Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concealed Carry Mania

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
mikeb302000 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 03:01 AM
Original message
Concealed Carry Mania
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/12/bloomberg1376-LQPJSC1A74E901-3VPMER2H27E5SJFBK6CECG0O75.DTL">SFGate published a wonderful article in their Business section about concealed carry laws.

I've never touched a handgun and I haven't been to Florida in decades, yet this month Florida officials mailed me a permit to carry a concealed gun.

If Congress adopts a bill that the National Rifle Association is pushing, Florida's licenses would apply to 49 states in all -- allowing their holders to carry hidden guns in places such as midtown Manhattan, where the New York Police Department rejects most such applications for "concealed- carry" permits.


Part of the discussion centers on states' rights vs. the federal government. In their usual flip-flopping way, the gun-rights folks are all for the federal government http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2009/07/concealed-carry-reciprosity.html">when it favors their agenda. In this case federal law would supersede state law in determining who can carry a concealed carry weapon.

Added to that is the obvious abuse of the system which allows people like the author of the article to apply for out-of-state licenses. http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2010/09/utah-concealed-carry-permits.html">Utah and Florida are the meccas for this kind of legal circumvention of the law.

New York State is an extreme example, but many states have training and testing requirements before issuing licenses. Gun owners with out-of-states permits like those issued from Florida and Utah, are required to do nothing at all.

What's your opinion? Is this right? Wouldn't national reciprocity punish the states with stricter standards? Doesn't allowing out-of-state licenses already do that?

Please leave a comment, tell us what you think?
http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/">(cross posted at Mikeb302000)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think there should be reciprocity wth a national standard.
something like 12 hours of instruction, 4 hours of range time, and a background check would be a good basis. States can keep their in state carry laws (VT, AK, AZ, WY... and other less strict states) but if that citizens wants US reciprocity they'll also have to apply for interstate license.

For example, numerous states grant restricted driving licenses cocsistent with their laws - however those laws may be much more lenient than oter states. For example, a number of states don't allow ANYONE under 16 to operate a car... and other states issue restricted licenses to children as young as 12 years old. All that happens is that those restricted permits only become valid in thier home states.

I think concealed carry could operate in the same fashion.
If states choose, they can issue in-state permits (in addition to the national permits) which have lower prerequisites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Perdiction: The bill will pass, Obama will veto it.
And he will get beat over the head with it in the election.

Over 50% of the House has an "A" rating with the NRA. It will pass the House.

It got 59 votes in the Senate last year when it was a rider to another bill. It needed 60 to get past a Democratic filibuster. After the 2010 election the votes will be there for it to pass.

I hope I am wrong about Obama vetoing it.

If the bill passes it will effectively turn "May-issue" states into "Shall-issue" as their citizens who can't get local permits get UT or FL ones. UT & FL will make some out-of-state money from the fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DanTex Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah those pesky Dems keep getting in the way of the right-wing agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The bill has bipartisan support.
Only some Democrats oppose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DanTex Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, in the same sense that the Iraq War was an international coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. There are a fair amount of Democratic co sponsors
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Except that dem support for such bills far outlived the "coalition"
or Dem support for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. That may be the intent.
The repukes will use it as a stick in the battle ground state against us
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Yes, indeed. The GOP (and, yes, the NRA) are experienced at setting traps like this...
...and the Democrats (along with Obama) are experienced in stepping into it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. More like their heads....
or dicks.

Since there hasn't been a gratuitous pecker slur recently.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. "pecker slut?" Yes, I was called a "redneck" recently...
and I objected: "Can't you tell a Cracker from a redneck?";-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
We_Have_A_Problem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. More like...
Some pesky individuals who don't give a damn about their constituent's rights and freedoms, the laws of our nation, or really anything but their own silly prejudices, keep getting in the way of doing what is right.

Support for national CCW reciprocity is bipartisan.

Now, would you like to try another baseless claim, or are you going to accept that your ignorance has led you to make a few truly stupid statements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. The bill picked up another co-sponsor yesterday, total 243. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, and by the way... Florida and Utah DO have CHL requirements
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 07:07 AM by OneTenthofOnePercent
As usual you have glaring mistakes. For someone so obsessed with writing about guns, you ought to try and educate yourself. The states where citizans may freely carry concealed are AK VT WY & AZ. FL and UT are very popular because most other states have reciprocal agreements whith them and they will grant out-of-state permits to nonresidents... not because of minimal prerequisites for obtaining the permits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gravity556 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. It would be nice, however,
if all the states went to constitutional carry like AZ and the other free states. Requiring a permit to exercise a right is idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mikeb302000 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. didn't you read the article I quoted?
The author got the FL licence through the mail for christ's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. point is
Florida is not unique. Nor is Florida's the easiest. They all come in the mail. I am guessing Italy's gun permits are mailed to the individuals too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Canadian CHLs are hand delivered by Canadian Mounties riding atop armoured moose.
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 03:21 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. You condone perjury ?
Someone else found it distasteful long before you found it worthwhile in promoting your agenda.

Bloomberg writer admits to perjury to obtain FL concealed firearms license

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x460916
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. The bubba lied and should be prosecuted for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nice of him to admit in national print that he committed a crime in doing this.
That will make the prosecutors job much easier, with a confession in hand.

The notary is fucked too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. I hope the legislation becomes a ryder/earmark on the JOBS bill.
then Obama can't veto it - lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Worked for one of my co-workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'm in NY. My opinion is: I hope it passes so I can carry anywhere. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is just a natural part of the expansion of firearm rights.
The sweeping liberalism of firearm rights is reaching its zenith, and this is just a bit of the fallout which still needs to be resolved.

It too over 20 years, but we have finally reached the point where every state in the nation allows concealed carry except for Illinois.

Now we are sorting out the problems of all these different states having different standards for carrying concealed weapons. It is going to take some hammering out to make it uniform and effective.

The goal is simple: If you have a concealed carry permit you should be able to go anywhere in the United States carrying a concealed weapon, just as you can drive anywhere in the United States with any state's driver's license.

I think it's logical that you should receive the permit from the state that you reside in. I would not mind national standards for concealed carry, but I don't see what the big deal is. I suspect that if you could see the data, you would see that regardless of what state the permit holders received their permit in, and no matter how much or how little training or testing they had to undergo, you will probably still see that the rate of revocation of permits is miniscule.

Today, states currently make their own standards for driver's licenses, yet driver's licenses are still universally recognized from one state to another, even if one state has more less restrictive requirements.

But the ultimate goal here is clear, and is coming: No state anywhere is going to be able to deprive people from exercising their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and no state is going to be able to prevent the carrying of concealed weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Bloomberg will have a stroke ...
if this law passes. He will no longer be able to limit legal concealed carry in New York city to the rich, the famous and his buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Fuck that elitist pig.
Did I get that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. It's the backlash I tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lawwolf Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Complete BS
Unless they changed the law this entire article is BS. The law in Congress right now (at least its earlier versions) only applied to people who had RESIDENT gun permits. If you lived in California and got a non-resident permit, the new law WOULD NOT require any state to honor that permit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. You are wrong. Read the bill.
Here is a link to the text of the bill: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.822:

Sec. 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms

`(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof, related to the carrying or transportation of firearms, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, and who is carrying a government-issued photographic identification document and a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm, may carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State, other than the State of residence of the person, that--
`(1) has a statute that allows residents of the State to obtain licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms; or
`(2) does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms by residents of the State for lawful purposes.
`(b) A person carrying a concealed handgun under this section shall be permitted to carry a handgun subject to the same conditions or limitations that apply to residents of the State who have permits issued by the State or are otherwise lawfully allowed to do so by the State.
`(c) In a State that allows the issuing authority for licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms to impose restrictions on the carrying of firearms by individual holders of such licenses or permits, a firearm shall be carried according to the same terms authorized by an unrestricted license or permit issued to a resident of the State.


Here is a link to an official summary: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h822/show

Official Summary
2/18/2011--Introduced.National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011 - Amends the federal criminal code to authorize a person who is carrying a government-issued photographic identification document and a valid permit to carry a concealed firearm in one state, and who is not prohibited from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm under federal law, to carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) in another state in accordance with the restrictions of that state.


Nothing there about it having to be a resident license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Anybody wanna bet me that the links lead to his blog?
"I've never touched a handgun and I haven't been to Florida in decades, yet this month Florida officials mailed me a permit to carry a concealed gun."

Yeah, ya didn't see fit to mention that later in the article it said how "
Florida, which granted my permit after I viewed a half- hour, online safety video, now says it made a mistake."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/12/bloomberg1376-LQPJSC1A74E901-3VPMER2H27E5SJFBK6CECG0O75.DTL#ixzz1XxUObeXj

He wasn't just someone that had a permit sent to him, he had initiated the process. That ommition is somewhat dishonest in my opinion.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You can tell by hovering your mouse over the links.
If you hover your mouse over the links, you can see where they go before you click on them.

Yes, all of his links but one go back to his blog. Don't click on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mikeb302000 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. take that bet. The link goes to SFGate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DanTex Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ain't nuthin but a Road-Rage Thang...
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 03:45 PM by DanTex
'Road-Rage' Thing

It began as "a road-rage kind of thing," Feldman recalls. He and the other driver pulled to the side of the road, "and the guy gets out of his car and he's carrying a tire iron."

Feldman drew the Smith & Wesson Holding Corp.'s .38 caliber Chief's Special Airweight, a five-shot revolver that was a gift from his girlfriend. He rolled down his car's window and pointed it at the approaching driver.

"'You got a problem, Bud?'" he recalls asking.

"He dropped the tire iron and said 'Sorry, my mistake,' and retreated back to his vehicle," Feldman said. "I'm not sure what would have happened if I hadn't had that gun." Feldman still has the tire iron in his garage.


One of my favorite DGU genres is the classic, gratuitous road-rage DGU. It's right up there with the "I get the remote DGU" and the "you're not breaking up with me DGU". But, really, nothing makes the church of CCW prouder than gratuitously showing the other guy who's boss when you could instead have just driven away.

My only complaint is that "You got a problem, Bud" is just so dull. In my opinion, to score full points, you gotta go with Clint Eastwood: "Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have fucked with? That's me."


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The morally superior person accepts the chance of traumatic brain injury
It's only those crude types with guns that choose the cowards' way out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mikeb302000 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. your question is asanine. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. Lol, love the spin on this one..
from the sfgate article:
Last month, Ohio became one of a handful of states where it's legal to carry a concealed firearm into a bar -- though some allow bar owners to opt out and others forbid the gun owner from drinking or being drunk.
(em. mine.)

'Some'? How about all. No state forces owners to allow concealed carry.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC