because it presents the opportunity for both "parties" to step back from yet another "guns/drugs/hostages" investigation which might result in more political volatility. I recall the "contras-drugs" deal cut by the feds and L.A. drug dealers, widely credited for spreading the "crack epidemic."
"In 1996 Gary Webb wrote a series of articles published in the San Jose Mercury News, which investigated Nicaraguans linked to the CIA-backed Contras who had smuggled cocaine into the U.S. which was then distributed as crack cocaine into Los Angeles and funneled profits to the Contras. The CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of drugs into the U.S. by the Contra personnel and directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras.
In 1996 CIA Director John M. Deutch went to Los Angeles to attempt to refute the allegations raised by the Gary Webb articles, and was famously confronted by former Los Angeles Police Department officer Michael Ruppert, who testified that he had witnessed it occurring.<8>"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_traffickingThis was shut down immediately by MSM when the L.A. Times, WaPo and the N.Y. Times ran simultaneous same-day editorials condemning the stories written by reporter Gary Webb (Pulitzer winner, IIRC). Webb later "died" from a "suicide."
Given the margins you report, it seems there is nothing to impede an investigation into this multi-agency gun-trafficking scheme. MSM is severely weakened in terms of influence since the days of Webb and crack cocaine, and at least some of the main players of the media are still pursuing the matter.