|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
rollingrock
![]() |
Thu Dec-03-09 06:28 PM Original message |
FBI veteran/whistleblower: 'There has to be a new investigation of 9/11' |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Former FBI chief Ted Gunderson says 9/11 was inside job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ted Gunderson was never the "chief" of the FBI, RollingRock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Subdivisions
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Ted Gunderson is the former FBI Division CHIEF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Which is why the clueless are better left ignored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Dec-06-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Second that one . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Dec-06-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Two points.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Subdivisions
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Why are you still talking about this "chief" stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 01:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Because you guys can't get basic facts right.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Subdivisions
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 02:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Ok, so what does that have to do with what the former FBI division chief has to say? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. How many divisional chiefs are there and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Subdivisions
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. So what about what Gunderson has to say? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. When he can actually document it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-17-09 05:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Deleted message |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Interesting - rollingrock was factually inaccurate, SDuderstadt points this out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 07:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Are you claiming he was not an FBI division chief? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. "FBI chief: Bomber's release 'a mockery'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Move on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The semantic games were started by you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
CrunchMaster
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. FBI helped cause 9/11 by sitting on their hands and doing nothing to stop it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. CNN was using the term "chief" loosely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It's common enough to call the FBI director the "FBI chief" that division chiefs need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 08:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. To avoid confusion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Dec-06-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. What bullshit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Dec-06-09 12:19 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. If you'd write clearly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Dec-06-09 12:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. This reminds me of when FL SOS Katherine Harris,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
CrunchMaster
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Gunderson is just another dirty spook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Are you on crack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
chandler2
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. Thanks. His explanation about the Anti-Terrorism Act is very... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored
![]() |
Sat Dec-05-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
15. If Coleen Rowley read DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
27. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. Please don't associate Coleen Rowley with Ted Gunderson ever again. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Dec-07-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I TOLD you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Wed Dec-09-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. What has Gunderson said about 9/11 that isn't true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Dec-09-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Quit trying to shift the burden of proof... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
chandler2
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. "Gunderson is an opportunist who will say anything to gain the attention of his niche market." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
netsurfer2
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
35. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Huh? The thread is about Coleen Rowly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
chandler2
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
38. The comments section makes THIS forum seem mild, by comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Yeah, Rowley is a major whistleblower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
chandler2
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 09:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Thanks for the welcome. The point I was trying to make had... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rollingrock
![]() |
Sat Dec-19-09 09:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. They seem to be unmoderated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri May 09th 2025, 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC