Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel protests anti-Israel suits in US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:48 PM
Original message
Israel protests anti-Israel suits in US
Israel protests anti-Israel suits in US
Nathan Guttman
Jerusalem Post
Feb. 26, 2006



Israel has expressed its concerns to the US administration over the latest wave of civil lawsuits against Israeli officials in American courts.

In a letter to Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns, Ambassador Danny Ayalon claims that these suits - against former chief of General Staff Moshe Ya'alon and former Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency head Avi Dichter - interfere with Israel's foreign policy.


http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395488197&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. US Law Does Have "Loser Pays"


Rule 11. Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to Court; Sanctions

    (b) Representations to Court.

    By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,--

      (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;

      (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;

      (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

      (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.


    (c) Sanctions.


      If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subdivision (b) has been violated, the court may, subject to the conditions stated below, impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated subdivision (b) or are responsible for the violation.


        (1) How Initiated.

          (A) By Motion. A motion for sanctions under this rule shall be made separately from other motions or requests and shall describe the specific conduct alleged to violate subdivision (b). It shall be served as provided in Rule 5, but shall not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21 days after service of the motion (or such other period as the court may prescribe), the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected. If warranted, the court may award to the party prevailing on the motion the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm shall be held jointly responsible for violations committed by its partners, associates, and employees.

          (B) On Court's Initiative. On its own initiative, the court may enter an order describing the specific conduct that appears to violate subdivision (b) and directing an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why it has not violated subdivision (b) with respect thereto.


        (2) Nature of Sanction; Limitations. A sanction imposed for violation of this rule shall be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated. Subject to the limitations in subparagraphs (A) and (B), the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.

          (A) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded against a represented party for a violation of subdivision (b)(2).

          (B) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded on the court's initiative unless the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party which is, or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.


        (3) Order. When imposing sanctions, the court shall describe the conduct determined to constitute a violation of this rule and explain the basis for the sanction imposed.



In the US we call this "Loser Pays".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. This is rarely enforced
because of susbsection 2(B) and it does not mean loser pays. It means you cannot commence frivolous lawsuits; that's not the same thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And if you commence a frivolous suit you are subject to sanctions
AND DISBARMENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Same law that got that Latin American General living in Florida
US Alien Tort Claims Act

as long as alleged perps stay out of this country, there's no jurisdiction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. So annoying when your own weapons are turned against you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Israel sometimes whines like Gloria Allred
Get a life, and stay off our business!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Certainly Ernest Bevin was far, far more culpable then
Ya'alon and Dichter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. When does the trial begin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC