Terror drills becomes reality

[mogster]

On 911 there were several anti-terror drills, among them a dress rehearsal for a scenario where the terrorists are using airplanes to hit tall buildings. In London on 7/7 2005 there was an anti-terror drill going on involving 1000 persons, where the scenario was simultaneous attacks on buses and subway stations.
The second is a fact, it's in an interview:
http://portland.indymedia.org/media/media/2005/07/322343.wmv

Are the drill on 911 verified by news media or any credible source? And if so, what to think of this staggering coincidence?

[FoxOnTheRun]

It's not a coincidence

It's the way you confuse good people so the attack can happen

BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. , we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed to wards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.

08:43:06FOX: I've never seen so much real-world stuff happen during an exercise.

08:52:40
NASYPANY: Send 'em to New York City still. Continue! Go!
NASYPANY: This is what I got. Possible news that a 737 just hit the World Trade Center. This is a real-world. And we're trying to confirm this. Okay. Continue taking the fighters down to the New York City area, J.F.K. area, if you can. Make sure that the F.A.A. clears it— your route all the way through. Do what we gotta do, okay? Let's press with this. It looks like this guy could have hit the World Trade Center.

http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/060801fege01


There were 15 drills on 9/11 2001

Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Amalgam Virgo etc..

I don't remember all the names


You take as much aircraft away and send them to Iraq(No fly Zone), Alaska, Canada etc and you put false radar blimps of hijacked aircraft on the radar. Confusion is guaranteed.

[Shoestring]

2. What did "real-world" really mean?

The quote of Major James Fox saying, "I've never seen so much real-world stuff happen during an exercise" is really suspicious. I wonder if the staff at NEADS understood "real-world" to mean a live-fly field training exercise, as opposed to a purely simulated command post exercise?

So when Sgt. Jeremy Powell asked Boston flight control center "Is this real-world or exercise?" he could have been asking if the exercise was live-fly or not. And when Boston replied "this is not an exercise, not a test," he took it to mean that it was indeed a live-fly exercise, involving a plane under the control of the military pretending to be hijacked.

This would certainly explain the bizarre conversation between the NEADS "ID techs"—Stacia Rountree, Shelley Watson, and Maureen Dooley—when they heard of the reported hijacking:

8:37:56
WATSON: What?
DOOLEY: Whoa!
WATSON: What was that?
ROUNTREE: Is that real-world?
DOOLEY: Real-world hijack.
WATSON: Cool!

I find it hard to believe Shelley Watson would have responded, "Cool!" if she thought "Real-world hijack" did really mean a genuine hijacking. Might she instead have believed it to have meant a "live-fly," with a real plane pretending to be hijacked, for which they could launch fighers in response?

[Sven77]

1. Terror Drills are the cover

FalseFlagNews.com will be the main clearinghouse of terror drills, disaster drills, & military war games planned by the U.S. military with the aid of private military contractors.

Why monitor terror drills and war games?

Because rogue elements inside the military, not loyal to the Constitution, can use these drills as a cover for their synthetic, false-flag terror attacks which are later blamed on their stables of patsies, dupes, and double agents. Currently those patsies come in the form of the myth-drenched Al-Qaeda.

During the terror attacks of September 11, the U.S. military ran over 15 drills and war games. This was the highest concentration of military drills ever in one day.

http://www.falseflagnews.com/why_monitor_drills