Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court hears privacy case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:13 PM
Original message
Supreme Court hears privacy case
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:13 PM by Superfly
I'm not sure if this has been discussed down here yet, but here it is. Landmark case in the Supreme Court on whether or not we will be required to surrender ID at the demand of police.

------------------
link

<snip>

Do you have to tell the police your name? Depending on how the Supreme Court rules, the answer could be the difference between arrest and freedom.

The justices heard arguments Monday in a first-of-its-kind case that asks whether people can be punished for refusing to identify themselves.

The court took up the appeal of a Nevada cattle rancher who was arrested after he told a sheriff’s deputy that he had done nothing wrong and did not have to reveal his name or show identification during an encounter on a rural road four years ago.

<snip>

“I would do it all over again,” Hiibel, dressed in cowboy hat, boots and a bolo tie, said outside the court Monday. “That’s one of our fundamental rights as American citizens, to remain silent.”

<snip>

Edited: Darned HTML tags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSandman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The .gov wins this,
Then the option of digitized thumbprints on Driver's License/Id cards becomes mandatory.

State ID's are a de facto National ID card already, with the sharing of databases among the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansberrym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bad cases make bad law
and this seems like a very bad case (or maybe a good case from the point of view of a government intent on separating us from our rights).

There was some sort of altercation with his teenage daughter just before the stoppage/questioning, so the police had good cause to question him. He is obviously much older than the girl, so it would seem that the police took logical and reasonable steps to insure her safety.


I guess we can hope that the supremes tailor thier ruling narrowly to make it apply only to very similar situations, and not give away too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's got a website that is pretty in-depth...
including the original arrest video. I do not recall the officer telling him that he had any probable suspicion of anything nor did he tell him why he wanted to see the ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC