|
except what I read in the news. I have heard that "education" tends to be pushed in Jewish families. How does Palestinian culture perceive education?
One should not romantisize any culture.
Including our own. While education is largely fine for those who achieve post secondary degrees, we have a system of social and economic hierarchies, as many as can possibly be created, above the large mass of citizens, largely headed by those who were able to stomach the higher educational process.
That ignores the vast majority who only have high school level education and are largely not compensated at any point in their lives for what they know or the time they spent in a classroom chair doing the bidding of teachers, but only what they can accomplish (often strict labor) for the various pyramidal leaders' benefit instead of their own survival. This is somewhat marked by the absence of survival skills in those of only high school education relative to those considered, for example "professionals", and is further marked by the existence of an educated over-class that preys economically and legally (sometimes even illegally) on the masses at every conceivable opportunity.
I'm not certain this social and economic system is superior in any way, except in its ability through oil to feed a larger mass of people than tribal systems tend to allow, and in creating a certain advanced level of technology in the various sciences that has coincidentally led to a population bubble. From what I've been able to gather, in the "old days", skill sets were passed in families from parents to children. Yes, these skill sets may have been patriarchal in gender orientation. But, at least the children had a skill set passed to them so they could "survive" as an adult, if not thrive.
Modern education, at least in the earlier levels, fails to convey survival skill sets, delaying those value added skills till the second half of post-secondary education, creating a parasitical class that is often arrogant, hypocritical, and non-compassionate towards those of lesser means. Why shouldn't they be? They have what the masses do not, by design, and they revel in it.
It is modern-day society's version of territorialism. Nothing much has changed except the surface appearance.
I'm not convinced that a system of education passed from parent to child wasn't better, although it certainly didn't convey the highly specialized skill sets modern society tends to idealize (romanticize?) so highly. Are we now at the point where even highly specialized skill sets are being marginalized by corporations seeking the lowest paid workers who can be trained to do certain tasks?
In all fairness, there are now too many people for the natural environment to support, and if a Genie came along, wiggled their nose and magically converted our whole society to a hunter-gatherer or even tribal society, there would have to be a severe shrinking of the total world population. Cannibalism would likely rear its ugly head in any type of food shortage.
The larger question in my mind is what right does a modern society have to absorb and convert other alternate social and economic systems? All systems appear to have their own unique problems, and getting rid of one set only serves to create a different set of problems and issues.
|