Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just saw Bowling for Columbine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:43 PM
Original message
Just saw Bowling for Columbine
Despite the fact that I said that I'd never see it, I decided to see if it was all that it was cracked up to be.

I have to admit, the first 90% of the film was fair, balanced, and a very objective look at the roots of violence in the USA.

It was only when he covered the K-Mart thingie and Charlton Heston that he lost me. What were the points there?

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Presumably how easy it is
to buy the stuff...and so young...and in such quantities.

And that the NRA's leading spokesman needed to be queried in a movie about violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Love Michael Moore, but he's no sociologist.
Pointing out how violent America is, is one thing, but answering why is quite another. Sociologists and criminologists have teased this thing apart for years (The Crime of Punishment by Menninger in the 1950s, I think - any scholars out there?), and Moore's attempt to find causes is lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosalux Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. No Sociologist, but good start!
I agree that Moore needs more sociology in his analysis, but I think he hits on a very key issue--the US culture and social structure devalues human life (no health care, no safety net) while other societies (Canada, Western European) demonstrate that humans deserve a certain standard of living no matter who they are.
If you devalue human life, this makes violence a hell of a lot easier to justify. But Moore doesn't go far enough, he needs to say that it is free market Capitalism behind the devaluing of humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree, spent many years in Germany and they do value
human life, I guess that is why abortion is not legal there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But knowing the German Govt mindset
since the German population is ageing, and the Germans arent having many kids, abortion kills off future taxpayers to pay for all the social programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. sorry , but...
Abortion is legal in Germany. Strict rules apply (reason / counselor has to be asked), but the famous $218 StGB allows abortions until the 12. week: Abortion after talking to a counselor is legal.


But you are in part correct: there are generally too few children to keep the nation going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll Be Watching It Later This Month
It's coming to DIRECTV Pay-Per-View on September 18th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is an excellent film
Moore really socks the NRA gun murderer apologists right in the gut. I'm surprised that they haven't jumped all over your post, like they do every other BFC post.
The film is excellent. It's vintage Moore.
The major point he tries to make, is that our country is different than others. We have a media, and a de facto racist society that breeds fear. That fear leads us to gun violence.
Moore makes the point that the guns aren't the problem, it's the people. Something that the NRA likes to say at other times, but is completely silent about with regard to Moore's film.
Moore's point about KMart was that they made it too easy for the killers. All they had to do was walk into KMart and buy the bullets for their killing spree. KMart was willing to sell to them, no questions asked. It wasn't until Moore accompanied the 17 year old shooting victims as they successfully purchased ammo at a local Michigan Kmart, that KMart realized the folly of their ways.
It was a very moving moment, when KMart announced their decision to cease sales of handgun ammo.
As for Heston, Moore took it right to Moses. President Heston felt it was ok to go to Denver, and then Flint, Michigan (after the Columbine incident, and the shooting of a first grader, by another first grader) and hold a pro-gun rally. His point was that Heston's an idiot.
Is Heston still their President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I Don't Think So
If memory serves correctly, Charleton Heston stepped down as NRA prez a while back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. In fact
As the film neared release, Heston announced that he had "Alzheimer-like symptoms"....and after it came out, he retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. One of my favorite documentaries
of all time :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. I Saw It Over The Weekend
It was on DirecTV Pay Per View.

I was very impressed with it. A few section were a bit too intense for my wife - she left the room for a while after the newsreel footage of people being shot. But I thought it was very well done.

I believe the points made with the Kmart & Heston footage were as follows:

o - Private citizens CAN make faceless corporations do the right thing.

o - Chuck Heston bacame so blinded by the rights of gun owners that he could not see the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It was an excellent film
that showed Heston for the vain unthinking boob he was....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. rights of gun owners...
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 02:49 PM by Fescue4u
"Chuck Heston bacame so blinded by the rights of gun owners that he could not see the rest of the world."

But that is what his job is. Taking care of the rest of the world is a pretty big job..even for moses himself.

While one may disagree with the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, gun owners, the NRA and Heston himself, you cannot deny that as president of the NRA, his job IS TO DEFEND GUN OWNERS RIGHTS.

One could levy the same argument against the president of American Cancer Society...that all they are concerned with is cancer and they ignore the needs of all other ill people.

Indeed, we can say the same about Sarah Brady...She is so blinded by destroying the rights of gun owners, that she cannot see the rest of the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. WRONG!!!!!
Indeed, we can say the same about Sarah Brady...She is so blinded by destroying the rights of gun owners, that she cannot see the rest of the world.

I've seen nothing that indicates this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. lets just agree to disagree on THAT one.
Frankly I hope you are right.

I truly hope that she does things other than attempt to destroy the Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Moore should be proud of himself...
...he helped nudge K-Mart into bankruptcy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, that was Martha Stewart
and her $30/gallon buckets of paint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Also Wrong!!!!!
As a former Kmart employee (1993 - 95), I can tell you that Kmart was heading toward bankrupcy for years. They didn't invest enough in their stores, so many of them were dirty and dingy when compared to Wal-Mart. And Wal-Mart was able to beat them pricewise.

You can't blame Michael Moore - it was mismanagement at the highest levels of the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I agree it was mismanagement
And we got a nice little demonstration of that mismanagement when Kmart pulled a perfectly legal, profitable product off the shelves, in response to a blowhard with a camera.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. But How Much Did That Affect Their Bottom Line???
I'm sure ammo sales didn't even amount to a decimal point on their ledger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemInIdaho Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Guns are not about money to honest Americans
Gun ownership is in our constitution. I suggest we not try to take guns out of our constitution but instead educate those that don't understand what the constitution means to honest Americans.

If you are trying to destroy our constitution you will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I'm Not Trying To Destroy ANYTHING
BTW, "guns" per se are not specifically called out in the Constitution - it says "arms". That could mean swords, lances, or pea shooters.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. I would expect anyone who was trying to destroy the constitution
To say exactly the same thing.

Actions speak far louder than words.

Those who oppose the 2nd ammendment, oppose the entire Consititution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. That was a micosm of mismanagement.
Multiply their lack of judgement across all products and you have the end result...bankrupcty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Maybe Kmart didn't like the negative publicity
that goes along with selling ammo to underage buyers and thereby aiding them in their killing spree. I can't imagine any corporation welcoming THAT kind of publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Closing the barn door eh?

But then again, few reasonable people would hold Kmart responsible for actions of a a couple lunatics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Kmart Did The Reasonable and Responsible Thing
IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yes I agree.
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 08:31 PM by Fescue4u
Filing bankruptcy was the most responable and reasonable choice given their history of bad mangement and fiscal irresponsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-03 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. You're completely ignorant of the facts
again. Kmart declared bankruptcy long before Michael Moore held their feet to the fire. Of course, after they stopped selling handgun ammo, they emerged from bankruptcy protection, so I guess their decision to stop selling the bullets, saved them from bankruptcy. At least I have the timeline in the proper order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Not too sure of your timeline..
...correct me if I'm wrong.
K mart started their bankruptcy in january 2002 didn't they? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1829736.stm

And announced an end to ammo sales in July 2001
http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2001/07/05/kmart.html

You could certainly say that Kmart was in trouble before Moore started in on him, but not that the bankruptcy had already started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. That's a pretty gross assumption
that the Columbine killers were the ONLY criminals who used Kmart as a source for their weapons of murder. I get the feeling that there were several others before them. Of course, after Michael Moore went to Troy, that one bullet availability loophole was closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Are you an economist?
I've read many many opinions about why Kmart sought bankruptcy protection. None of them said that the lack of bullet sales was to blame. Of course, Kmart was bankrupt long before this film came out, and Kmart has now emerged from bankruptcy.
Apparently, Moore inspired so many of us liberals to start shopping at Kmart, that they are now financially viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. I Thought the Gun Crowd Was Blaming That on Rosie O'Donnell
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. thats pretty close to my assessment as well.
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 02:36 PM by Fescue4u
I actually enjoyed about 90%. But the remaining 10% was so contrived and obtuse, that it destroyed the larger effort.

For me it was the Heston stunt, the Kmart Stunt, and the outright lies about the little girl who was killed in Detroit (he lied about the NRA showing up 48 hours later)

Overall its a very Ironic movie..

Ironic because Moore does a good job of pointing out the hype and fear propelled by the media....by using hype and fear.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Don't forget the rocket stunt
Implying that launch vehicles for communications satellites had anything to do with delivery of nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Don't forget that bullet stunt
where Moore implied that the pieces of lead traversing human bodies and destroying the vital organs within had anything to do with those people's deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Moore is pretty weak if he has to imply THAT (lol)

Surely you don't suggest that Moore made an entire movie, only to -suggest- that flying bullets are deadly?

I think most of us figured that one out a long time ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. The rocket inaccuracy would be forgiveable
Edited on Mon Sep-22-03 08:29 PM by Fescue4u
If it were isolated.

Even the most highly financed blockbuster always have bloopers.

But in this case, the rocket incident was yet another item among of litany of "errors".

"errors" that strangly always found themselves on the anti-rights side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-03 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Those so-called 'errors'
pretty much only exist in the minds of the paranoid NRA members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Shhhhhhh....
If you keep that up, we'd have to pay attention to what Moore actually SAID
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC