Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fareed Zakaria: Bibi’s Bluster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:06 AM
Original message
Fareed Zakaria: Bibi’s Bluster

The Israeli Prime Minister says his nation's security is his top priority. Too bad he's undermining it.

By Fareed Zakaria | NEWSWEEK

Published Mar 19, 2010

From the magazine issue dated Mar 29, 2010

In international relations, whenever you hear the term "confidence-building measures," you can be sure that someone is trying to kick a can down the road. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu has now promised to offer such measures to the Palestinians. He has also urged that everyone "calm down" about the diplomatic row between his government and the United States.

But this crisis hasn't been caused by just one event—the announcement, while Vice President Joe Biden was visiting Israel, to approve new Jewish housing units in East Jerusalem. It caps a year of increasingly strained relations between Washington and Tel Aviv. And while he's apologized for the ill-timed announcement, Netanyahu remains unyielding. In fact, the Israeli press has reported plans to build not merely the 1,600 units announced last week, but 50,000. "We will act according to the vital interests of the state of Israel," Netanyahu said last week.

What are those vital interests? If you have listened to Bibi Netanyahu over the past few years, it's clear what tops the list—Iran. In fact, the prime minister has described the Iranian threat as an existential one for Israel, and a grave one for the world. He sees combating it as the central challenge of our times. "We are faced with security challenges that no other country faces, and our need to provide a response to these is critical, and we are answering the call," Netanyahu told his Likud faction in May 2009. "These are not regular times. The danger is hurtling toward us. My job is first and foremost to ensure the future of the state of Israel."

But after watching Netanyahu's government over the past year, I have concluded that he is actually not serious about the Iranian threat. If tackling the rise of Iran were his paramount concern, would he have allowed a collapse in relations with the United States, the country whose military, political, and economic help is indispensable in confronting this challenge? If taking on Iran were his central preoccupation, wouldn't he have subordinated petty domestic considerations and done everything to bolster ties with the United States? Bibi likes to think of himself as Winston Churchill, warning the world of a gathering storm. But he should bear in mind that Churchill's single obsession during the late 1930s was to strengthen his alliance with the United States, whatever the costs, concessions, and compromises he had to make.

read on...
http://www.newsweek.com/id/235229/page/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Netanyahu is making is Israel LESS safe with his ultra-right wing BS
The fact is that right-wingers, whether in the US or ISrael, are typically very poor leaders. The part of Fareed's column about Churchill is dead on. The fact is that BiBi's actions regarding the US are just plain stupid and will not make Israel safer in the long run. How much longer will Israelis allow this bellowing prick to lead them over a cliff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evrstrong Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I love Fareed..
I make sure to watch him every Sunday. He is right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't always love him. I disgree strong with his assertion about Abbas and Fayyad
being great leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What do you have against Abbas ?
Yes there is corruption , but is Hamas a better option ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think he's a sock puppet whose elected term has expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. a sock puppet for whom , the PLO or Israel ....
why do you think he is a sock puppet ? just because Fatah dares to talk with the Israelis.

Do the Palestinians have a better secular option ?

or , judging from your screen name , you prefer a religious leadership rather than a secular one ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. judging from your avatar...
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 01:43 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
What kid of nonsense is that?
The Palestinians have a variety of secular options. You should educate yourself about them.

I have no bone with you personally. I'm not an Abbas fan. In a nutshell, he's become the local implementer of Israel's occupation. He helped overturn democratic elections. He's shown he has no backbone. He's more interested in maintaining his powerbase in the PA than he is in national liberation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think that is a little unfair , he is doing the best he can
considering the circumstances ....

Maintaining order in the west bank and stopping infiltrators from attacking Israel is the only way we can coax Israel to sit on the table and negotiate.


I am not an Abbas fan either , but I think he is honest and doing the best he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You haven't answered the question of whom you prefer to Abbas
that is better than simplify accusing me of ignorance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Mustafa Barghouti
Not to speak for another poster, but that is a name I've seen mentioned often in this context.

Mustafa Barghouti (Arabic: مصطفى البرغوثي‎, strict transliteration Muṣṭafā al-Barġūṯī, also transcribed Mustafa Barghouthi, Mustafa Al Barghuthi; born 1954) is a Palestinian democracy activist. He was a candidate for the presidency of the Palestinian National Authority in 2005, finishing second to Mahmoud Abbas, with 19% of the vote.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Barghouti
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah , and I wanted Dennis Kucinich as president, did not happen , probably will never happen
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 02:29 PM by UndertheOcean
labeling Abbas as an Israeli sock puppet because of his pragmatist policies is really unfair , and not even constructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The PA under his leadership is corrupt beyond measure. That's why Hamas won the last election
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 02:54 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
4 years ago.

Palestinians deserve better than a US-installed dictator, and that's what he is at this time.

It's time for elections. Fair. Free. Honored.

It's time to quit the faux peace process and re-focus energies on national liberation and the creation of democratic institutions and the rule of law.

Playing peace process pretend games with Israel, which refuses to even slow ongoing settlements, isn't the goal. It's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC