Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PNAC Robert Kagan's piece talk on 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 04:56 AM
Original message
PNAC Robert Kagan's piece talk on 9/11
Sorry.
I'm awafully sorry.
Of course the title was ironic.
Robert Kagan and piece talk is a contradiction in itself.

But still it is simply amazing what this guy wrote on the day of9/11 itself!



September 11, 2001 - the date that will live in infamy, the day the post-Cold War era ended, the day the world for Americans changed utterly. In the coming days, as rescuers pick through the rubble in New York, in Washington, in Pittsburgh, and who knows where else across the besieged United States, as the bodies of thousands of dead Americans are uncovered, and as the rest of us weep over the destruction of innocent human life, our friends and loved ones, we may begin to hear analyses as to why this "tragedy" has befallen us. There will no doubt be questions raised, sins of omission and commission in the Middle East alluded to. Even today, the BBC opined that the attacks came because the United States had failed to get a "grip" on the Middle East. There is nothing strange or odd in that. After Pearl Harbor, almost exactly sixty years ago, there were those who argued, with perhaps even more persuasiveness, that then, too, the United States had somehow invited the Japanese attack. After all, had we not embargoed Japan's vital oil supply?

One can only hope that America can respond to today's monstrous attack on American soil - an attack far more awful than Pearl Harbor - with the same moral clarity and courage as our grandfathers did. Not by asking what we have done to bring on the wrath of inhuman murderers. Not by figuring out ways to reason with, or try to appease those who have spilled our blood. Not by engaging in an extended legal effort to find the killers and bring them to justice. But by doing the only thing we now can do: go to war. Over the last few years there has been a nostalgic celebration of "The Greatest Generation" - the generation that fought for America and for humanity in the Second World War. There's no need for nostalgia now. That challenge is before us again. The question today is whether this generation of Americans is made of the same stuff.

Please let us make no mistake this time: We are at war now. We have suffered the first, devastating strike. Certainly, it is not the last. The only question is whether we will now take this war seriously, as seriously as any war we have ever fought. Let's not be daunted by the mysterious and partially hidden identity of our attackers. It will soon become obvious that there are only a few terrorist organizations capable of carrying out such a massive and coordinated strike. We should pour the resources necessary into a global effort to hunt them down and capture or kill them. It will become apparent that those organizations could not have operated without the assistance of some governments, governments with a long record of hostility to the United States and an equally long record of support for terrorism. We should now immediately begin building up our conventional military forces to prepare for what will inevitably and rapidly escalate into confrontation and quite possibly war with one or more of those powers. Congress, in fact, should immediately declare war. It does not have to name a country. It can declare war against those who have carried out today's attack and against any nations that may have lent their support. A declaration of war would not be pure symbolism. It would be a sign of will and determination to see this conflict through to a satisfactory conclusion no matter how long it takes or how difficult the challenge.

Fortunately, with the Cold War over, there are no immediate threats around the world to prevent us from concentrating our energies and resources on fighting this war on international terrorism as we have never fought it before.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/kagan-091101.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medienanalyse Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, we must take the threat seriously
"A declaration of war would ... be a sign of will and determination to see this conflict through to a satisfactory conclusion..."

The relief is: the Congress does not what Kagan intends.

But the threar to incite another 9/11 has a meaning. PNAC is a PROJECT.

We must get rid of the conspiracy idiots and work on PNAC, identities, and especially the stand down of the interceptors more rapidly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medienanalyse Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the date is charming: 5 years ago
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 11:33 AM by medienanalyse
first I thought it to be a reminiscence to 9/11 written this year. It was of 9/11 itself - as if prewritten using the PNAC projects! Anyway: it still looks to be quite a present article - and that is not funny at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andre II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Quick
What a quick, intelligent and bright boy our Robert is.
His article was put online even before WTC 7 collapsed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/articles/kagan11.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC