Has anyone seen the note left by RFK's killer prior to the assassination?

[angelicwoman]

Why did he repeat the same sentences over and over?
The note was written about 3 weeks before the hit.

[jberryhill]

1. Why?

Being crazy helps.

[jschurchin]

2. How do you know he was nut's?

Is every accused assassin a whack job? Was Sirhan Sirhan in the pantry that night? Yep, he sure was. Did he fire a gun? Yep, he did. Did he fire the fatal bullet into the back of Bobby Kennedy's head? No. He did not. He never got closer then 4 feet away from Bobby, and never did get behind him. And according to Dr. Thomas Noguchi

Noguchi stated that the shot that killed RFK "had entered through the mastoid bone, an inch behind the right ear and had traveled upward to sever the branches of the superior cerebral artery."

Now break out your Gray's Anatomy and do a little research to find out where on the human head this is. And on top of this, Dr. Noguchi also said

"Until more is precisely known...the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy."

Sirhan may have been nut's, but I really don't think so, but he DID NOT fire the fatal bullet into Bobby Kennedy's head.

[SDuderstadt]

3. Of course...

someone else did, but no one saw them.

Get real.

P.S. Why do you keep spelling "nuts" with an apostrophe?

[jschurchin]

4. Here's what I see.

Replies to this thread
Why? jberryhill Mar-02-10 09:23 PM #1
How do you know he was nut's? jschurchin Mar-03-10 10:27 AM #2
Ignored Ignored Mar-03-10 10:43 AM #3

[SDuderstadt]

8. I am proud to be...

ignored by CT's, however, how can there be a debate when most CT's put skeptics who ask them hard questions on "ignore"?

[jberryhill]

6. You saw the note, yes?

Your mileage may vary, but I do not often receive correspondence having the general appearance of that note.

The specific question was why would someone write the same sentence over and over.

The specific question was why would someone write the same sentence over and over.

The specific question was why would someone write the same sentence over and over.

The specific question was why would someone write the same sentence over and over.

The specific question was why would someone write the same sentence over and over.

Perhaps you need a different set of pen pals.

That and the fact that his defense was premised on diminished capacity leads me to think that perhaps he was not quite right in the head.

As you seem to agree that he was involved in the shooting in some way, at least, that also leads me to conclude that shooting someone in a hotel ballroom other than in self defense might just not be the best indicator of proper mental hygiene.

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[OnTheOtherHand]

7. there's a big gap between you and Noguchi

Noguchi: "the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility."

You: "Sirhan... DID NOT fire the fatal bullet into Bobby Kennedy's head."

What is the basis for your disagreement with Noguchi?

[jschurchin]

9. I'm not a elected official.

Same cannot be said for the L.A. County coroner. Please do not snip my posts, if you want to post his entire quote, feel free. He said:"Until more is precisely known...the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility.Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy."
You seem to have forgotten that part of his quote. Oh wait, I'm sorry, that part doesn't fit your notion of what happened that night.
Carry on.

[MinM]

5. Thane Eugene Caesar

YouTube - RFK Assassination: Multiple Shooters

did not write that. Here's a picture of Caesar's...

clip-on tie ^^^ . RFK managed to pull it off his killer, Thane Eugene Caesar, as he fell.


RFK Signing Poster In Pantry - The Education Forum

http://www.ctka.net/rfkarticles.html

[jschurchin]

11. Don't go there MinM

Caesar passed a lie detector test. They asked him "Did you shoot anyone on June 5th 1968?" and he answered "No" which they determined to be a truthful statement.

Kennedy was shot at approximately 12:30 a.m. on June 6th. The examiner never did ask him if he shot anyone on June 6th.

[Happy Friend]

12. Polygraph

Caesar's supposedly passing a polygraph means little anyway. In fact, one of the more infuriating aspects of the RFK assassination "investigation" is how the police had all these people take polygraph tests. The people who spoke about Sirhan with the "Walking Bible" guy or all failed. The the problem is that polygraph tests are never foolproof first of all. More importantly, to the extent that they are accurate, their accuracy depends on the skill and honesty of the operator.

The guy running the polygraph tests for the RFK investigation was not just a cop; he also worked for the CIA.

The only real investigation into the assassination was done by Turner and Christian. The wrote a book about it called The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy: Conspiracy and Coverup. It is a very disturbing book. I never knew the details of the case before I read it.

There was a witness who saw Thane shooting and hitting RFK. There was no witness who saw Sirhan in a position to deliver the point blank shot to the back of the head that killed him. There are photographs of more bullet holes than Sirhan's gun could hold. Evidence has been destroyed or tampered with. After losing a lawsuit, the LAPD even had to pay a kid around $300,000 for confiscating and destroying his photographs of the scene. Key witnesses got harassed and shot shot at in situations that could not have been random violence.

Sirhan was hypnotized. Those notebooks give it away. They were clearly not written by a person sane enough to be a functional political assassin. A clue in his writings eventually led the Christian and Turner to suspect one prominent hypnotist who they later found out bragged to these girls about working for the CIA and hypnotizing Sirhan.

The hypnosis stuff sounds crazy, but the CIA did do mind control experiments with hypnosis and drugs. That would explain why to this day Sirhan does not remember the event.

Public anger around LA was widespread. In one election, a candidate for DA ran on platform that included doing a real investigation into RFK's murder. He barely lost even though he had the all of the political establishment working against him.

I can't remember that brave lawyer's name though... Who was that guy?

[Happy Friend]

13. Also...

What does this have to do with 9/11 ?

[jschurchin]

14. It has nothing to do with 9-11.

However Skinner and EarlG have set up this forum for all the different events that have questions attached to them, from 9-11 to JFK to RFK etc.
Have fun here, don't let people get under your skin, remember ignore is your friend and welcome to the forum.

Oh yeah, P.S. The Turner and Christian book was very enlightening.

[Happy Friend]

15. Oh..

Why not file it under "Conspiracy Theory" ?

It's like creating a category called "Baseball" and making people post about all sports in that category.

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[defendandprotect]

17. Hypnotized . . . and/or Howard Hunt wrote the journal . . .

[Happy Friend]

18. Strange Order

When a nationally renowned hypnotist was visiting Sirhan, he determined that Sirhan had been hypnoprogrammed. He had developed a good connection with Sirhan and was confident he could deprogram him and learn who had originally programmed him. Unfortunately the prison officials intervened and forced him to cease and desist.

There really is not innocent explanation of that.