Much better than the usual drivel.Just as Saddam Hussein was a handy punching bag for U.S. fury over Osama bin Laden, Yasser Arafat had, long before his death, become a convenient scapegoat for failures in Western diplomacy over the 50-year-old Palestinian tragedy. We just don't get it, and we better soon.
The relationship between the Palestinians and the rise of Al Qaeda, between Arafat and the rise of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, needs to be deconstructed. Our whole "war on terror" (and of terror) will continue to be quixotic, if not self-destructive, if we don't take the opportunity of the Palestinian Authority president's death to set a new course, not based on a personality but on history and the needs of the region. At least a pinch of the salt of our own ideals in the soup of the Mideast wouldn't hurt either. And I don't mean force-fed "democracy."
I met Arafat in Beirut on the brink of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, the event Bin Laden referred to — with portent few caught — in his missive to the West just before the U.S. presidential election.
I didn't know it at the time, but I was following in the footsteps of my father-in-law, Robert Rogers, who was the first major network reporter (NBC) to interview Arafat. He was also the first network documentary producer to openly criticize the Vietnam War ("It's a Mad, Mad War," 1964), a courageous trait I'd like to see more of today.
LA Times