Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel dismisses U.N. vote, construction on West Bank barrier will go on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 04:55 PM
Original message
Israel dismisses U.N. vote, construction on West Bank barrier will go on
Israel rejected an overwhelming call by the United Nations to dismantle a massive barrier being built in the West Bank, with a top official dismissing the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday as hostile to the Jewish state.

"The fence will continue to be built," said Vice Premier Ehud Olmert.

Israel says the wall is needed to keep suicide bombers out of the country. The Palestinians say Israel is using the barrier as a pretext to take Palestinian land.

cut

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/10/22/international1504EDT0674.DTL

========================

If there were homicide bombers attacking the U.N., would they want security barriers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't it "defiance" of UN mandates that put Iraq in the crapper?
Just wondering aloud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Israel is special
they can violate Resolutions

Security Council Resolution 242
Security Council Resolution 446
among over 50 other resolutions

and stuff like
The Fourth Geneva Convention, which is a cornerstone of international humanitarian law that ensures minimum protections for civilians in armed conflict and occupation. It forbids, among other things: the construction of settlements on occupied land, unilateral annexation, willful killing of civilians, collective punishment, torture, and the destruction of property without a compelling military reason. It also requires judicial accountability for those who commit war crimes (defined as “grave breaches” listed in Article 147 of the Convention). The Convention fully takes into account military necessity and cannot be violated for “security” reasons.

But hey, they're special, unlike those brown skinned folks. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. This was a General Assembly Resolution
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 09:36 AM by Gimel
Therefore, it is non-binding. The Arab block hates Israel, so of course it passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Arab block
144 countries is much more then only the Arab block. Make it almost the whole world except for USA, Israel and two Islands..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. they will say anything to defend Israel
I know you know that, bluesoul - I thought it was worth a reminder though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Look Resistance
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 10:34 AM by bluesoul
I have no problem if people defend Israel. I have a problem with people defending certain policies or actions. There's my problem. You can be pro-Israel and support people like Amira Hass, Uri Avnery, Gush Shalom or any number of people from Israel that do want to make a difference. There are many that I do admire (not only among the peace movement) Actually as much as I have a problem with people that are virulently anti-Palestinian I have a problem with people that are virulently anti-Israeli as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I should have been clearer
I should have stated in the subject line "say anything to defend everything Israel, right or wrong"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Why is it that the U.S. waged war on Iraq for supposedly
defying U.N. resolutions when Israel continues to defy dozens with impunity?

Why is it that a half a million Iraqis died as a result of 12 years of U.S.-led U.N. sanctions, depriving them of necessities, like food and medicine, and the U.S. continues to give generous monetary aid to Israel?

And why did it evoke U.S. national outrage when France threatened to use its U.N. veto, for the third time ever, against war with Iraq, when the U.S. had used its own veto 86 times, usually in support of its ally, Israel?

Just wondering.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dudeness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. hi rhiannon
but i am guessing you know the answers to those questions..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eablair3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. yup, it was 144 to 4
"Israel rejected an overwhelming call by the United Nations to dismantle a massive barrier being built in the West Bank, with a top official dismissing the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday as hostile to the Jewish state."

yup, 144 hostile countries out there in the world.

the four voting for Israel are: (1) Israel; (2) USA; (3) The Marshall Islands; and (4) Micronesia.

144 votes against Israel. "They're just hostile to the Jewish state." Sure is a lot of "anti-semitism" out there. {sarcasm}

You'd think with votes like this that more people of Israel might start to re-think their country's positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. as oppossed to the other binding resolutions that are ignored
by Israel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. The US vetoed the Security Council vote
It would have passed otherwise.

The US--the evil Bush administration, to be exactt-- is the only goverment on earth that actually defends this provocative, illegal, and immoral policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there were homicide bombers...
targeting the UN orginating from New York City, would they carve a path through Manhattan and build a huge wall on it, then for all practical purposes annex the land?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Maybe, but
...the UN is not a sovereign state. It is a guest of the US, and could conceivably locate elsewhere, for instance, off the coast of London, on a Virgin Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hmm interesting similarities
That's what those freepers and their likes are saying, that the UN should be shoved somewhere (preferebly into the sea).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
43. Not a recommendation
I did not say the UN should be shoved somewhere (preferebly into the sea)

That suggestion has similarities to what the Palestinians and their friends propose for Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reason
This is the reason why Israel must be considered to be a rogue state.

Considering that only America, the Marshall Islands and Micronesia are on Israel's side in this and many other matters brought to the UN, the "anti-semitism" explanation has no credibility and in fact cheapens and trivializes the victims of genuine anti-semitism.

Pitting oneself against the entire world can't and won't work indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Walls of any kind
won't keep out suicide/homicide bombers.

Interesting that Bush is presiding over an Israel building walls, whereas Reagan wanted walls gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. maybe because
some politicians back then had the balls to at least confront Israel's racist aggression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah
Like sending Marines to Lebanon, only to retreat when attacked, thereby giving Hizbollah it's first big victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Are you kidding, Gimel?
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. It's true
There was a lot of talk on the news shows about this in the past few days, as it was the 20th anniversary of this atrocity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. The Berlin Wall
was the most highly fortified barrier the Soviets could build.
It was not really a "wall", but rather a no-mans-land with two distinct walls about 100 yards apart. In the gap were minefields, guard dogs, rotating machine guns, sentry roads etc.
Yet from 1961 to 1989 more than 5,000 people got through.
At least the Soviets built the wall on the actual border between the Soviet sector and the three-party western sector. Imagine Kennedys reaction if the Soviets had tried to incorporate 55% of the American sector into the Soviet sector!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another story on the same topic
A few of the details differ and there is additional information.

Israel to Keep Building Barrier Despite UN Censure

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=3669783
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yotam Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Israel defending its citizens from terrorists?
Unacceptable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. no problem with building the wall - just make it on Israeli soil ...
...all of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. The problem is that it restricts travel, which has already been made
very difficult, with the various checkpoints, etc. I heard of one Palestinian farmer who was prevented from reaching his fields. It is things like this that fuel the fire of rage. And I don't think anyone is safer. Your idea is, however, better than what they have come up with.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dudeness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. suicide bombing has been a regular atrocity
Edited on Fri Oct-24-03 05:54 AM by dudeness
in the civil war taking place in SriLanka..but rather than partition their own island..bott sides are seeking to negotiate a settlement..this seems to me a mature response..perhaps the absence of superpower influence is helping the process..after all ..SriLanka is only famous for tea and cricket and holds no strategic value to the west...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It sounds like a mature response to me, as well
This conflict could use some superpower influence, but Bush* continues to look the other way or issue lukewarm criticisms of the latest atrocity. As for being of strategic value to the West, unlike Iraq or Saudi Arabia, Israel is about the only place in the Middle East where there is absolutely no oil!


"Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!"

Golda Meir, Prime Minister of Israel, at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, NY Times 10 Jun 73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adalah Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
28. Israel has a duty to protect her citizens
and it would be difficult for me to criticize a security barrier along the green line. Yet many of her citizen's live beyond it, so a barrier may extend beyond that to incorporate them. This is another illustration of why the settlements are so problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Right.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. This is getting old....quickly.
Edited on Tue Oct-28-03 04:00 PM by drdon326


earnest and julio did less "whining" than you do.

perhaps you want to actually comment on the thread....

for a pleasant change??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I agree
this is getting old quickly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. PS Don
"perhaps you actually comment on the thread...for a pleasant change??"

I must have missed your comments...what were they again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I was commenting....
on your comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. but no comments on the actual story right?
So my commenting about someone's comments is wrong,but when you do it it's ok.

At least you're consistant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hey Herschel: Will they use smell-detectors?
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 06:44 PM by edzontar
Or have Ay-rab-sniffin' dogs at the check-points?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. Experience teaches
that if the UN is attacked by bombers, the UN tucks tail and runs. Israel doesn't have that option ... and that's a blessing, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Why are you talking about the UN as though it's a state?
It's not. It's an international organisation made up of many states, including Israel. What's more, it's not a state that's building a fence in territory that doesn't belong to it against the wishes of the people living in that territory....

Violet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Who attacked the U.N. and ran? I think I missed that.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Lebanon
UN Peace Keepers were stationed in the buffer zone of Southern Lebanon. Is this what you're referring to, Blitz? When the Hizbollah fighters crowded into the UN buildings, or into buildings where civilians were given for safety? I think the UN personnel disappeared then. Maybe I can find a reference explaining the history of this battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Thanks, Gimel. There is so very much. And it never ends.
Each day I read something that tears at my heart or tries my patience. And that's not even counting the continuing deaths on both sides in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. they did, In Bagdad
"If there were homicide bombers attacking the U.N., would they want security barriers?"

but they probably want it on their own property, rather than
thru somebody else's yard ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lotteandollie Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
45. Led by the French, they would either..
...surrender of move out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Welcome to DU, lotteandollie!
What would you suggest? I have discussed this until I am all out of answers.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lotteandollie Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thank you. Things will have to get worse...
...before they get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. You're so very welcome. I just pray that things won't get worse
They have already gotten so very bad. These people, on both sides, have been given hope so many times, just to see it snatched away. We need a permanent solution here. I haven't got the answers, but continue to post here in a spirit of hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC