Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To those skeptical of controlled demolition on the grounds of conspicuous preparation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:51 PM
Original message
To those skeptical of controlled demolition on the grounds of conspicuous preparation.
It is argued that if WTC 1, 2, or 7 was being prepared for a controlled demolition, then people would have noticed that explosives would have been planted for weeks in advance. What they don't know is that every expert in homemade explosives knows that it could have been done with a potato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The South Tower said Potato, the North Tower said Potahto...
...and they both called the whole thing off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A potato.
Like you eat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Look, you were doing really well by producing the Kucinich chemtrail bill.
For the love of God, pull back now while you're ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. One potato?
Two potato? Three potato? Four?

Has Jim Hoffman done a calculation on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nasty, vicious tubers.
Thank whatever deity you believe in that you haven't seen a potato get a steel-structure building in its eyes. Oh, the horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. a big potato could topple the towers
A really, really big potato. ... Huge potato.

MIHOP = Mashed It Happen On Purpose?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. OF COURSE - it wasn't OBL .......
... it was this guy:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The true identity of Fat Osama! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wait, there may be something here.
http://foodmuseum.typepad.com/potato_museum_blog/2006/06/explosive_chips.html

Workers at a factory making chips were evacuated two days running last month after bomb parts turned up in potatoes imported from France and Belgium, the site of battles in World War One and Two. The Scarborough plant, owned by Canada’s McCain Foods, the world’s largest producer of frozen chips, was emptied on Friday after a worker spotted a shell tip among the potatoes as they were being cleaned for slicing. “The police were called and the bomb squad advised a 100 metre exclusion zone should be set up,” said a McCain spokesman.

An entire hand grenade was discovered in the potatoes and the Yorkshire plant was evacuated again. “The army took the device away and blew it up in a controlled explosion in a field nearby,” a spokeswoman for the North Yorkshire police said. The Scarborough plant was opened in 1969 and uses 1,400 tonnes of potatoes every week. Production is back to normal.

McCain’s Whittlesey plant near Peterborough has also been evacuated several times this year after World War Two ordnance was found in batches of potatoes. “Occasionally during the use of imported potatoes from Belgium and northern France, ordnance debris from the First and Second World War is found,” McCain said.


Hmm. I'm beginning to sense a theory here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. The sad thing is, that is a NIST argument
that they couldn't have had enough time for preparation, which is ridiculous. One of them said it in the meeting I posted about where they said there was "no evidence" for explosions (let's see, you could see them, you could hear them, dozens of people, including fire and policemen heard them, but there was no evidence). Bush science in action... It was so scripted and it was odd how similar it was to OCT statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. So you
agree it was a spud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. When did the NIST argue
that they couldn't have had enough time for preparation


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Hold on a second..
since no CTr has even advanced a detailed and coherent plan on how the WTC were laced with a combination of high explosives and thermite you cannot argue that there was enough time. Time enough for what?

How many explosives?
How many miles of detcord?
How many men?
How much time?

None of these questions have ever been answered and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sharp point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. "no CTr has even advanced a detailed and coherent plan"
They could have used a potato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Idaho? Russett? Where are the details? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. See my latest post with the detailed explanation:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Perhaps it was covert super spud guns that took out the towers
Heres the MOASG (Mother of all Spud Guns)



http://www.spudtech.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MervinFerd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Could you have one of those in orbit?
Death Spuds from Outer Space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why do you think Samwise Gamgee had to go underground?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC