Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barghouti to Obama: 2 states now or a long violent struggle over apartheid because 'we will be free'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:18 AM
Original message
Barghouti to Obama: 2 states now or a long violent struggle over apartheid because 'we will be free'
Philip Weiss reports:

It is hard to imagine that after all the coverage of Gaza you could go into an event in New York and walk out stunned, but such was my experience hearing Mustafa Barghouti this afternoon at Columbia University. The Palestinian doctor and politician who lives in the West Bank got into Gaza for a week at the end of the onslaught-- it took him two days to get there from Ramallah, through Jordan and Egypt, in what should have been a 1-1/2 hour hour trip--and entered with the belief that his nonstop watching of Al-Jazeera had prepared him for the destruction. It did not.

"What I've seen shocked me.... Believe me, when I went there I was shocked to the level that for the first time in my life, I could not talk about it for four days. And now it is my duty to tell the people of the world what has happened to the people of Gaza."

The old people Barghouti talked to said they had never seen anything like it either--not in ’48, ’56, ’67, '88, or 2000. "They all told me that this has been the most brutal thing they have ever seen." And so his job today, before getting to any politics, was to bear witness to a room filled to bursting with 220 people or so, many of them Palestinian intellectuals in the Diaspora, as Barghouti put it.
It is hard to convey Barghouti’s presentation in a piece of writing without being numbing. He showed us gruesome photos of the mysterious armaments that burned their way down into people’s flesh, eating their skin and tissue away. He told the stories of five daughters killed in one family, and of another two girls who watched their father, who had left the house after three days to get water, shot and bound and left in the street to serve as a target dummy. His wife and daughters watched their father executed. "That is the story I heard from his wife," he said, voice breaking.

He said that families that had fled the attacks often divided their children and left them in different houses, so that a strike would not kill all their children at once. And the Gazans had reason to fear this: the killing of 1300 is equivalent to a quarter million Americans dying.

"Have you see these images on U.S. television?" One picture after another of leveled neighborhoods, bulldozed factories. Before the onslaught, there had been 351 working factories left in Gaza, "the last remaining part of the private sector that was not destroyed yet." Most were destroyed. "They were destroyed when the Israeli army was leaving Gaza in the last two days.The Israeli army put dynamite in them." He showed us pictures of one man’s factory where the Israelis in leaving had demolished the factory, his gardens, his trucks, his cars.

"And up to this moment they are not allowing a single sack of cement to enter Gaza." And most of the glass in Gaza was shattered, but glass is not allowed in either, as a "strategic material." Windows are covered with plastic.

Of course, this kind of horror requires analysis, and it was here that the talk left the realm of physical destruction to go the true devastation, the Israeli soul.

Israeli society is deeply corrupt. It is dominated by generals who are churned out year after year by the military industrial complex, and it depends on sales of armaments to other countries. The Gaza destruction had this as one of its motivations, in addition to regime change, which failed, and electing Kadima/Labor, which also failed: a weapons show. These policies have hurt the Israeli people. "The Israeli public got the right message from this kind of brutal approach. If brutality is the only thing that will work with the Palestinians, then we should choose Lieberman, who is a neofascist."

It is not sufficient to say that the Israelis moved right in the recent election. Israel always moves to the right. "This is a move towards racism, this is a move towards extremism. This is a move that in my opinion is a declaration, that Israel is accepting to be an apartheid state. This is the last chapter where occupation has corrupted the Israeli society."

Many questions from the students, most of them evidently Arab.

Who will form the governing coalition in Israel? Who would he choose? Barghouti said: Barack Obama. That is the only hope for the Israelis. That Obama will now put actions behind his good gestures, the Mitchell appointment, and truly try to make a just settlement in Israel/Palestine now.

"We are exactly at that very specific point of the last chance for the two-state solution. It is closing." It is closing because Israel has committed itself to a policy of dispossession and Bantustanization of the Palestinian people, and it has so far succeeded. The apartheid wall, the security zone, the checkpoints that would make the map black if he showed every one of them-- these are now matched in Gaza by a fresh act of ethnic cleansing, a buffer zone on Palestinian land along the northern and eastern borders of the strip where no house or tree or farm can be, only Israeli forces.

The Palestinians agreed to accept less than half of what the UN gave them in '48 but they will not accept the Bantustans and apartheid. No people would. "Action must be taken for the sake of both peoples...It is about the future of both peoples... There can be no peace with this apartheid system in this place... It has to be a real state. It has to be a real sovereign and democratic state where we are entitled, as Dianne Feinstein said at the inaguration of President Obama--the root of democracy is the right of people to freely choose their leaders. We have to choose our leaders."
Barghouti is for a two state solution because it is "accessible." He wants his daughter to grow up with some sort of hope. He doesn’t want her to grow up in a long violent struggle against apartheid.
I heard only one question from an Israel supporter. What is to be done about the many rockets? Barghouti decried the rockets, but he pointed out (as Sam Husseini did here) that the Six-Day war began when Israel attacked three countries because Egypt closed down access to one port by blockading the straits of Tiran. Gaza has been thoroughly blockaded for years.

My great pity at events like these is a Jewish one. Barghouti the doctor and the young Palestinian intellectuals in the Ivy League space, cramming it, feeling both empowered and victimized, reminded me of nothing so much as my Jewish experience in the Ivy League more than 30 years ago. Also Barghouti spoke feelingly of Jews. He has been in the States four days, and has had several arguments in the media with Israeli supporters. One of these arguments will be on CNN, Fareed Zakaria’s show, this Sunday.

What drives these interlocutors crazy is when he invokes Martin Luther King and Gandhi. "It is so difficult, and I can understand this from a psychological perspective, it is so difficult, for the Jewish people, who have endured such a horrible thing like the Holocaust, and who have endured such horrible things like the suffering of the pogroms of Russia, or the Inquisition of Spain, or somewhere else-- so much suffering, I accept that. But it is so difficult for them to accept the fact that today they are sitting exactly on the chair of the oppressor. And that's why when you speak about that all you get is...'No it is not that!' No it is you. It's time to look in the mirror...It is disrespectful of the victims of the Holocaust to have such a behavior. And that is why Edward Said spoke about us becoming the victims of the victims."

He closed with a summons to Diaspora Palestinians and all those who support them, to be a movement against what he termed the number-one injustice in world affairs now. Help us in our struggle, he said. "Freedom was never given. You have to fight for it. We the Palestinians are determined to be free. And we will be free!"

I took the elevator downstairs. A Jewish girl (I can tell) had her cellphone out, was reporting to a friend about the event. "Well he said a number of inaccuracies. He said that Gaza is the most densely populated place on the earth. When it's only the third or fourth." To this is reduced the tradition that gave the world Maimonides, Spinoza, Arendt, and Mailer.
(Phil Weiss)

http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/02/barghouti-to-obama-2-states-now-or-a-long-violent-struggle-over-apartheid-because-we-will-be-free.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sandrine for you Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. i'm affraid it will last an another 50 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's been too late for some time now.
The "move to the right" is an indication that the public doesn't believe the happy talk any more. The Palestinians have been there for some time now, the Israelis are just catching up with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you see any alternative to armed resistance? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And armed resistance has helped, how?
It has only succeeded in making lives for the people much, much more miserable.

Life before armed resistance was much freer, and the people lived with jobs, more hope.

Armed resistance has brought them a hellish life.

And it will continue to.

Which is why no one can understand why they don't change tactics.

Terrorism will NEVER get the Palestinians a state/

And it will guarantee that there will NEVER be a single state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That depends on who you are and what you want.
It seems most unlikely that armed resistance WILL end any time soon. I do not want to put myself in the position of advocating for that, I just don't foresee any way that it ends, since I don't foresee the conditions that would lead to it ending coming about.

I think if "peace" were to occur anytime soon, it would have to be imposed, and that would generate its own armed resistance. There is no political leadership on either side that looks to me to be remotely up to the job. There is some hope that the USA or the EU or somebody might get their shit together and intervene, but that is no slam dunk either.

So I think what you have now is about as much "peace" as there is going to be, barring vigorous outside intervention.

On the other hand, these things do end, and I would be surprised if this goes on another sixty years, in fact I will be shocked and pleased if the current world political order in general can stick together that long, and I don't think the Israeli state, as it is now constituted anyway, has anything like that much time, and I have held that opinion for some years now. But I don't bring it up much, it just annoys people, and I don't know if I could reduce it to a rational argument, assuming I wanted to do that, although there is a long list of issues that feeds into that opinion, e.g. demographic, social military, political, economic trends, history, and so on; but going into that justs leads to boring useless arguments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I would add that the support of the USA is essential to maintaining the status quo.
It will be very hard to force change while that is so, and once that is no longer so, things will get very unpredictable rather quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That sounds like other questions one hears...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 02:58 PM by LeftishBrit
"Is there any alternative to war?"

"Was there any alternative to bombing Gaza?"

"Is there any alternative to restricting people's liberties as part of the war on terror?"

There are plenty of alternatives. Nonviolent resistance, perhaps combined with a unilateral declaration of independence. Peace negotiations, involving explicit readiness to 'leave Israel alone' if Israel returns to the 67 borders. The two combined might be the most effective.

And: if the Israelis continued the occupation and/or violent tactics against the Palestinians in the face of the above tactics- then a far larger number of people than now *would* support the Palestinians unreservedly, and would support sanctions against Israel. Me, for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. As long as America follows the Bush "peace" doctrine
which is really designed to continue the current staus quo there can not and will not be peace, as long as America continues to use its veto power in the UN to protect Israel there will be no peace, what has to happen is a major overhaul in the approach taken by the US.
As to the famed "nonviolent" resistance there has never really been any not in India not in the US south not in South Africa, yes there have been leaders that promoted it but it never really come about not 100% which seems to be what is required by some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delad Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
9.  i cannot thank you enough
for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Barghouti's rise parallels Avigdor Lieberman's in the eyes of the world."
Phil Weiss adds:

Barghouti (and his shadow, Lieberman)
A few points I left out of my report on Mustafa Barghouti of last night in my haste to report: He was hosted by the Arab Students Association of Columbia University's school of international affairs. The space was a 15th floor faculty lounge in the foreign affairs building with commanding views of midtown, Columbia's quad, and the Jersey bank of the Hudson.

Barghouti was introduced by Saif Ammous, who said the dichotomy you have been fed in this country, between Fatah politicians who are too corrupt to lead a state, and Hamas leaders who are too driven by blind hatred of Jews and westerners to do the same, is a false one, witness our guest. "He is the living talking walking breathing refutation of this dichotomy."

Throughout his appearance, Barghouti was urbane and worldly. He was dressed as a university administrator or thinktank president is dressed. He sat chatting with numerous people beforehand, always with a small smile on his sensitive narrow face. Afterward he stayed for a half hour, even as Michael Brown of the Institute for Middle East Understanding waited to whisk him off to his next event on the East Side.

Barghouti is a star for one reason: because of media; because of the stunning "60 Minutes" report by Bob Simon a month ago. Never has celebrity been so-well deserved. Barghouti is ready. He is familiar with New York and the Palestinian diaspora. He has been here many times, to visit the late Edward Said, whose widow was in the audience. The students in the audience never interrupted his lecture with applause, their only spontaneous response was cries at the photographs he insisted on showing us of white phosphorus victims. The students seemed hungry to get his marching orders: that they must revive the idea of a global Palestine Liberation Organization, which is buried now inside the Palestinian Authority in the bureaucracy of Oslo, which he says Palestinians should not have accepted.


Barghouti's rise parallels Avigdor Lieberman's in the eyes of the world; and that is the entire story. Before the presentation began, watching him as he chatted and listened, seeing his thoughtful head turning and nodding to this person and that one, I felt rage and despair at the conversion of so much of my community, Jewish intellectuals, to a form of religious nationalism that does not allow this fine man to travel the few miles from his home to the place of his birth, Jerusalem, this year, next year or any time at all.

http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/02/barghouti-and-his-shadow-lieberman.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. "The Palestinians agreed to..."
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 12:13 PM by Boojatta
The Palestinians agreed to accept less than half of what the UN gave them in '48 but they will not accept the Bantustans and apartheid.

Who specifically agreed to "accept less than half of what the UN gave them"? Are there any officially Islamic countries where non-Muslims face restrictions on their civil liberties that give them a status akin to that of second-class citizens under apartheid? If a two-state solution is implemented, then is there any reason to believe that people who currently support Hamas would oppose every kind of apartheid in the new Palestinian state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC