Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just in: CBS' Sharyl Atkkisson suggests "Fast/Furious" evidence might be withheld...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:45 PM
Original message
Just in: CBS' Sharyl Atkkisson suggests "Fast/Furious" evidence might be withheld...
due to the involvement of personnel in other Federal agencies. On Face the Nation minutes ago:

"Attkinson, who also appeared on 'Face the Nation,' pointed out that one reason evidence might be withheld is if it were 'matched to a confidential informant that was being used by DEA or FBI or another agency.'"


Atkkisson seems convinced that other agencies are indeed involved:


"There are a lot of questions out there because other agencies were involved in this operation," she said.


Darrell Issa (R) claims that Attorney General Holder's "Number Two" man had intimate knowledge of "Fast and Furious" operations:


"His chief of staff had intimate details; we have notes in his handwriting that shows that the number two and Eric Holder's right hand had intimate details for long time," Issa told CBS' Bob Schieffer. "One of the questions is, why wouldn't you tell your boss about a program that had gotten so out-of-control that it had all kinds of people scurrying to try to stop it?"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/10/16/ftn/main20121062.shtml

_____________
NOTE: Sharyl Atkkisson's name is spelled in a variety of ways, even by CBS staff. I have settled on this latter one.
Refresh | +14 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably Defense
Look up Joint Task Force North. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Darrell Issa's pushing this crap hard hoping to take Holder down
thus hurting Obama which is his fantasy. Remember how the Bush administration used reporters to spread their war propaganda? There might be something the government conspired to do here or not, I don't know. I do know Darrell Issa is insanely partisan (to the extreme) and therefore I take all the news about this and what he's involved in accordingly. Some reporters are very ambitious too and can let themselves be used thinking they will get somewhere faster professionally. I'm a skeptic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unfortunately it looks like the Fast & Furious story has some real legs
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 03:39 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
I keep hoping the administration will step in, clean house, and defang this attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The problem with that is not only are there several other sources reporting on this:
The LA Times, McClatchy Newspapers, etc.- but that memos from Holder's own department have directly contradicted his sworn
testimony to Congress.

So while Issa is undoubtedly pushing hard on this, Holder himself gave Issa the means to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. exactly
Unfortunately the AG has given himself enough rope to hang himself.

Although I hate it that this will hurt Obama, we definitely need to know what happened here--no coverups, please (sheesh)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. So-o-o-o what are CBS's motives? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then there is this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. A lot a bad ideas were implemented under the Bush administration ...
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 08:10 PM by spin
I voted for Obama because I hoped that he would clean up the mess left behind by eight years of incompetence.

Unfortunately, it currently looks like the Obama administration is engaged in a cover up of this scandal. For an administration that promised to be transparent, this is very disappointing.

This is NOT what I hoped for!

I honestly felt that Obama would deliver on his promise of change that I could believe in.

I just looked through a list of promises that Obama made prior to the election and I noticed this one in particular.


Obama said he would:

• Uphold the Second Amendment but also keep "AK-47s out of the hands of criminals."

http://articles.cnn.com/2008-08-29/politics/obama.promises_1_fuel-efficient-cars-health-care-tax-code/2?_s=PM:POLITICS


Obama has lived up to his promise to uphold the Second Amendment and in fact has approved laws such as allowing legal concealed carry in national parks.


Parks open to holders of concealed guns
Monday, February 22, 2010

U.S. national parks will open Monday to holders of concealed firearms as a hard-fought law passed last year takes effect, but both sides expect more battles over exactly what the legislation means in practice.

The law - probably the biggest legislative achievement for conservatives in what was otherwise a year dominated by President Obama’s agenda - says national parks will be governed by the same rules as the states in which they are located. That means about 370 of the country’s 392 National Park Service properties will permit visitors to carry firearms.

Advocates of gun control were dismayed that House Democrats accepted the language and that Mr. Obama signed the bill. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gave Mr. Obama an “F” for his first year in office.

“In just one year, Barack Obama has signed into law more repeals of federal gun policies than in President George W. Bush’s eight years in office,” the Brady Center said in its one-year report, which also noted rules that restored Amtrak passengers’ ability to carry firearms in checked luggage.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/national-parks-will-open-gates-to-holders-of-conce/?page=all


Unfortunately the Fast and Furious scandal shows that agencies of our government were allowing lethal weapons to end up in the hands of criminals.

I don't feel that Obama was personally aware of this program. However, the man I voted for would find this program unacceptable and would take full responsibility for finding out how this ever happened. He would never approve of a cover up. Perhaps he will decide to step in, take charge and if the allegations are indeed true, he will take steps to insure that this never happens again.

I can always hope.


edited for typo




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree with your position to the the "drug war...."
Previous "gunwalker"-type shenanigans by Bush have been reported here, and commented on at length. What is unfortunate, however, is if Holder and the White House try to keep the lid on this, then when it finally breaks, BushCo's role will pale in significance; he's out of office, it was about the W.O.D. anyhow, etc. If Obama, Holder air this out now, they can use Bush's involvement with some effect; that would be the political thing to do.

Unfortunately, if the scope of Gunwalker turns out to be far more extensive than merely arms tracing over the border -- "favoring" La Sinaloa over the Zetas, guns-for-drugs with a gang(s), a campaign to push for gun-control yet again -- then the White House has ample reason politically to stall or stonewall the investigation.

It is disturbing that other agencies may be involved, as Atkkisson reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And ABC is all over it
Just like they have been .... right from the very beginning .




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. "or another agency"
"Attkinson, who also appeared on 'Face the Nation,' pointed out that one reason evidence might be withheld is if it were 'matched to a confidential informant that was being used by DEA or FBI or another agency.'"

I.E. the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC