Doesn't that seem just a tad
silly?
How about we ask everybody's favourite site:
http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvintl.htmlSweden, homicide rate, 1993: 1.3 / 100,000 population
US homicide rate, 1993: 5.7 / 100,000 population
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/crime.htm"Since the definition of homicide is similar in most countries, absolute comparisons of rates are possible. For the period 1998 to 2000, the average rate (the number of homicides per 100,000 population) was 1.7 in EU Member States with the highest rates in Northern Ireland (3.1), Spain (2.8) Finland (2.6), Scotland (2.2) and Sweden (2.1). The rate in England & Wales (1.5) was below the average. For the other countries, the highest rates were found in South Africa (54.3), Estonia (11.4), Lithuania (8.9), Latvia (6.5) and the USA (5.9)."
Source: Barclay, Gordon & Cynthia Tavares, "International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics 2000," Home Office Bulletin 05/02 (London, England, UK: Home Office Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, July 12, 2002), p. 3, from the web at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb502.pdf, last accessed Oct. 12, 2002.
(I would imagine there were some other countries with rates higher than the US rate, and I am *not* citing the source as authority for any assertion that there were not.)
Sweden's estimated population in 2000: 8,873,052
900 homicides = more than 10 homicides for every 100,000 people -- or more than 1 homicide for every 10,000 people.
That is:
five times the 1998-2000 average of 2.1 homicides for every 100,000 people. And just how likely is that?
The US has 5.6 homicides for every 100,000 people; fewer than .6 homicides for every 10,000 people.
My best advice to anybody who believes the silliness in that article is: get real. Or maybe: get a clue.
.