Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is, of course, permitted to decide not to use top defense official Amos Gilad as Israel's envoy in negotiations with Egypt. If the prime minister lost his faith in the state's representative on such delicate issues, maybe it is best that Gilad is replaced.
There is no question that Gilad, the director of the Defense Ministry political-security bureau, acted foolishly when he personally attacked Olmert's conduct in an on-the-record conversation with Ma'ariv reporter Ben Caspit.
The fact that the article was published on the same morning as the weekly cabinet meeting that was to focus on the cease-fire agreement with Hamas and the prisoner exchange deal for captive Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, the issues Gilad has been negotiating with the Egyptians, certainly didn't contribute to Olmert's health. Gilad's claim that he did not expect the remarks to be quoted under his name can't be used in his defense. A man who once served as the IDF spokesman is expected to be experienced and careful enough make if very clear, in advance, that he does not wish to be quoted.
At the root of it, apparently, stands the deep-seated mutual hatred between Olmert and Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Gilad himself, Barak's pointman in the Egyptian talks, angered Olmert by displaying an attitude that was viewed in Jerusalem as overly independent. But the Prime Minister's Office intensive interest in the Gilad affair, mere weeks before Olmert's term concludes, is very telling about the nature of Olmert himself.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1066352.html