at all times. And why not pistols in their pants? Why only in their homes? Are 17-year-olds not vulnerable to attack on the street, in the schoolyard, at church ...? What about 12-year-olds, aren't they?
Didn't the children have a "duty to retreat"?Did anyone ever have a "duty to retreat" in circumstances where leaving the scene would not reasonably foreseeably enabled them to avoid injury or death?
Were these people in danger of injury or death? Could they not have left the home to avoid it? I don't know. Do you?
What was the question again?
Why wasn't that cop's shotgun secured where the 17-year-old child couldn't get to it?That's an excellent question. A better one, though, is:
How old were the other kids, and if that cop's shotgun wasn't secured where they couldn't get to it, why wasn't it?
What question would you be asking if the 17-year-old had used the shotgun to hold up a convenience store and kill the owner?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Lake_massacreAt noon, Weise retrieved a .22 caliber pistol from his bedroom, and fatally shot his paternal grandfather, Daryl Lussier, Sr.(a Sergeant with the Red Lake Police Department), two times in the head and ten times in the chest as he was sleeping. It is not known how Weise obtained the pistol, but according to his friends, it is believed he may have possessed it for as long as one year. Weise then stole Lussier's two police-issue weapons, a .40 caliber Glock 23 pistol and a Remington 12 gauge pump-action shotgun. He then fatally shot Michelle Leigh Sigana, Lussier's girlfriend, two times in the head as she was carrying laundry up the stairs.
And we all know what happened next.
I know what questions I asked:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3344729&mesg_id=3345234iverglas
Thu Mar-24-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. gun lust
The eminently preventable death of people -- yes, people who don't particularly matter -- by firearm is not something that the NRA and its Republican puppets and the media who dance to their tune want to talk about.
What would be the focus of a media circus about Red Lake? It doesn't seem to have the more universally-appealing elements of lumpen teen angst that Columbine had; there were very personal factors at the root of the Red Lake incident it appears. So: "Let's have laws requiring people who own firearms to KEEP THEM THE HELL AWAY FROM CHILDREN?" I don't think so.
A 16-yr-old with access to firearms murdered a bunch of people.
A 17-yr-old with access to a firearm waved it at an unarmed druggie burglar who ran away.
In which case would the outcome almost certainly have been different absent firearms?
I wonder ...