|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:23 PM Original message |
Why is it considered so bad to suggest that Osama detonated the WTCs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Probably because it just didn't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. They know what failed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 07:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Here's some of the info on WTC 7 that I've been working on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. but terrorists do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fredda Weinberg
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. I guess you had to see it. 8 seconds? It was a lifetime to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. take the time and watch this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. it was 8 seconds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. That is actually wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 11:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. lol! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
50. How does failure at impact point refute cd? Planes could have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:27 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Do you honestly think that's a reasonable possibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:51 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Of course radio beacons in the buildings is a reasonable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. I think if you take out the center columns, which support the gravity load |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Your post indicates you may have a future in low-brow comedy work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 09:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
58. Actually, in WTC 1 the collapse did not start at the point of impact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. "Why is it considered so bad to suggest..." - Strawman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Wikipedia has a similar catch phrase for this technique |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. except that this isn't a conspiracy theory but a terrorist attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KFC
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. It is not so bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Probably because the controlled demo is a farce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Watch this .... connect the dots ...... that is all ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. the implication is Osama didn't do it--he was just the patsy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. because these dumb ideas make the rest of us look stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. that wasn't the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
51. Planes as window dressing makes plenty of sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. Demolition is only obvious if you listen to the tin-foilers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 12:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
45. Certainly more than you have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. Where does anyone present evidence that the critical temperatures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Thanks for making my point for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 12:31 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. You haven't read NIST, have you? Why not just admit that and quit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 01:25 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. You haven't read the report either, have you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:34 AM Response to Reply #47 |
62. Oh yeah, as I recall they said something like, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carefulplease
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. You don't recall well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
71. No, making stuff up as you go along sounds like this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:40 AM Response to Reply #44 |
54. You're making up your facts to support your complacency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. You have a lot of gall to say that about someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
34. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
53. "It pretty quickly becomes obvious " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. Among other problems is the fact that they were not detonated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. see post 7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
35. Popular Mechanics! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. Dungeon in 3 . . 2 . . 1. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm perfectly ok with the claim that planes brought the towers down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Ahummmm, 5 years later, the administrations official version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
37. terrorists can do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
75. They could do it. They were in pretty tight with the ISI, an intel org. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Terrorists can do sophisticated things too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yup, it's because it never happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You said 12,5 once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. The symbol ~ means "approximately" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I know the kean hamilton 911 commission conspiracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Then you'll know that it is convention to round .5 *up* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Yes you round up at 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
38. not conspiracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 04:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
55. "claims that these puffs of debris definitively mean squibs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poppyseedman
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
20. WTC and #7 were obviously denoted and brought down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. proved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. So that must mean that *all* of it has to be wrong?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 09:02 AM Response to Reply #42 |
57. No one says "Bush knew" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. That is actually wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Are you suggesting that I actually explain myself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Fri Sep-15-06 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
22. because it was the fbi in 1993 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
48. You mean by the CTists, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. Got proof that any terrorists have done so in the USA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:20 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Whew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. LEFT-wing OCTists? Unhuh. Sure thing. You couldn't refute, so you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Your post doesn't really make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Sounds like a personal problem. Hope you get better soon - before that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Do you feel that it is detrimental to the truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. We didn't have quizzes on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 09:42 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. That's unfortunate. No wonder OCT'ers have to resort to so many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Deleted message |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Hmmm - I'm confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Confused? That's not an acceptable excuse. But, I AM sorry to hear it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:15 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. So you DON'T have any evidence these tactics are being used? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:22 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. I don't claim to know all the details. It was an INSIDE job & the perps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. You seem to have trouble understanding my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 07:22 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Nice try, but you're wrong, rude, disrespectful, and should be ashamed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Another post that doesn't answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Sat Sep-16-06 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
63. It's bad because it's immoral to try to smear someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FoxOnTheRun
![]() |
Sun Sep-17-06 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
80. UBL said he had nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nozebro
![]() |
Wed Sep-20-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
85. This is the new limited hangout, right? EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC