Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MK Sarsur: PM threatens Syria, playing with fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:35 AM
Original message
MK Sarsur: PM threatens Syria, playing with fire
Personally, I think Olmert is just getting the "We held back" meme out there as an excuse for the poor showing.

Chairman of the United Arab List-Ta'al party, Knesset Member Ibrahim Sarsur, said that "the prime minister is playing with fire," by stating that Israel will exercise no restraints in a future campaign against Syria.


"While the Arab countries are working on a peace deal with Israel, that will be presented to the UN Security Council at the end of the month, Olmert chooses to threaten Syria and reject initiatives for talks with the Palestinians." (Roee Nahmias)

Ynet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1.  Olmert: Recent War was Deterrent to Hostilities with Syria
Yet another reason why the war was really a good thing after all.

In his first meeting with the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee since the war began, Olmert told lawmakers, "If we have go to war with Syria, we will do away with the limitations on the use of force we placed upon ourselves in Lebanon."

During the war, the government said it did not prevent the military establishment from carrying out its plans. Senior army officers contradicted that claim and said the ground assault was delayed several days by the government.

Reserve officers have complained about lack of strategic guidance and concrete military plans, old equipment and inadequate training, which they said increased the number of casualties sustained by the ground forces.

Nonetheless, Olmert maintained that the war in southern Lebanon sent a clear message to Syria. "What we have done in Lebanon amounts to a deterring element against the Syrians, because they now realize that, while in Lebanon we restrained our use of force, in a campaign against them we will not adhere to such restraints," he asserted.

Arutz Sheva
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Olmert is a sabre-rattling war criminal who just may get his
comeuppance if the entire region decides they've had enough of his shit.

Only time will tell. I have this feeling that this talk of 'doing away with the limitations' they imposed on themselves they just find that just like Lebanon, they might not just be able to mosey in and take over. For so many years Israel has relied on its reputation as the Middle East Barney Badass (due to how easy it won the Six Day War). Just like another criminal regime I can think of it may be finding that it won't be as easy as they think it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The "we were held back" excuse is old as the hills.
It borders on predictable, and was hardly invented by Olmert and his minions. One can find it being used by the French, the Germans, the Japanese, almost anyone that ever got their ass kicked. It is almost diagnostic of being a fool to go off to war in a state of happy optimism or angry enthusiasm. The Churchillian approach ("blood, sweat, and tears") is more realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Nasrallah and Assasd are no better
and should share in the condemnation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ah, they aren't the ones who went and murdered innocent civilians in
Lebanon, were they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. They did in Israel
Any effort to go after one side and not the other for war crimes will be seen as baised, and rightfully so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Who bombed apartment buildings full of innocent civilians? Who
destroyed a country's infrastructure knowing that a humanitarian crisis would follow? What country proudly showed photographs of its childred signing the bombs that the would use to kill other children?

Take a quick look around. Israel and it's lame excuses don't fly anymore. Their only support is the corrupt neos and traitors to this country like the boys of AIPAC.

The Europeans are refusing to let Israel shipments of arms land in their countries for refueling.

Israel has overplayed its hand and used the poor poor pitiful me excuses too many times. And their enemy has had time to figure out that it's either fight to the death or be wiped out. And they're going to have to go it alone. The only help the war criminals running this country will be able to give is armaments. But that's not going to be enough this time. They'll bring down the whole middle east on their heads if they start bombing Syria and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. In other words...
...no more Mr. Nice Guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sorry..............
but Israel wants peace! :sarcasm:

I think Olmert is trying to up his numbers and save his political butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Israel did hold back
Personally, I think Olmert is just getting the "We held back" meme out there as an excuse for the poor showing.

The facts are that the IDF did hold back, using a strategy reminiscent of Vietnam. It failed. Next time (and if the 1701 does not stop the attacks there will be a next time), they will not be nearly so restrained. Also expect commando raids/air strikes to continue whenever the IDF has intel that there are arms shipments in route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sure they did, and it is still an excuse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Look forward instead of looking back
The general attitude in Israel is that they should have kicked Nasarallah's ass. This will not be allowed to happen again. The next conflict (and there will be one if an armed Hezbollah is allowed to continue to poke as Israel), will be much more vicious.

The IDF could have scorched the earth to the Litani and up the Bekaa valley. If there is a round two, they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, it will be much more vicious. On BOTH sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Its not clear that Hezbollah can do much more
For example, the conventional wisdom is that if they had more C-802 missiles they would have used them.

Facts are the Hezbollah is a militia in terrain they know intimately. They can defend that ground well, but their ability to attack elsewhere is limited. Unless they have time to rebuild and restructure, they can not do much more that what they have already shown, otherwise they would have done it.

The only way it could get worse is the intervention of outside forces, most likely Syria and the Lebanese national army, though a DU poster has theorized that a French lead UNIFIL might actually do something too. In that case it goes from a counter insurgency op to conventional war. Last time that happened, Israeli armor would have been in Damascus had the super powers not intervened.

I expect things to flare again, possibly within the next 6-12 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC