.
And it has about as much "interesting" about it as the people who insist that no planes hit the World Trade Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You mean that was not a mirage I saw on TV?
Those really were planes?:silly: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's one of the most pathetic attempts at satire I've ever seen
Not even slightly humorous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Let's not pretend it's representative of the opinion of all pro-RKBA persons, though
Frankly, even if it weren't on Alex Jones' Infowars site--hare-brained conspiracy theory central--the author would have started to lose the moment he referred to prisons as "concentration camps" and completely lost me by the time he used the term "NWO." The only way he could have undermined himself ever further was if he'd thrown in a reference to the "ZOG."

The argument itself is, of course, horseshit as well. The provision that every able-bodied freeman is subject to being called to serve in the militia, and must provide his own weapon and equipment, is from the Militia Act of 1792; it's not in the Constitution. Moreover, neither the Constitution nor the Militia Act require such an individual to go about armed at all times.

Given that the rest of the argument is based on a false premise, I don't need to dignify it any further by pointing out the specifics of how it's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC