Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seasoned Negotiator to Serve as a Mideast Envoy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:10 AM
Original message
Seasoned Negotiator to Serve as a Mideast Envoy

By MARK LANDLER
WASHINGTON — President Obama moved swiftly to engage on the Middle East on Wednesday, calling Israeli and Arab leaders on his first morning in office and preparing to appoint a seasoned peace negotiator and former senator, George J. Mitchell, as his special emissary to the region.

Mr. Obama did not announce any new initiatives, though he promised deeper American involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict than was evident during the Bush administration, which steered clear of the peace effort in its early days.

In calls to leaders in Egypt, Jordan and Israel, and the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mr. Obama said he would work to solidify the cease-fire in Gaza and pledged “his commitment to active engagement in pursuit of Arab-Israeli peace from the beginning of his term,” said his spokesman, Robert Gibbs.

The American effort will include help for Israel in stemming the smuggling of arms to Hamas militants, as well as aid for the Palestinian Authority in rebuilding Gaza, Mr. Obama said.

Also on Wednesday, the Senate confirmed Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state, by a vote of 94 to 2, a day later than scheduled because of lingering objections by some Republicans. Only two senators, David Vitter of Louisiana and Jim DeMint of South Carolina, voted against her.


Mr. Mitchell’s appointment, which could be announced as soon as Thursday, underscores the central role that the Middle East has assumed in the Obama administration.

A former Senate majority leader who helped broker a peace deal in Northern Ireland, Mr. Mitchell also led a commission searching for ways to stop violence between Israelis and Palestinians.

He is viewed as a diplomatic heavyweight who may bring more balance to Washington’s relationships in the region.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/us/politics/22diplo.html?_r=1&ref=middleeast&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. This actually gives me some small modicum of hope
that our unbalanced approach over I/P might change- at least a little.

Good choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. At last -- something we can all agree upon!
I am overjoyed by the appointment of someone who is simply NEUTRAL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent news IMO
As I said in another thread, I'm a great admirer of Mitchell, because of his helpful contribution to the Northern Ireland peace agreement. Let's hope he can make a similar contribution in the Middle East!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Erekat calls for US action regarding Israeli aggression
GAZA, Jan 22 (KUNA) -- Palestinian Authority Chief Negotiator Saeb Erekat on Thursday called on the new US Administration to jumpstart immediate efforts aimed at an Israeli ceasefire. Erekat called on the US Administration to hastily facilitate an Israeli withdrawal from all occupied Arab lands by Israel since 1967, and for the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

He also called on Washington to solve the final stage issues of the peace process, in particular the issue of refugees, based upon legitimate international resolutions in regard.

"The continuation of Israeli occupation, (Israel's) settlement policies, the separation wall, aggression, the siege, closure and the imposition of facts on the ground result in the expansion of the width of violence, chaos, extremism and bloodshed," said Erekat.

He also stressed that "the aims of the peace process are precise and explicit through legitimate international resolutions, the road map and the Arab peace initiative which call for the halt of the Israeli occupation which started in 1967." On the internal Palestinian state of affairs, Erekat said, "The priority is for (Palestinian Authority) President Mahmoud Abbas, particularly in achieving Palestinian national reconciliation under the sponsorship of Egypt and aimed at forming a national conciliation Palestinian government." (end) zt.sd KUNA 221622 Jan 09NNNN

http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesPublicSite/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=1970585&Language=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Abbas aide: Hamas obstructing efforts to reconcile with Fatah
Ramallah - A top aide of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas accused Hamas Thursday of 'obstructing' efforts to reconcile the warring Palestinian political factions, by raising 'new conditions.'

Yasser Abed Rabbo said Abbas' secular Fatah movement was willing to form a national unity government with Hamas.

But the radical Islamist movement was raising new conditions because it was not interested in reconciliation and was instead working to consolidate its hold over the Gaza Strip, he said.

He accused Hamas of killing, arresting and torturing Fatah fighters in Gaza.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/middleeast/news/article_1455107.php/Abbas_aide_Hamas_obstructing_efforts_to_reconcile_with_Fatah_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Now that Abbas' term has expired, and he is dead in the water... SUDDENLY
Fatah wants a unity gov't? LOL~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm just watching the rhetoric.
But yeah, if only this had been on the table a year or two ago.

I do think Obama will prop up the PNA and try to get Fatah and Hamas to put aside their differences, he needs a legitimate Palestinian voice to force the Israelis to make peace with. But that's just speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree, and I think there are many voices that Hamas would agree to have
speak on behalf of the Palestinian people. I don't think Abbas is that guy.

The real question will be: Presidential elections are overdue. Israel will be going to the polls. Will Palesetinians be allowed to vote ever again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's an interesting question.
If you really want the job done right, that would be the first step, new elections (on both sides, but Israel is already doing that, it doesn't need permission).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And an interesting test for our new president. Personally, I think there would
have to be much behind-the-scenes work done to ensure that US-approved candidates were elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Boy, can I call them or what:
---

But many Middle East experts are eager to hear whether the Obama administration will try to create a credible, unified Palestinian government that could negotiate and enforce a state-to-state relationship with Israel, the essence of the so-called two-state solution that has dominated peace negotiations.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=124x252267

On your other issue, he can't really do that if he wants to create a legitimate Palestinian political agent. The elections have to be fairly honest or the result will not be accepted. I'm pretty sure he knows that, but only his actions can make it clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Some other interesting bits in that piece:
---

“Hamas feels it has come out unbroken and popular among Palestinians and Arabs,” said Khalil Shikaki, a Palestinian analyst and pollster. “French statements also embolden it. Hamas won’t accept a government led by Fayyad and would want to lead it,” a prospect, he added, that Mr. Abbas “would find hard to accept.” Part of the deal would be early elections in the next six months, he said.

---

Mr. Abbas has proposed early elections for his office and the legislature, which Hamas won in free elections in 2006. But he also wants to change the electoral rules to benefit Fatah, making the election a straight vote for parties and removing the constituency voting for individual candidates that so benefited Hamas last time.

Hamas rejects the changes and elections for legislators before their four-year terms expire a year from now. Yet if Hamas did accept early elections as part of a negotiated national government or accord, it could win the presidency, said Zakariya al-Qaq, a political scientist at Al Quds University in Jerusalem, for Mr. Abbas is considered a spent force.

---

Yossi Alpher, the Israeli co-director of www.bitterlemons.org, a Web site that promotes Israeli-Palestinian dialogue online, said that if there were a unity government, there would probably be new elections. “Given Hamas’s political gains and Abu Mazen’s losses, Hamas could win them, and then they’d end up running not just Gaza but the West Bank, too, at least politically,” he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. It will be interesting to see how Hamas responds to the suggestion of
early elections. I know they had eschewed the idea, viewing it as a semi-coup. I wonder if their newfound popularity will change their view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yes, it will.
Everyone (not just Hamas) is making assertive noises, but I think there is still a lot of feeling out and assessment going on, and Mr Obama has not weighed in as to what he thinks should be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sen. Mitchell would be the best choice of those who would actually have credibility on all sides.
I think former Sen. Mitchell would be the best choice of those who would actually have credibility on all sides.

When I read the May 20, 2001 Mitchell Commission Report which examined the causes of the second intifada in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, I cannot say that I am in complete agreement.

http://www.mideastweb.org/mitchell_report.htm

However, I do see a sincere effort to act in a balanced manner and to pursue honest fact finding and to establish findings and make recommendations dispassionately and reasonably.

There may be someone who would be better at this than former Sen. Mitchell. But I cannot think of anyone who would hold more credibility on all sides and who would act in a more balanced manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. abe foxman is concerned
that mitchell may be too "fair"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The "concern" of those lobbyists is proof positive that this was a terrific appointment.
Isn't that interesting?

All the Palestinian supporters want is someone who is fair. Not Arab. Not Muslim. Not Pro-Palestinian. Just fair.

What a concept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. He is an Arab
He is noted here on the Arab American Institute's web site under "Famous Arab Americans"

http://www.aaiusa.org/arab-americans/23/famous-arab-americans

Your comment seemed to imply that he was not an Arab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. he's american
period. the fact that foxman would dare complain that someone was going to be fair in their i/p dealings is very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He is an Arab American
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 01:06 PM by oberliner
The post I was responding to included the following: "All the Palestinian supporters want is someone who is fair. Not Arab. Not Muslim. Not Pro-Palestinian."

This seems to suggest that Mitchell is not Arab, when, in fact, he is identified as a prominent Arab American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. i read it as
the palestinians werent asking for one of their own to be the envoy, they just wanted fairness. you brought up the fact that mitchell is an "arab american" for your own purposes i suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Diversity is absolutely essential
I think it is very important to have people from a variety of different backgrounds represented in government, especially when it comes to foreign policy.

Arab Americans have, unfortunately, been grossly underrepresented, so Mitchell's appointment is refreshing in that regard.

I also think that he is probably one of the fairest people Obama could have selected.

Kudos to Obama for the choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. We'll see how that plays out.
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 01:44 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
I've known of him for decades, and never knew of his ancestry.

He certainly doesn't proclaim it.

Nonetheless, pro-Pals never demanded an Arab... just someone who is fair.

What do you personally think of the appointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I'm very pleased with the appointment
Great choice by Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. This Is An Excellent Appointment, Ma'am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC