Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Crossbows, samurai swords to be banned in Victoria

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 01:34 PM
Original message
Crossbows, samurai swords to be banned in Victoria
Crossbows and samurai swords would be banned in Victoria, the State Government announced yesterday.

Police Minister Andre Haermeyer said Victoria was already preparing legislation, but a spokesman said machetes would not be included in the ban because they had a wide range of legitimate uses.

SNIP

"It is about making them generally unavailable to those people who just want to carry them around, either for self-defence or to commit deliberately aggressive acts," he said.



Full story is here:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/02/1056825457398.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh for Pete's sake
A machete is just as effective as a weapon as any Samurai sword.

Who the hell would carry around a genuine Samurai sword worth thousands of dollars, or a fake Samurai sword worth only a hundred bucks yet worthless as a weapon?

How many crossbow murders have there been in Australia's history? This crap reminds me of - here - where the San Diego City Council just banned bowfishing from Ocean Beach Pier. People have been bowfishing there for several decades and there are exactly zero records of injuries from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Peddle it somewhere else SlackMaster
The RKBS nuts don't care how much death they create. And the corrupt sword industry arm in arm with our own bowfishing crowd create a market for this. No doubt the Republican party will do the work for these groups with all of their blood money while listening to Ted Nugent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Cry me a river, Township75
Fishing is murder, and those Samurai swords are war booty from a NUKULUR ATTACK anyway.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Who are you trying to kid?
The RKBS "enthusiasts" hooey leads to more killings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sell it to someone who gives a crap
Or someone who TAKES a crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
556 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You guys.....
got me on the floor crying. Nice job. No question who that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. "corrupt sword industry?!?!?"
That's a little over the top, don't you think?

What has the sword industry done that's corrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Its the Sword Culture that permeates our society
The National Sword Assocation has blocked every piece of common-sense sword control legislation since 1949.

The courts are all packed with sword-huggers, and the NSA has an office in the White House.

The US has more sword violence then all other Western industrialized nations combined.

Swords kill or maim 13 kids every day.

Swords are not regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission or any other federal agency.

Any wacko or terrorist can go to a knife show and buy a sword of any length without a background check or waiting period.

Unlicensed sword dealers are selling military swords, which have no legitimate sporting use.

Permissive sword laws in some states allow anyone to buy a sword and smuggle it into states with sword control. We need strong national sword laws.

The sword lobby says sword laws are not being enforced, but the NSA gutted the Bureau of Razors, Scalpels, and Knives so it has no enforcement capabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. "When Swords Are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Swords"
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slappypan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wuuuuaoh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Swords are better then guns
you don't have to bend over to pickup dog turds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Just Don't Bend Over With a Sword in Your Pocket!!!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Aren't bowie knives and "Rambo" knives already banned?
I be packing muh Barnett to knock the homies that get in muh way!

Have they even fired a crossbow???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Road trip! Western Australia!
Edited on Tue Aug-19-03 07:05 PM by Iluvleiberman
"The Northern Territory is resisting the national ban because the weapons are used for controlling feral animals."


Heh. Heh. or maybe New South Wales? New Guinea? New Zealand? Tasmania?

Not ALL of Australia is banning them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. Ban "razor blades", favorite weapons for suicide and self defense. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is probably fair enough IMHO...
""It is about making them generally unavailable to those people who just want to carry them around, either for self-defence or to commit deliberately aggressive acts," he said. "

They're not banning them, they're making it harder for people to use them as weapons. This probably won't affect the collector or martial artist.

FYI in the UK there have been several occasions where a Samurai sword has been used to kill or injure people in attacks, including the personal assistant of an MP.

I'm actually in Australia at the moment, and as far as I can tell from the news here, what they're doing is trying to stop people who have no genuine reason to own these things from having them. I have no problem with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Who determines what you need?
"I'm actually in Australia at the moment, and as far as I can tell from the news here, what they're doing is trying to stop people who have no genuine reason to own these things from having them. I have no problem with this."

What 'genuine reason' do we have to own anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well.......
Collectors, martial artists, film armourers etc. may have genuine reasons for owning them.

If you happen to be someone with convictions for violent assault, gang membership or who can't actually give a convincing reason for wanting one, then maybe you forego your "right" to own a big sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was in Spain this past May and.....
they had HUGE swords for sale in a shop. Presumably to anyone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And you point is???
Look, I don't have an axe (ha ha ha) to grind about this.

If a government feels that its citizens aren't allowed to own big swords without a reasonable explanation then that's fair enough.

If a government feels that its citizens (or visitors) can buy big swords then fair enough.

If there was a spate of sword killings then I'd probably go for it, if we were in Braveheart times then I'd probably be against it, but as it is I'm not that bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. There arn't a spate of sword killings yet they are effectively banning the
I'm just saying Spain has common sense in sword policy. Australia does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. There have been several sword killings / attacks in the UK......
But anyway, your point doesn't hold much water....

You want them to wait until AFTER a load of attacks before banning them?

OK, now I appreciate that using my argument then there could be a pre-emptive ban on everything that presents the remotest risk to people, but we're talking about swords here...which are primarily designed to slice people.

I'm not defending the "nanny state", but I fail to see why people are so against this. The Victorian government has said that a dangerous object with no inherent utility should not be owned by its citizens unless they have good reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. With what you are saying I see it becoming a real boring planet

No sky diving/could get killed
No speed boats/could get killed
No race cars/could get killed
No atv's/could get killed
No Sking/could get killed
None of the tools for these sports have no utility in my opinion.
And I disagree if the popluation at large has no business owning swords then the ninjas and movie makers don't need them either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. If you're going to argue, please think about what you're saying
Rather than just piping up rubbish.

I don't mean to be offensive but NONE of your comparisons work.

In everything that you list, the risk is to the individual participating in the activity of their own free choice. Certainly I'll concede that observers may occasionally be the victim of a freak accident, but it's never deliberate, never used as a weapon, and generally speaking an observer will be consciously aware of the potential danger they're in and can leave if they so wish. All of the activities you list have a distinct utility i.e. fun and fitness.

The point with the sword "ban" (and it isn't actually a ban) is that it's to prevent people purchasing a WEAPON and using it to cause injury to SOMEONE ELSE without their consent. The weapon has no particular inherent utilitiy with the possible exceptions of martial artists or collectors, both of whom ought to be able to provide decent justification for their continued ownership of a sword.

Now I don't happen to think that the general population should be allowed to own RPGs, but I have no objection to them being used by documentary makers or military personnel.

Look, I don't really care either way on this issue, but if you're going to try to argue with me then at least try to say something that relates to the situation and my comments.

P.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Steak knives are a weapon and concealable too
Do you want them only restricted to chefs with permit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. No. I don't want anything banned.
Especially not something with such inherent utility.

I don't even WANT swords banned. I'm merely saying that if the government wants to restrict ownership of swords to people who can give a reasonable explanation for why they want one, I'm not going to be in the streets protesting against it.

I don't see it as a first step on an inevitable journey towards a totally restrictive nanny-State. The government already places a great many restrictions on our daily lives. This extra one would be a minor incovenience to a very small number of people. It's a very specific law, not the mandate that we all wear rubber suits and use plastic cutlery in case we hurt ourselves.

P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. "but I fail to see why people are so against this"
Yes you do have an opinion about this. I have investigated murders with baseball bats, hammers, screwdrivers, bricks, a garbage pail lid of all things, peice of broken glass from a glass top coffee table, arson, of course guns, have also investigated two shootings that were determined to be self defense. I guess what I'am saying is it is really stupid to ban objects. Only we to keep everybody safe is to have everyone wearing a straight jacket in a padded cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-03 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yes, I have an opinion...
My opinion is that the government already places many restrictions on people in order to reduce the risk of death and injury, e.g. compulsory wearing of seatbelts or helmets for motorcyclists.

I don't even WANT swords banned. I'm merely saying that if the government wants to restrict ownership of swords to people who can give a reasonable explanation for why they want one, I'm not going to be in the streets protesting against it.

I don't see it as a first step on an inevitable journey towards a totally restrictive nanny-State. The government already places a great many restrictions on our daily lives. This extra one would be a minor incovenience to a very small number of people. It's a very specific law, not the mandate that we all wear rubber suits and use plastic cutlery in case we hurt ourselves.

If the government doesn't do this, then I don't care. I agree that any object can be used as a murder weapon, but some are more uniquely suited to it than others. In some countries it is illegal to own a radar detector that informs you prior to a police speed trap, or illegal to own flick-knives/butterfly knives. It can also be illegal to own the plastic implement that car-thieves use to open car doors. Yes, in theory the banning of an object is absurd - objects don't commit crimes. However, in practice it often makes sense - the banning of an object prevents people from committing a crime with that object. If the object's only purpose is to commit a crime, or if it is inherently suited to committing a crime but has little other utility, then a ban (as a last resort) seems appropriate.

P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocSavage Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. .
No more samari warriors roaming the streets of Vancover now, wheew, what a relief. And as soon as public works gets rid of the jungle canopy, I will not need my machete anymore either.

I understand that on several ocassions people have been killed or injured with bikes, pogo sticks, ropes, irons, stoves, bundles of shingles, nail guns, rabbid dogs, mosquitos, frying pans...well, you get my drift. Now we only have re-runs of Sat Night Live to watch what a real Samari is like. Those things can sure cut a tomato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC