Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 9-11 Solution -How the myth was sold-

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:55 PM
Original message
The 9-11 Solution -How the myth was sold-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&hl=en&v=7GDa-L4hHHo

• Jerome Hauer:
• Managing director of Kroll. Inc
• Landed John O’Neil his job as chief of security at the World Trade Centers

MSNBC: 31 minutes after the 2nd plane crash:

“Reported to be able to rally anywhere in the neighborhood of “3000” fighters for his terrorists cause, he is suspected of helping set up an Islamic training center, in fact several of them to prepare soldiers to fight in all parts of the world”

But as been shown "Al Qaeda" is not the same thing as the Taliban...

Al Qaeda does not exist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mr. war on waste


The Lair of Bin Laden is a fictoid that originated in the highly-enterprising British press on November 27th, 2001. The chronology is as follows. On November 26th, the New York Times carried a story based on the account of an a ex-Russian soldier, Viktor Kutsenko, who had served in Afghanistan in the nineteen-eighties in which he claimed that there had seen an elaborate cave complex in Zhawar with "iron doors" that contained " a bakery, a hotel with overstuffed furniture, a hospital with an ultrasound machine, a library, a mosque, weapons of every imaginable stripe; a service bay with a World War II-era Soviet tank inside, in perfect running order." The historic story then added "Mr. bin Laden is reported to have upgraded both it and a nearby camp in the 1990's."



On November 27th, the London-based Independent came up with its own fairly similar troglodyte story, except that it had moved the underground fortress from Zhawar to Tora Bora, where the manhunt for bin Laden was about to begin, and advanced it in time from the nineteen-eighties to the present.
The Independent headlined: "Al-Qa'ida almost 'immune to attack' inside its hi-tech underground lair." In the story, its correspondent Richard Lloyd Parry, in Jalalabad, described a vast redoubt burrowed deep under a mountain, with labyrinthian tunnels sealed by with iron doors. "It has its own ventilation system and its own power, created by a hydro-electric generator. Its walls and floors in the rooms are smooth and finished and it extends 350 yards beneath a solid mountain." It was therefore tunneled almost as deep as the World Trade Center was high. It was also " so well defended and concealed that – short of poison gas or a tactical nuclear weapon – it is immune to outside attack. And it is filled with heavily armed followers of Osama bin Laden, with a suicidal commitment to their cause and with nothing left to lose."


It further claimed that fortress was built " reportedly employing expertise from Mr bin Laden's Saudi construction businesses" and housed "as many as 2,000 Arab and foreign fighters." The story's putative unidentified witness— the lone deep throat— explained, "It's like a hotel, with doors on the left and the right."


The idea that Osama and his followers had entombed themselves in an unassailable fortress under a mountain immediately embedded itself into the imagination of the American press. The Associated Press put The Independent story on its services, which went to hundreds of major newspapers and broadcasting stations. ABC News re-headlined the story "Bin Laden Hide-out Resembles Hotel: Witness," depicting "The cave complex ... filled with bin Laden's fanatical followers." Yahoo noted in its Internet service "Bin Laden has reputedly built a fortress 1,150 feet (350 meters) beneath the mountains, equipped with water, electricity and ventilation and guarded by hundreds or thousands of fighters ready to die for their leader." CBS, expanding the story, reported that an Afghan "commander thinks bin Laden is in a cave fortress known as Tora Bora. The massive hideout was built by the U.S. to house forces fighting the Soviet Army in the 1980s. The complex - nicknamed "bin Laden's ant farm," is burrowed deep into Gree Khil peak -- soaring 13,000 feet above the village of Tora Bora. It is virtually impregnable -- a latticework of tunnels, storage rooms for arms and munitions, and accommodations for up to a thousand fighters. Ventilation shafts bring fresh air 1,200 feet inside the mountain. A nearby river provides hydroelectric power to the complex... at least 2,000 of bin Laden's al-Qaida fighters are believed to be hiding there," In the Los Angeles Times Professor Mark C. Taylor added to his essay on an ancient troglodyte Hittite city in Turkey that "This city and others like it provide the prototype for the underground fortresses where Bin Laden and his followers are presumed to be hiding;" The Atlanta Journal-Constitution put the underground city in context, saying "The bitter and brutal end game between Osama bin Laden and U.S.-led forces is being played out in a mountain fortress the CIA helped build... equipped with ventilation and hydroelectric power." This bunker-fortress, the story continued, "provides bin Laden with significant advantages... it is considered invulnerable even to bunker-busting bombs and impregnable to conventional military attack." The Times of London meanwhile illustrated its story with an artist's rendering of the underground fortress, which dwarfed even Hitler's infamous "eagle's nest" fortress.


The story probably reached its high point on NBC's Meet The Press on December 2nd when Tim Russert, the host of the program, provided Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld with the artist's rendering of bin Laden's fortress. The interview proceeded:



Russert: The Times of London did a graphic, which I want to put on the screen for you and our viewers. This is it. This is a fortress. This is a very much a complex, multi-tiered, bedrooms and offices on the top, as you can see, secret exits on the side and on the bottom, cut deep to avoid thermal detection so when our planes fly to try to determine if any human beings are in there, it's built so deeply down and embedded in the mountain and the rock it's hard to detect. And over here, valleys guarded, as you can see, by some Taliban soldiers. A ventilation system to allow people to breathe and to carry on. An arms and ammunition depot. And you can see here the exits leading into it and the entrances large enough to drive trucks and cars and even tanks. And it's own hydroelectric power to help keep lights on, even computer systems and telephone systems. It's a very sophisticated operation.


Rumsfeld: Oh, you bet. This is serious business. And there's not one of those. There are many of those. And they have been used very effectively. And I might add, Afghanistan is not the only country that has gone underground. Any number of countries have gone underground. The tunneling equipment that exists today is very powerful. It's dual use. It's available across the globe. And people have recognized the advantages of using underground protection for themselves.


A few weeks after the "Meet the Press" interview, US special forces and their Afghan allies occupied Tora Bora. They painstakingly searched Gree Khil mountain and the surrounding area. They found no underground fortress, no hydro-electric power plant, no 2000-room hotel, no ant farm, no iron doors, no ventilating shafts. The troglodyte Lair of Bin Laden turned out to be mythic.

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. do you just think this is a clearing house
for you to post any shit you run across on the net?
seriously, wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Did you even watch the entire length of both videos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. wtf is dudette on vaca ?
birds of a feather......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. What the fuck are you babbling about now....
dude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh look, the "Power of Nightmares" video again
You do realise that even the FBI was saying the same thing back in 2002?

...al Qaeda is far less a large organization than a facilitator, sometimes orchestrator, of Islamic militants around the globe. These militants are linked by ideas and goals, not by organizational structure. The intent is establishment of a state, or states ruled by Islamic law and free of western influence. Bin Laden's contribution to the Islamic jihad is a creature of the modern world. He has spawned a global network of individuals with common, radical ideas, kept alive through modern communications and sustained through forged documents and money laundering activities on a global scale.
http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/bowman073102.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It was already sold
MSNBC: 31 minutes after the 2nd plane crash:

“Reported to be able to rally anywhere in the neighborhood of “3000” fighters for his terrorists cause, he is suspected of helping set up an Islamic training center, in fact several of them to prepare soldiers to fight in all parts of the world”


"You do realise that even the FBI was saying the same thing back in 2002?"

Would have helped 31 minutes after the 2nd plane....

READ THE POST

HOW THE 911 MYTH WAS SOLD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HudsonValley Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. 9-11 solution
Thx for your post. I jumped to another video that you may find interesting as well: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/219.html Not sure if the additional "blasts" shown in the many video clips were ever explained. So many questions remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. For the life of me, I don't understand why people believe that...
things blowing up in buildings on fire (generators, transformers, uninterruptible power supplies, batteries, etc.) need an explanation. Use some critical thinking, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. perhaps your not as bright as most folks that are in the know?
or maybe you are but your agenda differs a tad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Or, maybe you're just fucking wrong, dude....
things explode during fires. Rational people don't think that's some huge mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Dude
WTC victim, Jim Gartenberg, core blown out, WABC,09:32, 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eSVsid7eKE&playnext_from=TL&videos=l9jE9htdoOs
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Keep digging, dude...
you're almost there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well which one was it?
generators, transformers, uninterruptible power supplies, batteries?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Jetfuel hurling down an elevatorshaft
Mark Roberts compiled a handy list of eyewitnesses, who experienced the same "inside-out" explosion as mr. Gartenberg:
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=1907291&postcount=40

That list was made 3½ years ago, in 2006, a year which a lot of truthers seems to be stuck in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's
amazng there was a fireball after the plane crashes. Clearly an enormous amount of the fuel would be required to run down to the basement, but explode and exert enough force to collapse the core up near the plane crash, blast debris outwards and do the same underground?

2006 a funny year it was. Particularly 9/10/06
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh3_wWmS6lk
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No one cares about your incredulity....
dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. yeah, that's a good video
something else for the untruthers to ignore
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Dude...
the buildings were full of all those things. When buildings are on fire, they routinely explode. It's not a fucking riddle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Keep digging dude, you're almost there
And thanks for the laugh..."When buildings are on fire, they routinely explode."

That was f'n hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Maybe you should ask a firefighter...
dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I have
Maybe you should ask a firefighter...
dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Ask the firefighter about backdraft, dude, then ask them...
why fires in skyscrapers are so dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mcollins Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. is deconstruct and spooked911 the same guy?
This xposting is very confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. They do appear to be twins, but...
only because they're both equally reason and logic-resistant, although it's arguable Spooked is in a class all his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mcollins Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. It's like reading the same person.
They both have the same syntax of speech and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm sure they both conduct their "research" on...
the same CT websites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Generally my posts
are related to the financial aspect of 9 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. You're a no-planer? Yes? nt
Edited on Sat Jul-10-10 03:08 PM by LARED
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. at the pentagon & field yes
and I have good reason to believe so.

example- trillions at pentagon= something else not Hani Hanjour or w.e. his name is.
example- united 93- united put options linked to Alex Brown. Now is the ex director of the cia really relying on a few passengers to take that plane down before it hits the Whitehouse?
Ziad Jarrah’s ID? The bandanas mentioned in the phone calls. This is phony shit man.

So as you see I focus on economic aspects when I make my conclusion. I want to make it clear however I never said no planes at New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Wow, I never realized there were subgroups of no-planers- nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. now you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Dude...
Why use planes for only part of the plot? What about the 100+ witnesses who saw AA 77 hit the Pentagon? As far as the "missing trillions", you need to go back and read the accounts of the meeting at which Rumsfeld made the announcement. Hint: the money isn't "missing". Do you honestly think if it were missing and you wanted to conceal it, you'd announce it the day before 9/11?

Again, this is why you aren't taken seriously here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. If you could only learn to follow the money
all this no plane stuff would all make sense. Take it from a true financial genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'd be willing to bet that...
deconstruct911 doesn't even know his way around a balance sheet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. No thanks
But I bet we could make a good case that double entry accounting is the reason for all the lost trillions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Missing is a name
for the "accounting games". Read the thread on the audit on DU. Again an example that people do take it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Simple question, dude...
Are you claiming the money is missing or was stolen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ablewon Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. At a David Copperfield show, maybe.

"What about the 100+ witnesses who saw AA 77 hit the Pentagon?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Do you honestly believe you can just handwave off 100+ direct eyewitnesses...
Edited on Sat Jul-10-10 11:15 PM by SDuderstadt
dude?

Have you even read their testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ablewon Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. dude - it's okay if you want to believe in miracles...

specifically, all of the miracles that had to have occurred on 9/11 if the OCT is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. In other words...
you can't argue on facts...just handwave them away as a "miracle".

Typical "truther".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ablewon Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. dude, the facts show that the OCT requires miracles...

and trying to argue in favor of OCT miracles is not a sign of an informed person.

I prefer facts, but I'll defend your right to believe in OCT miracles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. More handwaving...
You can't dismiss physical evidence that disproves your claim by labeling it "miracles", dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. please give some examples of "miracles"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC