Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Flight 93 Contradiction -- human cremation without burning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:44 AM
Original message
Another Flight 93 Contradiction -- human cremation without burning
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A56110-2002May8
As coroner, responsible for returning human remains, Miller has been forced to share with the families information that is unimaginable. As he clinically recounts to them, holding back very few details, the 33 passengers, seven crew and four hijackers together weighed roughly 7,000 pounds. They were essentially cremated together upon impact. Hundreds of searchers who climbed the hemlocks and combed the woods for weeks were able to find about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totaling less than 600 pounds, or about 8 percent of the total.

http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Sep2006/Feature2.asp
The plane “went in the ground so fast it didn’t have a chance to burn,” says Jim.



Cremation without burning-- another flight 93 contradiction, and another 9/11 first.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yay! More cherry picked quotes!
Man... You missed one though:

"Jim points to a grove of hemlocks behind the field and explains that the impact “burned about an acre of those trees.” From this proximity, it’s obvious that the lower parts of the trees in front are charred."

And who the heck is this Jim anyway? Why he is Jim Svonavec. Where was Jim on 9/11? Lets see here... ah, another thing omitted:

"Sally explains that she and Jim were in Hilton Head, South Carolina, on September 11, 2001, just beginning an overdue vacation."

So... Why would Jim's word mean anything? oop's... more omitted info:

"Because of their familiarity with the property, the Svonavecs were asked to work with the F.B.I. on recovery efforts. “We hired some extra people and worked one long shift, seven days a week,” says Jim, a former federal mining inspector."

Ahhh, I see, the family business helped with the excavation.

Context makes some things clearer. Oh... Perhaps you should also find out how the word "essentially" is commonly used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. so what?
the whole scene is a mess of contradictions.

Jim contradicts himself, so it only helps to prove my point.

How do you think they meant "essentially" here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Are you serious?
Really? You think cherry picked quotes will help you prove anything? Are you honestly unaware of the deceptive nature of using cherry picked quotes? How dishonest it is?

Sigh... You know Spooked, for one that claims to know the "truth", you have a very strange way of presenting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. do you suppose we can just let this thread lie?
I certainly agree with your comments. I'm just saying that going forward, of all of spooked's threads, this just might be the one that I least want to see kicked -- not that we can stop him from doing it. The signal-to-macabre ratio approaches or attains an all-time low. (No, I don't think spooked thinks it is possible to 'cherry pick' quotations from what he construes as The Official Story.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I don't see the problem with the quotes
It's not like I took them out of context. Show me how it was "dishonest" to use these quotes.

The point is that there is a contradiction.

As far as "Jim" being away from the site on 9/11, what the hell difference does that make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. still waiting
what was wrong with the quotes, besides the general fact you didn't like the juxtaposition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. There is no "contradiction" and you certainly did yank those quotes completely out of context.
One person, who not even on the scene, making one off-handed comment about the airliner's black box not burning "contradicts" nothing as regards the remains of the people killed that day, in that field.

Though I am loathe to kick this OP, with its morbid content and repulsive implications, this needed to be pointed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. BEST POST YET, Spooked!!!!
"Essentially cremated".
Do you know what that means?
I know you don't, but your postings always give me a good chuckle.
This one, however, is classic and huge laughs!
Keep digging Spooked...you're almost there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Flatulo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Since the human body is about 75% liquid, I imagine most of the remains seeped into the ground.
Plane crashes where there is significant loss of life are routinely designated as hazardous waste sites requiring quarantine and a cleanup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just when I thought you had reached your peak in
posting goofy 9/11 threads, you set a new standard.

A true pro.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about a new sig line, Spooked?
How about "I'm Spooked911...exploring new frontiers in goofiness since 2004"?

Keep digging, Spooked...you're almost there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Glad to see you're at least admitting that 600 lbs of human remains were found...
which is pretty amazing, considering you don't even think a plane crashed.

So, when are you making the trip to Shanksville?

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. C'mon Sid...

600 pounds of human remains?

No problem.

Like most folks, I've easily got that much just sitting in my garage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. In a freezer, I hope....nt
:hi:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Naw...

That's why they are "scorched". I use a blend of hickory and mesquite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. you have 600 lbs of human remains in your garage? odd
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 04:08 PM by Twist_U_Up
this is the mentality of the "trusters"
very low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No, dude...
it's your profound inability to grasp satire. It's actually rather stunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. were you neglected as a child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Have you ever thought of getting elevator shoes so...
everything doesn't keep going over your head?

Keep digging, TuuTuu...you're almost there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Doesn't everyone?

Q: What's the difference between a ferrari and a pile of dead bodies?

A: I don't have a Ferrari in my garage
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. you "Trusters" do have a dark sense of humor
but I suppose if you support the bushco story of 911 you would need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Tell me how the "no-planes" story goes again?
Keep digging, TuuTuu...you're almost there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Get me that pass that allows me into the restricted area, and I will be there asap
Thanks in advance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. What restricted area?...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Don't you know there HAS to be a restricted area.
That's where they hide everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. do you really think regular people are allowed to go all over the "crash" site?
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 08:03 PM by spooked911
visitors to the memorial are kept far away from the actual crash site.

http://pittsburgh.about.com/od/flight_93/p/memorial.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Do you really think that you qualify as...
"regular people"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm not sure-- in most ways yes
are you saying I would be allowed special access?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'm sure you'd be allowed special access somewhere....
dude. Probably for observation. Just not sure where.


Keep digging, Spooked...you're almost there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. thanks for taking this seriously
I appreciate it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. If you took your own claims seriously
Your research would involve more than browsing the interwebs.

Get off your ass, travel to PA, talk to the folks that were involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Spooked needs to re-read my post and...
reflect on the word "observation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. +1...
Less than an 8 hour drive for spooked to get to Shanksville from Indianapolis (location in his profile)

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Let us know what you find, Spooked
I am very interested.
I would go myself, but I am scared of fields...who isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. spooked, I drove from Joplin, MO to Pittsburgh, PA in two days - had to go through Indiana, even.
I'll bet you could make that "research site" in less than ten hours!

How about it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Why don't you call and ask?
Edited on Wed Apr-07-10 09:08 AM by jberryhill
Tell them you are a researcher.

You know, it never hurts to ask.

Same deal with, say, Stonehenge. During regular visiting hours people are kept away from the stones because of too many souvenir collectors and other damage to the site. But you can request access at off hours, especially around important solar days, and so forth.

Get a camera, make a documentary.

Good golly, for someone who wants others to "think outside the box" you certainly do act like you are easily controlled.

ASK.

The worst that can happen is they either say no, or tell you exactly what you need to do to qualify for unrestricted access.

Are you really this incurious when it comes to real life issues, as opposed to your fantasy crusades?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Very strange
You believe the entire crash site was faked, why for some reason you think they would need a restricted area.

If it's all a fake, set up in just a short period, why after 8 plus years would there be a a restricted area?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Because there are still bits and pieces of people out there /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC