|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 10:00 AM Original message |
Many here feel the Towers fell from implosion |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HannibalCards
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. The answer to your question is Nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. excuse me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Do you have any clue just how many tons of high explosive you are talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. what witnesses are those? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HannibalCards
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Sure did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Here is a WTC dust analysis - show me all the steel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. The dustification was needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. What makes you think the dust consists of the steel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Ohio Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. If you put them on ignore simply because they don't agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 04:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I do not think ALL the dust is from steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Jesus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
116. Which begs another question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:41 AM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Send me a picture.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:45 AM Response to Reply #117 |
119. I was begging the question of the hole you referenced... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. And I was asking for your picture.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:59 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Too Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:13 AM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Slow down.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:23 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. You do serve a purpose here afer all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #123 |
124. I'll bet you say that to all the boys.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:29 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. If you only knew... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:34 AM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Well, you DO talk in your sleep....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:38 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Actually I do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:46 AM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Who cares if we're off-topic..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:51 AM Response to Reply #128 |
129. hmm I think I would treat them the same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:58 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Okay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 04:04 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Yeah... I am too demanding.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 04:05 AM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Alright...that does it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #129 |
136. What do you think about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 11:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KDLarsen
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. What perspective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 01:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KDLarsen
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Looking at the last picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #24 |
57. Bottom line... I have no answer for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I pretty much agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. What kind of weapon can get past the Easter Bunny's defenses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. As long as we are discussing questions with no basis in reality... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Oh, bruddah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #74 |
91. Yeah, too real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. When is your next "vacation", dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Deleted message |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 02:44 AM Response to Reply #14 |
118. Easy or not so easy answer to your question.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #118 |
135. 200,000 tons of steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #118 |
141. Although he is talking about Scrap Metal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Neily
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #141 |
147. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Mist
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
79. It seems to me that simply falling down wouldn't have caused materials such as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. That's because it didn't "simply fall down"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Sat Oct-31-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. What I would start with is this. What evidence leads you to conclude that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 04:35 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Evidence: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HannibalCards
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 05:27 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You are looking right at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Exactly. I'm looking at a field of ashes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. you are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I am. That is exactly what I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Neither is the religious beliefs of 1 random individual such as yourself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. "There is some steel in the pile of course" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
59. I'm not sure what you expect to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. um |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WillowTree
![]() |
Sun Nov-29-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #73 |
153. All the "evidence" you ought to need is right there in the photo in post #23. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
81. The problem is that the subbasements didn't collapse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Oversize photo showing the WTC debris: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #81 |
139. subbasement pic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #59 |
140. had collapsed into the sub basements. - FEMA photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ryan_cats
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 10:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
156. Why would the cheese graters be radioactive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #156 |
159. There is a small but fierce contingent of "truthers" that firmly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ryan_cats
![]() |
Wed Dec-02-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #159 |
163. Nuked, huh, well ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Dec-02-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #163 |
167. Why are you trying to "suppress the truth".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Nov-04-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
148. I see the problem now. You have no evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Wed Nov-04-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #148 |
150. incidentally, I really love the title of the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Thu Nov-05-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Absolutely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thepeopleunited
![]() |
Wed Nov-04-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #148 |
151. What problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
waldenaut
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. I believe it is likely due to the use of explosive nuclear devices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
111. A Conservative yield - - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Nov-04-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #111 |
149. "As far as I know the evidence doesn't really point to nukes. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
29. And what happened to the office contents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. You know, it's real embarrassing that thinking as... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. You sound very angry and bitter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 07:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Really, dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. It's amazing these theories continue to get recycled - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. It's actually embarrassing...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. filing cabinet found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Jesus, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Falling buildings cause filing cabinets to melt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Jesus, dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. 'dude logic' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 11:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. You still think the towers pancaked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sun Nov-01-09 11:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Why do you still cling to the pancaking fantasy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:00 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. You really should stick to your Pink Panther and Jetsons reruns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Ouch, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:53 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. NIST only dropped pancaking as a theory of collapse initiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:13 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Have you been drinking the SD kool-aid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Where does it say anything about collapse initiation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:39 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Jesus fucking christ, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:56 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Are you hallucinating again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Dude....this is what I'm talking about.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:27 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Saying it doesn't make it so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. For the last fucking time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
76. You still haven't shown where NIST says the floors pancaked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Dude...how many fucking times do I have t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 03:47 AM Response to Reply #48 |
55. They are clearly talking about collapse initiation there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
75. Utter fantasy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. Okay, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. You spout plenty of mumbo jumbo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. massive fail n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:40 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. I fail to understand the mumbo jumbo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. More stalling from RollingRock..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Where's your math, dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 08:15 AM Response to Reply #94 |
134. Well, you don't always want to use Darcy-Weisbach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #75 |
95. At least you are labeling your posts correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. 'NIST won't ever deny that.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 06:41 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. No, they did not. "Collapse" for NIST is collapse initiation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Your imagination running wild again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. I'm curious what you think this means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. Now I've provided the exact quote where NIST is shown to be talking about initiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. dontcha know, context is part of the conspiracy!!1! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Deleted message |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Your arrogance is astonishing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Where does it say pancaking takes place after initiation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. What does it say, rollingrock? What's that verb? INITIATED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:50 PM Response to Reply #107 |
112. The sad thing is, you don't even know what pancaking is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. NIST: "the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:28 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. Okay, dude...this one is your record doozy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. Can you read, dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. So where do they say pancaking was the RESULT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 11:22 PM Response to Reply #108 |
114. I tried to translate the following into braille so you could read it, but it didn't work, dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 07:41 AM Response to Reply #114 |
133. surely you didn't mean Braille |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:34 AM Response to Reply #133 |
138. It was a two-fold spoof of RR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #114 |
143. Are you a special needs student? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Where's your math, dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ryan_cats
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #40 |
157. Rust is not an issue here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Prometheus Bound
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
160. Holy crap! The Dude Pancake Theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
60. crushed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
77. No, it is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vincent_vega_lives
![]() |
Tue Dec-01-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #77 |
161. Yes it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Tue Dec-01-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #77 |
162. Still pimping your little quotemined soundbite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Theobald
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
62. I feel like chicken tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Well, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. It's wallboard, concrete and other materials found in offices, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. you mean, "steel looking like it turned to dust"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. I see an ignored!! Too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. You just responded to yourself, dude.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Theobald
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
71. there is a vast difference between saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. There is evidence of steel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Theobald
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #72 |
88. You claim that there is steel dust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #88 |
96. sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. If you have nearly everyone on ignore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Mon Nov-02-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #71 |
87. Two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Theobald
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #87 |
144. It appears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #63 |
137. Deleted message |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #137 |
142. Do collapsed buildings have big craters in the bottom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Tue Nov-03-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. There are a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ryan_cats
![]() |
Sun Nov-29-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
154. How many clunkities is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 06:47 AM Response to Reply #154 |
155. Finally someone that makes sense. I'm going to the dark side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Mon Nov-30-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #155 |
158. You already are on the dark side. You just don't realize it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ryan_cats
![]() |
Wed Dec-02-09 10:44 AM Response to Reply #155 |
164. Does someone know the units? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Wed Dec-02-09 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
165. dustification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Dec-02-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #165 |
166. All I know is, when I encounter "dustification".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri May 09th 2025, 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC