Rodney Stich-- Corruption Whistleblower and his take on 9/11

[spooked911]

Stich has an amazing life story as a pilot, FAA investigator and whistleblower on corruption in America. He's written several books on what he's learned over the years. I've been reading Stich's book "Defrauding America" (2nd edition), which details how he tried to blow the whistle on corruption at the FAA and United Airlines for many years, then got entangled in the legal system and was jailed for some time. I haven't finished the book, but his story on corruption in the legal system is very striking.

He has some extensive writings on 9/11 here, if anyone wants to check it out:
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/

His take on 9/11 seems to be that the hijackings were real, and were facilitated by corruption in the FAA, the airlines and the CIA.

This is more for people who are interested in a more "believable" and "mainstream" 9/11 conspiracy. I think Stich's story is only part of the whole plot, but his views are still worth noting, especially on how the courts and federal judges can be part of a cover-up.

[LARED]

1. When you say "facilitated " .......

do you mean the bureaucratic bumblings, incompetence, and corruption of the FAA prevented changes that would have hindered 9/11, or do you mean the FAA facilitated 9/11 meaning it was part of a MIHOP or LIHOP scenario?

[vincent_vega_lives]

2. I have no issues with Mr Stich

September 11, 2001, the day that a record number of airline disasters occurred. The conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners, when the plans were known for weeks, and the steps to prevent hijackings were known and easily put into place. The nearly 3,000 direct deaths were ripple effects, sometimes called the Butterfly Effect, from years of corruption of certain key people in the FAA and the endemic cover-ups of which marks the deep-seated culture in the United States.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/faa_index.html

He's a LIHTCI kind of guy (Let It Happen Through Criminal Incompitence).

I have issues with you though.

[rschop]

3. RE: The nearly 3,000 direct deaths....and the endemic cover-ups

From prior post:

He's a LIHTCI kind of guy (Let It Happen Through Criminal Incompetence).

There is now abundant proof that the CIA working with FBI HQ agents and managers "Let It Happen Through Criminal" actions, not incometence, they took to shut down all FBI criminal investigations of al Qaeda terrorists who were known not only to be inside of the US but were known to be taking part in a massive al Qaeda attack that would kill thousands of Americans. Since this information is now so widely known, the question is where has Mr. Stich been not to be familiar with this information?

[spooked911]

4. why is it so very hard to believe they let it happen because of nefarious reasons?

Really, after all that has come out about these people, their torture and lies, etc, is it so hard to believe that is was more than an accident because of "incompetence"?

[AZCat]

5. You mean other than a lack of evidence or a rational explanation?

No reason, I guess.

[spooked911]

6. there is, in fact, plenty of both

Still Here Ignoring Like Luddites?

[rschop]

7. RE: You mean other than a lack of evidence or a rational explanation?

There is now a massive amount of evidence which leads to a rational explanation of why the attacks on 9/11 were allowed to take place by the CIA and FBI HQ agents and managers when they had more than enough information to prevent these attacks. I can site you chapter and verse, even the exact page numbers from the exact US government documents that back all of this up.

[defendandprotect]

8. Obviously, you agree one way or another "inside job" . . .

however, I think the Pentagon is the perfect example of where to begin looking for a plane

and difficult to find one!

We have a reporter who was covering the area of the Pentagon for CNN telling us quite clearly

and confidently -- no plane.

We have a taxi driver indicating the alleged incident on the highway/fallen telephone poles ...

was a set up he didn't want to be involved with.

We have witnesses who identify a different route for the "plane" and it ends up looking like a

flyover.

We have woman -- believe the woman who is suing now -- who was sitting behind the area where

the "plane" supposedly hit/entered! She's specifically suing because Pentgagon issued no

warning of "incoming." We have Minetta's testimony that "incoming" was being reported to

Cheney at various intervals -- from 50 miles out.

We have a 20X15 foot hole -- presumably made by a "bunker buster" -- which the plane which

was 44 feet high and much, much wider could not have made it thru without leaving most of itself

OUTSIDE on the ground.

We have the Pentagon offering a film of NO PLANE --

and now supplying Citgo and hotel film of NO PLANE --

And, those who should know say that the Pentagon had an anti-missile system --

and we presume that was turned off. Just a slow day in DC with four boring simulated

programs being run. Why bother putting on your anti-missile system?*

Once the Pentagon plane is gone -- and it's disappearing faster than ice on a hot summer's day --

then there is no reason to think that any planes were hijacked.



* OTOH, Bush stayed at a hotel in Florida the night before where his security installed
anti-missile system on the rooftop.
Guess Pentagon just didn't think of that?

[SDuderstadt]

9. Of course, D&P is talking about Jamie McIntyre here...

We have a reporter who was covering the area of the Pentagon for CNN telling us quite clearly
and confidently -- no plane.

Of course, McIntyre flatly contradicts her claim:

http://www.911myths.com/html/jamie_mcintyre_and_the_pentago.html