job. The blogger's name is KIRILL VLADIMOROVICH POKROVSKY aka Dr Keyreal. (FYI What is wierd is that there were, as of one week ago four parts to his 911 posts. I can now only pull up Part I and II from cache. Part I is a discussion of PNAC so I haven't included it but what is regretable is that in either Part III or IV there is an indepth commentary about the hijackers and their movements that day.)
But moving right along.
Even though he covers alot of the same info availalble elsewhere
Pokrovsky excels at highlighting some pertinent issues and facts that seem to get lost in the discussion. For instance, the fact that the air force never intercepted the planes. Pokrovsky brings attention to "a bizarre memorandum (entitled “Aircraft Piracy and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects”) that Cheney rammed through the Defense Department on June 1, 2001, exactly three months before 9/11...Cheney inexplicably relieves NORAD of its long-standing responsibility to intercept and shoot down hijacked airplanes that pose a major threat on the ground."
I fully agree with Pokrovsky that this memorandum is bizarre but I don't see it discussed on DU. Has it been explained satisfactorily?
He goes on to write,
snip
In other words, the U.S. generals had their hands tied on 9/11, and could not even scramble jets without a direct order from the Pentagon. That command, of course, never came.
It should be no surprise as to who failed to pick up the telephone at the Pentagon on the morning of Sept. 11. Yes, Donald Rumsfeld. Where was he? Strangely, nobody could find him. Indeed, the official 9/11 Commission report states that the Defense Secretary
“was untraceable until 10:30a.m.” Eventually, US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was caught on film shortly after the crash of Flight 77, assisting with the rescue efforts on the lawn of the Pentagon. Although this humanly gesture must be commended, it seems to be completely at odds with Rumsfeld’s most critical job duty, which was to give clearance for NORAD to shoot down or intercept hijacked aircraft according to Cheney’s updated (and short-lived) memorandum mentioned above.
On the lawn of the Pentagon, tending to the wounded was not the right place for the Defense Secretary who should have been sitting near the phone, coordinating our national defenses. And how did Rumsfeld know for certain that another plane might not drop out of the sky, indeed as had been wildly rumored? Wouldn’t his expertise and command have been much more helpful inside of the Pentagon?"
So my question to dungeon dwellers is whether Rumsfeld's whereabouts until 10:30 am ever been resolved?
With regards to the absence of video from the Pentagon he refers to the the extremely odd fact that the investigator was not allowed to see all the tapes. IMO this is another significant detail that doesn't get the amount of attention it deserves.
snip
According to an affidavit by Jacqueline Maguire, Special Agent Counter terrorism Division of the FBI, “fifty-six (56) of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.”
Maguire goes on to explain that “I personally viewed the remaining twenty-nine (29) videotapes.” Yet she concluded that there was “nothing of interest” for the public to gain from having access to those tapes.
Again, we are reduced to asking more silly “why” questions, which should have been provided from the beginning: If the Pentagon perimeter was ringed with security cameras, why were approximately three-fourths of the devices not aimed at the building itself? And if they were aimed away from the complex, as alleged, how could a Boeing 757-200 commercial jet fail to get captured by all of the video cameras? Finally, why did Maguire “personally view” just 29 of the available 85 tapes? {b}Why did she not have privilege to all of them? Certainly she must have been curious. And if it was not Maguire who viewed the other 56 tapes, who did view them?
Anyway these are just snippets from his 911 posts. As stated above, I had pulled them up a week ago but are no longer available so the the link below is from cache.
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:2LLjty84r10J:kirillpokrovsky.blogspot.com/2009/09/911-reasons-why-911-was-probably-inside_1971.html+dr+keyreal+911+part+1&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&lr=lang_en