Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The statistics of defensive gun use vs. offensive and accidents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
acerbic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:41 PM
Original message
The statistics of defensive gun use vs. offensive and accidents
Based on a quick sampling of posts here, fresh daily news about e.g. children accidentally shot are "countered" by old articles of defensive gun use which each have no doubt been spammed hundreds of times earlier as response to other fresh daily news. The ratio of "beneficial" gun use to harmful one seems to be something like 0.5-1/100. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. You will also notice
So far, my favorite is the one from three years ago where the gun owner almost shot his own son and then wished he had shot the intruder...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does anyone have a link to real statistics?
Rush Limbaugh must have said that the statistic "You are 100 times more likely to hurt yourself or a family member than an intruder with a gun bought for protection" is a lie. Because they keep telling me, "That's not true. That's not true."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Based on acceptable
statistical analysis principles (accepted only when it proves the anti-gun side) the number of crimes prevented by a civilian gun owner is estimated at 2.5 million annually.

Peddle it else where
Steaming Pantload
and so on and so on and 60,000 so on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Only in gun nut land
http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/tost_3.html#3_e

Table 3.21.....

Estimated percent distribution of self-protective measures employed by victims of violent crime
Attacked offender with weapon....0.9%
Threatened offender with weapon....0.8%

"Forty-five respondents reported a defensive gun use
in 1994 against a person (exhibit 7). Given the
sampling weights, these respondents constitute 1.6
percent of the sample and represent 3.1 million
adults. Almost half of these respondents reported
multiple DGUs during 1994, which provides the basis
for estimating the 1994 DGU incidence at 23
million. This surprising figure is caused in part
by a few respondents reporting large numbers of
defensive gun uses during the year; for example,
one woman reported 52!
Respondents might falsely provide a positive
response to the DGU question for any of a number of
reasons:
o They may want to impress the interviewer by their
heroism and hence exaggerate a trivial event.
o They may be genuinely confused due to substance
abuse, mental illness, or simply less-than-accurate
memories.
o They may actually have used a gun defensively
within the last couple of years but falsely report
it as occurring in the previous year--a phenomenon
known as "telescoping." "

http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/165476.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acerbic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ...and the reason why you don't post fresh stories as proof
...is of course a giant left wing anti-gun media conspiracy that suppresses those stories. :tinfoilhat: :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Just a comment
My curiousity with the "2.5 Million" figure is this: Why aren't there 2.5 Million calls to 911 to back this stat up? Wouldn't/Shouldn't people call 911 after defending their household?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. In fact, if the 2.5 million figure were remotely true
there would be four times as much crime as there actually is,, and three times more shootings and woundings than there actually are.

The 2.5 million defensive gun uses are in the same class as Elvis or UFO sightings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Also got me thinking
Gee, wonder how many "crimes" a barking dog prevents each year. I would bet tens of millions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Using the standard these gun nuts use
not only do barking dogs prevent millions of crimes, but people bitten by stray dogs become criminals...

(The study that showed 2.5 million counted somebody shooting at people on the street outside as a "defensive gun use." )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acerbic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I wonder if the study counted the guy who was going to fire
...a "warning shot" in the air after hearing gunfire somewhere but ended up killing his neighbor as defensive gun use... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Probably
Probably also counted the luckless babboo who shot himself after his truck got sideswiped...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm sure they also counted
Robin the crime-fighting mom...and hers was as real as some of the others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Dr. Arthur Kellerman
did a study in the New England Journal of Medicine...

http://www.tf.org/tf/violence/firearms/facts/gunhome.shtml

Needless to say, right winng loonies have beenn screaming nonnstop that it is a "lie." blah blah blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. New favorite
The "crime fighting mom" turns out to have lied about her gun wielding exploit to hide her thefts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC