OCTists, why has there been no major terrorist attack on the US since 911?

[whatchamacallit]

Poll question: OCTists, why has there been no major terrorist attack on the US since 911?

I'm very curious why you think this is

[AZCat]

1. Your poll answers don't make sense.

You might need to go back and edit them.

[whatchamacallit]

2. weird, "preview post" truncated my choice fields

:shrug:

[AZCat]

3. That is weird. But now they make sense.

I will vote.

[hack89]

4. How about choice "D"

increased international police and intelligence sharing? Take some time to research the European response to 911 - very revealing and very effective.

It doesn't have to be America all the time every time you know.

[whatchamacallit]

5. You mean all those high-profile-terror-plots thwarted by european authorities

where later you learn from page 13 of the paper that most of the suspects were released for lack of evidence?

[hack89]

6. Ok - you win. nt

[whatchamacallit]

7. So that's it?

5 votes (2 for Bush's WOT), and a vague, half-hearted, attempt to claim maybe the europeans saved us? I figured this would be difficult for the OCT to ponder, but...

[Make7]

8. And after such an honest attempt at a productive discussion.... ( n/t )

[LARED]

9. You have obviously pondered this deeply and for a long time

so why has there been no additional attacks?

[whatchamacallit]

10. Of the three simple possibilities in the poll, I gotta go with #3 (n/t)

[Bolo Boffin]

11. So that's what the weasel words of "real perps" means

You can chortle to yourself that you're getting OCTists to agree with the "new Pearl Harbor" theory. So this thread is nothing but game playing and flamebait.

[LARED]

12. So that's it?

A meaningless response to meaningless poll.

Go figure.

[noise]

13. It's an excellent question

regardless of one's view on 9/11.

Black op/false flag view: They could have capitalized on the fearmongering and further stifled dissent.

OCT view: The Bush administration tactics inflamed terrorist groups. They also failed to implement logical CT measures (some of which were finally passed by way of the Improving Americas Security Act of 2007). These factors make it difficult to understand the lack of follow up attacks.

[mrgerbik]

14. you need a 4th choice

major incompetence on the part of our government went a long way in beefing up security.

Never underestimate the power of incompetence.

[jberryhill]

15. Two reasons:

1. They succeeded in their purpose of drawing the US military into a protracted engagement in Afghanistan.

2. It's not as if that type of thing is on "off the shelf" project that can be put together on short notice. Preparation for the 9/11 attacks required patient long-term effort, and IMHO it doesn't seem as if they were engaged in a number of parallel efforts to pull of a number of such attacks in short succession.