Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's time to crack down on those dangerous arms dealers and (potentially) criminal gun owners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
TPaine7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:23 PM
Original message
It's time to crack down on those dangerous arms dealers and (potentially) criminal gun owners
Reporting from Washington— Firearms from the ATF's Operation Fast and Furious weapons trafficking investigation turned up at the scenes of at least 11 violent crimes in the U.S., as well as at a Border Patrol agent's slaying in southern Arizona last year, the Justice Department has acknowledged to Congress.

The department did not provide details about the crimes. But The Times has learned that they occurred in several Arizona cities, including Phoenix, where Fast and Furious was managed, as well as in El Paso, where a total of 42 weapons from the operation were seized at two crime scenes.

The new numbers, which expand the scope of the danger the program posed to U.S. citizens over a 14-month period, are contained in a letter that Justice Department officials turned over to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month.

In the letter, obtained by The Times on Tuesday, Justice Department officials also reported that Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives officials advised them that the agency's acting director, Kenneth E. Melson, "likely became aware" of the operation as early as December 2009, a month after it began.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf-guns-20110817,0,7742514.story


It is vitally important to increase controls on arms dealers--who tried in vain to get the ATF to change course--and law abiding gun owners--who weren't involved at all. The ATF and Justice Department and whoever gave the orders, however, deserve our full support and respect.

After all, if your neighbor committed a serious crime, you would expect to be placed under police surveillance, right? And you wouldn't be surprised if your neighbor was deputized to serve on the surveillance team, would you?
Refresh | +9 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder why the Justice Department does want to release any details about the crimes ...
This ATF FUBAR continues getting bigger and bigger day by day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. To quote James Grady:
"Boy, what is it with you people? You think not getting caught in a lie is the same thing as telling the truth?"

GOFIGURE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am surprised that Obama has not cleaned house in BATF and AG for this
Would give him some moral standing...his non-action is hurting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
biermeister Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. well at least some of them were..........well promoted?
Edited on Wed Aug-17-11 02:58 PM by biermeister
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/16/promotions-of-fast-and-furious-officials-draw-texa/

I'm all for putting criminals in jail, let's start with the ones at the top
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I am not sure it was criminal at first...though it was incredibly stupid
If got criminal it was when they went into cover up mode
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Silence is consent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. like you say in your sig line you are ... I'm curious
Can you expand on that statement?

I could assume or guess or hypothesize a meaning, but I'd prefer not to.

Now, absent an answer, I might, and then take silence as consent ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The post I replied to referred to why the President has not come out
against the F&F program to, at least, get some moral points. My post (which, BTW I stole from one of the virtual post-it-notes across the top of the page) was trying to say that, either actually or by appearance, it seems the President is not going after the people he should in this matter. Additionally, executive branch agencies seem to be doing their best to try and cover this whole thing up and hope it goes away. Again, without the President weighing in (publicly) it looks like he is consenting to the spin.

What do you think of the President's handling of the matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't have any opinion
Edited on Thu Aug-18-11 09:28 AM by iverglas
There are things on which I don't have opinions, either because I don't have the information I need (either because it isn't available or because I have not sought it out) or because I don't particularly care (which might be a reason I haven't sought out information).

I'm often unwilling to lay heavy blame for bungling. Was a hospital bombed on purpose, out of gross negligence, or by someone's stupid mistake? Did US military personnel kill Canadian military personnel on purpose, out of drugged-up negligence, or by someone's stupid mistake? Did the ATF ...? Bungling may deserve opprobrium and stepped-up efforts to avert it, but it isn't always symptomatic of something deeply evil. It can occur even where there are the best and most honourable intentions; the intentions will not excuse the bungling or eliminate responsibility, but an act itself is not proof of evil intentions. And when judging people or their systems, intentions really do matter, since people aren't perfect when it comes to actions.

I don't know what the situation was in this case, and haven't felt like doing a doctoral thesis in the matter. I've simply observed what happens to cross my path. That hasn't been anywhere near enough to form a judgment of anyone involved, including Obama.

I've gathered that there is a raging war going on at this site (and I assume elsewhere) between people who are deeply disappointed with and angry at Obama and are vocal in their criticism and people (who may also be even as disappointed, or who may actually agree everything he has done in all respects) who maintain that assailing a Democratic president is not a smart thing to do. I don't know what I would do if I were a voter in the US. I did assess the current president, back during the primaries, as ... well, a year later, I said it here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=190&topic_id=30072&mesg_id=30089
Here we are, some time earlier, i.e. before the 2008 election:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3381031&mesg_id=3381696
I said I'd vote for him once he was nominated, if I had to choose, despite my assessment.

And yes, my assessment did include that he pandered and exhibited no firm convictions or clear policies or any reason to believe he had any. I would kinda suspect that may be a contributory factor in the situation under discussion here.


Oh, but what I meant to say ... in this forum, I don't always find that the criticism is coming from the direction I'm standing at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some talk that the CIA was involved...
The narrative of some RW sources is that the Zetas gang was poised to enter a power-sharing agreement with the Mexican government. What to do? Gun-run to the Zetas' competition. As yet unconfirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. With the history of the CIA, it wouldn't surprise me. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Expecting the CIA of having made a mistake?
How could you sir? No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. With apologies to Mr. Duffy:
Always shall innocent blood be shed, and the guilt of the wicked shall flow like a river. The Three (ATF, FBI, CIA) shall spread their blackened wings and be the vengeful striking hammer of DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. you seem to keep missing my gift to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent post....keep hope alive
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC