Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Read slowly, compare to recent history. Ring any bells?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:00 AM
Original message
Read slowly, compare to recent history. Ring any bells?
Read slowly, compare to recent history. Ring any bells?

Helps provide a conceptual framework for asking specific questions

THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS AND
CONFLICT SHORT OF WAR
http://web.archive.org/web/20030101144227/www.datafilter.com/mc/rmaWarCollege.html


MELANCHOLY REUNION: A REPORT FROM THE FUTURE ON THE COLLAPSE OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
http://web.archive.org/web/20030210174404/www.usafa.af.mil/inss/ocp11.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. More proof that this has all been planned out well in advance.
But 2017 until civilian control of the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm...
"The fact that the United States has not faced a recent military or national security disaster has hindered the development and application of new technology to conflict short of war".

Well, maybe a "catastrophic" and "Pearl Harbor like" event would do the trick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Lone Groover Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Strewth!
Hindered... fucking hindered!!!!

You'd think they'd be happy about not having recent military or national security disasters.

But oh no...

Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure does jog my memory slad.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No doubt!
:)
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Directed energy weapons !?!
I'm not into the deep CT stuff I found this interesting (from the first link):

"American values also make the use of directed energy weapons against suspected narcotrafficking aircraft technologically feasible but morally difficult, perhaps unacceptable. The advantage of directed energy weapons over conventional ones is deniability".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, all that stuff is out there and they are keeping it hidden.
Edited on Sun Mar-11-07 01:55 AM by Contrite
No doubt. And people wonder why others like myself think those towers were taken out by a new type of nuclear weapon or even by directed energy beams. The possibilities are endless, because we are totally in the dark. And that scares the shit out of me. The fact that they are "weaponizing" space means we are indeed heading toward a true "prison planet" (nod to Alex Jones).

I just watched a retired major general (Paul Eaton) on Bill Maher's show from last night who was plainly pinning blame for what went wrong on civilians in the administration. From other things I have read, in the main articles by Seymour Hersh, the military seems to be staging some sort of a coup using that as an excuse. Military rule? Martial law? Coming to a town near you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Firstly-there are operational and prototype directed energy weapons
worldwide. This isn't theoretical, it is a reality.

Cheryl Welsh is a UN recognized expert and an activist against weapons that target the human central nervous system, she has international connections with other experts and has done much to educate people about the development of these weapons.

Here's a link to her website
http://www.mindjustice.org/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC