Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Gun Magnet: Montana Awash in Far-Right Extremists, Thanks to Loose Laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:44 AM
Original message
The Gun Magnet: Montana Awash in Far-Right Extremists, Thanks to Loose Laws
A number of state legislatures in the Interior West in recent years, reflecting their deeply conservative constituencies, have tried to outdo each other in promoting gun rights within their boundaries -- almost always at the behest of far-right gun factions. Leading the way, probably, has been Montana, whose legislature has passed a number of radical bills in recent years aimed at limiting federal oversight of guns in the state, including a recent bill giving sheriffs the right to arrest federal agents.

Now Montanans are learning there is a steep price to pay for endorsing gun-rights extremism: Not only does it empower some of the most extreme right-wingers operating in the realm of mainstream politics, it also attracts some of the most radical members of the far right, including committed racists who see their new Western homes as the place to try to build a white-supremacist homeland.

David Holthouse has a four-part series at Media Matters reporting on this phenomenon in detail, and it is a must-read:

In addition to calling on fellow right-wing extremists to move to the Flathead Valley, leaders of both the PLE and the Patriot movements in the region are urging followers to exploit Montana's weak firearms regulations by stocking up on guns, including .50 caliber sniper rifles and assault weapons, says Travis McAdam, executive director of the Montana Human Rights Network, which closely follows PLE and Patriot activity, including online communications.

"With the PLE, it's the coming battle with Zionist Occupied Government, with the Patriots, it's the New World Order, but again the rhetoric is similar: 'A big fight is coming, so move with us to Montana where it's easy to get a lot of serious guns, because chances are you're going to need them,'" says McAdam.

http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/gun-magnet-montana-awash-far-right-e

This is what the GOPNRA wants, from coast to coast.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I m pro-gun but the NRA is a bunch of right wing nuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Philosopher King Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is incredibly simple-minded to blame it on freedom, when no other explanation can be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's right! When there's only one explanation for something.....
we should disbelieve it. "sarcasm"

I sure hope you just forgot your "sarcasm"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. Funny, I thought Montana was awash in Hollywood people.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Brady bunch ranks them with Vermont and New Hampshire
if guns are the issue, why doesn't Vermont and New Hampshire have similar issues? Perhaps other issues like geographic isolation and low population density are the reason why Montana is so attractive to such groups? Because there are many states with similar gun laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can sheriffs arrest federal agents in VT and NH? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The law actually says that federal agents must get local approval
from the sheriff before they can arrest, search or seize. It is not specific to gun laws - there is a long running tension between state and federal power in the western United States.

But to answer your question, if federal agents break the law, of course they can be arrested by local law enforcement in NH or VT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Did they commit crimes?
Your working from an over-simple model, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. I would imagine a sheriff anywhere can arrest a federal agent
depending on the reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DanTex Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Actually it's not the "Brady bunch" making this point...
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 11:35 AM by DanTex
It comes straight from the gun-loving neo-Nazi white supremacists. For example:
(Pioneer Little Europe spokesperson) Gaede has repeatedly pointed to Montana's pro-gun culture and loose firearms regulations as one of the fundamental reasons for launching the PLE movement in the Flathead Valley. "You're not going to have any trouble building up a self-defense arsenal around here," she recently informed potential recruits.

Yes, of course, a "self-defense arsenal". What kind of freedom-loving American doesn't understand the need to build up a self-defense arsenal?

Oh, and if you don't know what the Pioneer Little Europe movement is, you should drop by a couple Montana gun shows. Just look for the friendly "gun rights" enthusiasts with the neo-Nazi insignia. Apparently the Mexican drug cartels and Al-Qaeda terrorists aren't the only people taking advantage of lax gun laws like the gun show loophole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So the problem here is hate groups?
so lets pass some legislation regulating such groups - don't see what the problem is.

Are these groups actually linked to an increase in gun violence or are you simply using an unpopular group to attack gun rights in general?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Don't see what the problem is.
so lets pass some legislation regulating such groups - don't see what the problem is.

You will when some winger decides moveon.org is a hate group
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You are right - I actually prefer the status quo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaFTW2012 Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. That's all it is
A smear. The lame "guilt by association" technique, in this case "gun owner/advocate = racist skinhead/drug dealer/terrorist".

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Speaking of absolute fucking MOONBATS
April Gaede? did you know that her neighbors actually protested against her being allowed to move to Kalispell?

BTW can you explain this "gun show loophole" to us? does it somehow mean that a FFL no longer has to conduct a NICS background check regardless of the venue in which he conducts business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. and --
*crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ObamaFTW2012 Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. The what?
WTF is a "gun show loophole"? Are you talking about the federal law that requires firearm dealers to demand a completed Form 4473 from potential buyers, along with a NICS background check, but does not require such from private party transactions anywhere? Gun shows aren't magical fairy tale lands for gun nuts where laws are suspended while groups of uniformed and plain-clothes agents and officers of various state, federal, county, and municipal law enforcement agencies prowl the crowd looking for known felons and illegal weapons transactions.

Jesus, dude, get a grip. I hate skinheads, drug dealers, and Al Qaeda too, but you seem to be trying to paint a mental picture of some free-for-all arms bazaar populated by nothing but those types of people. In reality, gun shows are mostly old white people, the occasional black guy (like me), and a few asians and hispanics (sometimes friends of mine). The shadiest guy at the gun show is probably the beef jerky guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Don't forget the Sham-WOW dude NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaFTW2012 Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah
that guy exudes shadiness. He should be selling car stereo equipment on Canal Street in Manhattan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
47. The Party of the Governor? Presidential winner last time? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
52. I bet they feel left out.
Edited on Thu Dec-01-11 02:27 PM by beevul
"Just look for the friendly "gun rights" enthusiasts with the neo-Nazi insignia. Apparently the Mexican drug cartels and Al-Qaeda terrorists aren't the only people taking advantage of lax gun laws like the gun show loophole."

PLE : "How come ATF never let any guns walk to us? We are sad panda"...

"people taking advantage of lax gun laws like the gun show loophole."

It seems you have a fundamental misunderstanding of reality, Sir.

There is NO gun show loophole. Its a "private sale loophole", but the reality is that it isn't even a loophole, seeing as the federal government has no authority to regulate intrastate commerce - thats private sales of firearms in case you weren't aware - and that lack of authority exists just as much at a gun show as it does at a flea market or yard sale or classified ad.

Now that you're informed, can we expect that you'll stop using the term "gun show loophole", since it is misleading, inaccurate, and incorrect?

Or do we just get to link this post whenever you use it hereafter, and point out that you're being deliberately misleading?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. And the low population densities and isolation have nothing to do with it?
Silly me, I thought the Western states attracted the neo-NAZI types because it takes the sheriff 2 days to drive from one corner of the county to the other...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It takes that long for the Sheriff to get to his neo-Nazi meeting? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. woah, now
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pointless flamebait and an ill-conceived attempt at a smear.
Unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. There are white supremest groups here in Montana. Some of them isolate themselves, which is easy to
do in Montana. My university has a class that takes field trips to their compounds. The professor that teaches the class is a really cool guy. He told me there are very few women at these compounds, and the women students who participate in the field trips sometimes receive love letters from the men because the men lack normal courtship skills. They are always around other guys, so they don't know how to act around women, yet they are extremely lonely.

Their hate is a prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Slightly off topic buy
Anyone's hate is a prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I agree, and will add, some hate is more alienating than other hate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. The more multi-thousand-dollar guns they buy...
...the less money they have to give to their church or to Republican politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaFTW2012 Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. 2 corrections
There is no such thing as an "assault weapon", except for in the minds of a few die-hard gun haters like Mike Bloomberg, Dianne Feinstein, and their loyal minions. I call mine "homeland defense rifles". It sounds more patriotic, though admittedly a tad nationalistic.

A "sniper rifle" is ANY rifle in the hands of a sniper. A sniper is a trained marksman capable of making highly accurate shots, often at long ranges, far beyond the skills of the majority of marksmen. Therefore, a ".50 caliber sniper rifle" exists only in the hands of a sniper. Otherwise, it's just a .50 rifle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Right-wing extremists have been gravitating toward the interior west since the 1970s and 80s.

The rhetoric of Bush I New World Order riled them up as much as anything else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. looks like a very interesting read
and I will be reading it. For now, I just wanted to mention how interesting it was to see that when I left a tab open with the list for this board, this thread (which I hadn't read yet) had 8 recommendations ... when I clicked on it just now it had three.

Who among us is so desperate to ensure that information like this doesn't catch the eye of DU members?!?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I am guessing that
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 09:32 PM by gejohnston
many DU readers also read MM and CR, so doesn't really matter. Some might be in Montana reading them while cleaning their guns thinking "no shit"
What states do these nuts usually come from? In the case of the Nazis that moved to Idaho in the 80s, Illinois.
The Scientologists bought a ranch in my home county to archive L Ron's writings. They picked it because it is arid, sparsely populated (37K people in the same land area slightly smaller than the state of Mass.) Yet, the county still found them looking for their building permit. Does that make my relatives Scientoligists or militia nuts? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. I unrecced it for the bullshit correlation it tries to draw.
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 10:06 PM by AtheistCrusader
Also, the article itself contains no census type data on the alleged migration of these shitheads into Montana.

Not really sure what the spear hunting hullaballoo was all about. There are people in this very subfolder that think we should be hunting deer with nothing more advanced than sticks. WTF.

Cold Steel makes a Boar Spear for a reason. People do use them to hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. Some people would say that the vile bigotry and unsupported claims of the "article"...
should be reason to censor it and vile filth like it.

Some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Simo 1939_1940 Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
32. As others have stated - unrec for blatant smear job. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm very familiar with the Flathead Valley in western Montana.
Believe me, there are enough Native Americans up there to put a stop to any serious white-supremacist foolishness.

North Idaho had a bad reputation clear up until just over a decade ago when the Aryan Nations was finally sued into obsolescence. Truth is, besides the few outspoken kooks, most people -- even most white people -- don't put up with any serious racist bullshit. Their message falls on deaf ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yep.
I'm sure Libby and Troy have their share of white supremacists, as they always have, but that shit is deep underground. You never see it. You never hear it. It's not welcome there. No one tolerates it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. David Neiwert
This is the same guy that scribbled the "Al Qaida says you can buy unregulated machine guns at gun shows, and I believe them" article. Then quoted a gun control advocate, not a police armor or ATF firearms expert, but an unnamed GCA on how easy it is to convert a semi auto to a full auto. In other words, he couldn't hack it at a high school newspaper. Now he is back with this shit. What was even worse, was that he copy and pasted other peoples' stuff, or they plagiarized his because they read the same. That was only last spring.

A number of state legislatures in the Interior West in recent years, reflecting their deeply conservative constituencies, have tried to outdo each other in promoting gun rights within their boundaries -- almost always at the behest of far-right gun factions.

For example, what laws is he talking about? Other than liberalizing concealed carry laws like everyone else, what is he talking about? Other than maybe this:
http://helenair.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/new-gun-law-aimed-at-asserting-sovereignty/article_f4de1503-def8-52ee-b007-f66db259e8e0.html
But those guns (if they exist) can never leave the state. Oh yeah, signed by the same guy who wants to set up a single payer system in Montana.

including a recent bill giving sheriffs the right to arrest federal agents.

So, where can I find more on this? So far, it looks like it was introduced but went nowhere. Outside of the OP, I only see places like World Nut Daily and various black helicopter spotter type sites.

This post is written as part of the Media Matters Gun Facts fellowship. The purpose of the fellowship is to further Media Matters' mission to comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. Some of the worst misinformation occurs around the issue of guns, gun violence, and extremism; the fellowship program is designed to fight this misinformation with facts.

In other words, this is part of the $400K the Joyce Foundation gave MM to write disinformation. It is at the bottom of Neiwert's article. IMHO, the most dishonest and hypocritical thing I have seen.

Here are some of the comments from Neiwert's post. Who can spot the bigotry here?
Fuck Montana. If we had any kind of real democracy, these fascist, racist asshats would be nothing but the side-show that their inbred lifestyles make them out to be...


f your typical Montanan is anything like your average southern redneck, they afford their guns by letting their wives and children go without decent food, clothing, healthcare, education, Hey, these guys know what's really important. Personally, I say let 'em have all the guns they want. Maybe they'll get into a good ol fashioned Hatfields and McCoys type war and shoot each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. "Montana Awash in Far-Right Extremists, Thanks to Loose Laws"
I didn't know we needed more laws against "extremists". How would such a law be crafted? What are your specific objections and objectives?

After that, your train left the tracks, at a high rate of speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
39. 50 cal sniper rifles.....OH MY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. Unrecced from +17 to -0. Far-Right Extremists...
Squirrel!


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #40
41.  Yea, it hurts when your personal, favorite mantra isn't accepted by others. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. That's what you get for trying to smear the great state of Montana.
Your contempt for rural states is duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. 'Got tired of smearing Florida, that other Obama-voting state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. Or maybe because your bigotry is just as vile as theirs....
Just a hypothesis, of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. David Holthouse...where have I heard that name before...
Oh, yeah...

"I bought the gun last April. I had a few firearms in my closet already, but they'd all been purchased legally, in my name, from a licensed firearms dealer. So I flew to Phoenix and went to a gang barrio, where I bought a Beretta 9mm with a homemade silencer and the serial number removed. I took this gun to the local garage gunsmith and had him put dozens of deep nicks and grooves in the Beretta's barrel to corrupt ballistics tests. The gunsmith warned me that this would ruin the gun's accuracy beyond a few feet, but I didn't care. I intended to get up-close and personal."

http://www.westword.com/2004-05-13/news/stalking-the-bogeyman/3/

Granted, this individual went through a terrible ordeal, however...

There is still the issue of possessing a firearm with altered/removed serial number - a federal crime, transportation of said firearm across state lines, possession of a home made - and presumably unregistered silencer/suppressor - a federal crime,and, obvious and admitted criminal intent - all admissions on the part of this individual.

If this person were posting a "pro gun" viewpoint, I do wonder what those not of the "pro-gun" viewpoint would say about it, and about the paragraph I quoted above.


Something about his credibility, I think...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. "Granted, this individual went through a terrible ordeal, however..."
Yeah.

The man I was going to kill was the one who raped me in 1978, when I was seven years old.

... There's a scene in The Good, the Bad, and the Uglywhere the gunfighter played by Eli Wallach righteously blows away a guy and then drops this pearl of murderous wisdom: "If you're going to shoot, shoot. Don't talk."

Because if you let them talk, they may beg, and if they beg, you may not shoot. When I was still planning to kill the man I was now sitting beside on the 16th Street Mall, my plan was to walk up, say, "David Holthouse. You raped me when I was seven," and then pop, one slug to the crotch, let him writhe, kick him over, hold him down with my foot and then pop, pop, pop, three to the back of the head, lights out.

I knew that if I gave him time to talk, I might not pull the trigger -- and sure enough, as soon as I exchanged a few sentences with him, I didn't want to shoot him at all, because I saw him as a frightened, damaged man. He wasn't the Bogeyman anymore. He was real. He begged my forgiveness. He swore I was the only one.

All the experts say he was almost certainly lying. But then, all the experts say it was extremely unusual for him to admit his crime to me, let alone his wife and parents, and he did at least make the admission to his parents. I checked.


We can read a bit about the effect that had on his life. Post-traumatic stress disorder, writ large.

An absolutely classic perfect example of someone who should NEVER have a firearm. Someone whose life has been driven, his thoughts distorted, by fear since he was seven years old.

He's got over his feelings about the immediate source of his fear, but he may never get over what has been a life-long habit of seeing the world as a threatening place.

To offer up a victim of early childhood sexual abuse and his rational responses to that experience (PTSD is not an irrational response - when you have lived through horrific experiences from which you had no protection, it is not irrational to see the world as threatening) as discrediting him when it comes to his opinion about firearms policy ... pretty poor effort.

If this person were posting a "pro gun" viewpoint, I do wonder what those not of the "pro-gun" viewpoint would say about it, and about the paragraph I quoted above.

I would say exactly what I have said, which is exactly what I have said already when people have posted in this forum that they plan to get guns as a response to a life-threatening situation they have experienced, such as an armed robbery: that he is the last person on earth who should have guns, and the poster child for stringent controls on access to guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. did he really do it?
I tend to be skeptical of people who admit (probably falsely) of committing crimes in the open press.

"I bought the gun last April. I had a few firearms in my closet already, but they'd all been purchased legally, in my name, from a licensed firearms dealer. So I flew to Phoenix and went to a gang barrio, where I bought a Beretta 9mm with a homemade silencer and the serial number removed. I took this gun to the local garage gunsmith and had him put dozens of deep nicks and grooves in the Beretta's barrel to corrupt ballistics tests. The gunsmith warned me that this would ruin the gun's accuracy beyond a few feet, but I didn't care. I intended to get up-close and personal."


The only federal gun control law he did not admit to violating was the one signed by Calvin Coolidge and maybe the Brady Act.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. Hmm. What party does the governor belong to? Did the state go to McCain? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
50. What a steaming pile of anti-gun bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC