Read them all and you get a slightly clearer picture. If that's your intent.
And they should have called the ambulance. But wait. One seemed to have happened along at the checkpoint. How long it was between when the woman got to the checkpoint and it showed up, how long until it became clear to the IDF that she wasn't just in labor but close to delivery, and how long it was until the Red Crescent guys showed up ... still a question. On which hangs your conclusion. But it wasn't a case of just stopping the Palestinian woman out of malice.
---------
http://www.palestinercs.org/pressreleases/Year%202005/PR150205WBRR.htmA woman in labor, Jerusalem ID holder, was denied access by the Israeli soldiers at Kalandia checkpoint, on her route to one of the Palestinian hospitals in Jerusalem. The soldiers claimed that her husband had no permission to enter Jerusalem.
A PRCS ambulance while on its route to one of the Palestinian hospitals in Bethlehem through Kalandia checkpoint, was asked to help the woman. The crew immediately began to assist the woman who delivered after 15 minutes a baby boy.
Both the mother & the baby are in good health and were transferred to Al-Muhtadi hospital in Kufr Aqab, near Ramallah.
....
----------
Now we know she was with her husband, who did not have authorization to enter Jerusalem; this clears up at least one question I had, and one I didn't ask. They wouldn't let him through, but they'd have allowed her. Presumably she didn't want to go on her own. I'm still unclear how long they were at the checkpoint, or why anyone would think labor = uninhibited travel.
I'm not sure where the "passing car" comes into the picture from the first story, but at least it's clear that her son was born at the checkpoint. "Was asked" doesn't say who did the asking; it may have been the woman's husband, the woman, a stranger, or IDF. The ambulance would have be forced to stop at the checkpoint, no doubt; the first guess would be IDF. I'm also not sure where the Aljazeerah second ambulance fits in, or where it got to.
There's more:
--------------
http://www.imemc.org/headlines/2005/feb/week3/021805/birth.htmNiveen Akram Kahleel, 25, from Kafr Aqeb in the West Bank, gave birth recently on a military checkpoint after soldiers stationed at Qalandia checkpoint, north of Jerusalem , refrained from allowing a car transferring her to a Ramallah hospital to pass.
Medical teams of the Red Crescent Society who were present at the checkpoint and the that she is in delivery, managed to reach her and help her deliver her baby, while the soldiers insisted on holding the car transferring her and searching it; the mother and her child are in a good health condition.
A medic at the Red Crescent said that they team saw after arriving at the checkpoint that soldiers are obstructing the road in front of an ambulance, and immediately called other medics to the scene and helped the woman deliver her baby after failing to convince the soldiers to grant passage to the ambulance.
------
In spite of the sketchy grammar, at least we have two sets of medics. I don't understand why the ambulance in one story was allowed through, and in the other, not. Maybe some Israeli/Palestinian can fill in what would be likely. They had a car that wasn't exempt from being searched; perhaps she couldn't drive, so that didn't matter.
And the big question: if she's "from Kafr Aqeb in the West Bank" and wound up at "Al-Muhtadi hospital in Kufr Aqab", um ... was this completely unnecessary--just to make sure the kid was born in Jerusalem? Kafr Aqab is adjacent to Qalandiya, and is much farther from Jerusalem than it is from Ramallah.
Again, *if* the IDF didn't act promptly to get her aid, they should have; it's unclear that aid wasn't forthcoming in short order (Aljazeerah *suggests* it wasn't, other sources suggest it was). But at this point the clearly "the IDF are slimy bastard" story is a bit of a blur.