|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sat Jan-06-07 10:56 PM Original message |
Actually thermit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. But wouldn't fire do the same thing?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. fire doesn't get hot enough, thermite burns at 2000c (3600F) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. What is the strength of steel at 600 c? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
86. Highest Temperature attained is irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. deleted dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Because the fire had to be intense in very specific places |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 07:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What specific places? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Exageration does not help your argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. Pathetic attempt to distract. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. yet factual! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Deal with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Dubious facts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. And praytell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You think steel evaporated as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Yes you really should read up before you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. You think the steel in the entire building needed to weaken to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. now you're just ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. With an open floor plan , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. An open floor plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Absolutely brilliant!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Absolutely Quickesst.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. You should patent that idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
63. Including the 40 million dollar airplane crash in your scheme.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Excuse me but you neglect the fact that WTC building # 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Thanks for helping make my point..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. You're right. Damage to WTC 7 caused it to collapse. But whoops! look at WTC 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Um, that's not what we were talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. WTC 3 didn't pancake collapse with severe structural damage and fires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. It was ALREADY collapsed from the impacts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. It was collapsed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #73 |
89. You forgot the fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. fire never... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Jan-10-07 05:50 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. left out the damage this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Jan-10-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. It's only a game to you I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Wed Jan-10-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. You did it AGAIN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin
![]() |
Wed Jan-10-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. But the NIST says it's still interested in determining why WTC 7 fell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #70 |
88. WTC 7 was not constructed like WTC 3 (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
87. Because it would be unsafe and unpredictable. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Fire indeed may do the same thing but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I think OCTers have created their own alternate reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. absolute bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. How do you know that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Fireproofing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
48. Would you please.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Does your reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You misunderstood what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
65. It's STUNNING that you would say that when a simple search reveals the truth.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #19 |
83. How about a reply to post 65. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. 600 degrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Again, how did kerosene that poured down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Kerosene was ignited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Indeed there are reports but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Survivors smelled kerosene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. only in your opinion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. It does when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. There are also many reports... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. are you talking ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Celsius and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. well let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Again, someone should patent this idea asap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Just add a fully fueled 757 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Except that the towers were designed to withstand impacts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. yes nebula... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Yes. of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. anything is...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Sun Jan-07-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Someone should have informed NIST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:03 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. you really don't have a clue do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. 'The jet-fuel ignited fires quickly spread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I was addressing Nebulas lame post about the fire sprinklers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. The WTC was a sprinklered building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #55 |
85. Worked out the kinks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. How can you say that .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. "Full of combustible material" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. The impact zones were occupied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Most of the space |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I laughed a little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. How could they be localized? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. The large billowing smoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
71. This is a picture of the towers from the WSW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. The Pentagon looked strikingly similar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
75. No raging fires you say? Look here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Deleted message |
nebula
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Again, the photo shows the fire is limited to the impact zone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Please site some evidence other than your totally ununformed opinion as to why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Do you have anything other than your petty insults and temper tantrums |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. NIST has no core steel samples showing heating above 250 C nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Doesn't matter.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Mon Jan-08-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. wtc 1,2,7 all collapsed due to fire and structural damage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piobair
![]() |
Tue Jan-09-07 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
84. "this science is amazing Sir Bedivere, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC