Explain the white bright flash areas...please..

[demodewd]

How does one explain the two bright white flash areas of alleged Flight 175 just prior to its hitting WTC2? If it was the sun's reflection,wouldn't the brightened area span the entire fuselage?

Could these bright white flashes be indicative of the firing of a missile?

[slutticus]

1. That's clearly a U.F.O.

But seriously, why would someone fire a missile from a plane if the plane is going to hit the target anyway? Seriously...just think about it.

[demodewd]

2. re"seriously"

But seriously, why would someone fire a missile from a plane if the plane is going to hit the target anyway? Seriously...just think about it.

One explanation..the perpetrators wanted to insure that the plane would be entirely disintegrated before it exited the building and to create a hole to accomodate the plane's entry.

You didn't explain the odd phenomenon. Why the sudden white flashes that were not there a nanosecond beforehand and only appear just prior to the plane's entry?

[Abe Linkman]

5. Another question, demodewd.

Why would the perps want the plane to be entirely disintegrated before it exited the building? I'm not disagreeing, rather, I'm merely asking for your opinion. Not a passenger plane? No one on board, so no blood or body parts (MUSH) would be found if the plane was found relatively intact? Fear of disovery of retrofitted apendages? _____?

[demodewd]

8. exactly

Exactly. No evidence that it was a 767 cargo plane instead of Flight 175.

[MercutioATC]

16. Wouldn't a pre-made hole in the building DECREASE damage to the plane??

Wouldn't that contradict what you just claimed?

[slutticus]

7. You don't need to create a hole to "accommodate" a jetliner traveling at..

...400 mph. The exterior of the WTC was the weakest part of the building.


And when one tries to explain an unknown phenomena, the simplest explanation is usually the best. Launching missiles just doesn't make any sense. I just don't see a need for it. There was enough energy present in just the plane itself for complete destruction of the aircraft.


Edited: bad spelling

[demodewd]

9. I understand...but..

I understand your logic except that you haven't explained the flash phenomenon. If there was a plane substitution,the perps would absolutely want the event to go off perfectly...leaving no trace of the substituted plane.

[slutticus]

11. I'm not trying to explain the flash.

I'm just saying that a missile theory makes no sense. It looks like a reflection to me.

Why doesn't the flash increase in length to the rear? It seems to keep the same position for the last 4 frames. If both the plane and the missile are moving, the trail should extend back wards in each frame, but it doesn't.

Also, how do you explain the fact that the right wing and right tail wing get brighter in the last 2 frames. My vote is reflection.

[demodewd]

15. contained area

Do you believe it was Flight 175 piloted by Arab hijackers?

Why would there be such a sudden flash on the plane when there was no indication of a "reflection" on clips prior to those that show the flash.How can a plane change its angle to the sun so radically in a nanosecond? And it is also my understanding that the plane in its last split seconds was flying in shadowed area.

Perhaps the flash(exhaust?)was contained in a missile firing silo(piping)?

[slutticus]

19. Artifacts.

I was reviewing the animated gif, and there are also some strange artifacts in frames 4 and 6 that I just noticed. They also look like bright flashes. Maybe orbital missile strikes?

[demodewd]

21. hmmmm

I think you're right. Probably originating from the Chinese mafia.

[Abe Linkman]

3. Demodewd: Certainly seems reasonable, but may I ask you a question?

What do you think explains the fact that there appear to be two discrete flashes? Does that mean TWO missiles, or ____?

[demodewd]

6. Abe..

The flash initiates from the front area of the fuselage. I believe that what we see is the heat from the exhaust. The apparatus(pod) interupts the flash. I would guess that the piping enclosure runs under the pod. Thus the separate sections? One missile I believe...but who knows maybe there was a succession of missiles?

[Abe Linkman]

12. Ah, so. I see now, and I agree with your analysis. Thanks. n/t

n/t

[Old and In the Way]

4. That's the only plane that we have definitive video proof of crashing.

Looks real to me....I don't think it was a missle launch. No point.

[demodewd]

10. less than a second

How do you explain the sudden flash areas? You're talking a maybe less than a second from the start to the finish of the flash clip.

[Old and In the Way]

13. Well, I'm biased todays artifct, lighting, etc.

A 757 isn't equipped for missle launches. Here's the point. If you were going to based your whole "caveman" theory on the taped evidence, why would introduce a variable of missle launches into this? To great a risk.

Beside's, missles have exhaust trails trails. I don't see any.

[demodewd]

17. obviously...

Obviously a commercial jet plane isn't equipped for missile launches. But this wasn't a commercial jet plane. It was a military cargo plane retrofitted . What you see is the exhaust trail of the ejected missile incapsulated in a retrofitted silo or piping ...or I shall say that is what I think you see. I'm always open for alternative explanations.

The greater risk would be for the public to find out that Flight 175 was not the plane that crashed into WTC2. Thus the need to absolutely disintegrate the plane before it had a chance to exit the building before exploding and falling below where it would have been very difficult to hide all the incriminating evidence.

[pleiku52cab]

14. Reflections off windows as plane

banks slightly right and toward the morning sun.

[demodewd]

18. radical banking

That's some radical banking in about one tenth of a second!

[pleiku52cab]

20. SO? He didnt care about that

He only had to make sure of hitting the building

[demodewd]

22. length of "reflection"

If it was window reflections,why isn't the whitened area extended farther back on the fuselage? If it is a reflection on the aluminum surface,why isn't it reflecting across the entire side of the fuselage?

[unpossibles]

23. hmm

while I do not buy the official story at all, I don't think there was a substitute plane, and am not sure about the Pentagon one either.

First of all, I know a couple of people who were on those planes - if they were not killed on board, where are they? It looks like a reflection to me - perhaps why it doesn't go the length of the plane is because the body is curved, not straight. It could also be a reflection of a reflection from a building.

I am not saying you are wrong, or that the government is not lying to us about this, but I do not see why they would use missiles and a plane.

[demodewd]

24. In politics....

"In politics nothing is accidental. If something happens, be assured it was planned this way." - Fra :D